Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
This topic is about
Time-Marked Warlock
Book & Author Page Issues
>
Remove extra edition
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Dan
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jul 28, 2024 08:39AM
The current information for Time-Marked warlock by Shami Stovall shows three editions. The paperback and Kindle editions with the same cover is correct. The edition with a different cover and releasing on August 1st instead of August 20th does not exist.
reply
|
flag
Dan wrote: "The current information for Time-Marked warlock by Shami Stovall shows three editions. The paperback and Kindle editions with the same cover is correct. The edition with a different cover and relea..."It is marked as an ARC, which we do catalogue.
Avery wrote: "hello !please can you remove this one please!https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2..."
Done. Please don't create an alternate cover edition when a cover change is needed. Also, start your own thread in future; don't use one about another book.
I scoured the entry and didn't see any mention of an ARC copy. The incorrect entry simply says "paperback" and a future (inaccurate) publication date. If that cover is supposed to represent the ARC version, my own review of that book was posted April 5th.
I scoured the entry and didn't see any mention of an ARC copy. The incorrect entry simply says "paperback" and a future (inaccurate) publication date. If that cover is supposed to represent the ARC version, my own review of that book was posted April 5th.
The reason I know it is an ARC is that it says it is an ARC on the book record.
So not information the public would have access to? Could the viewable entry of "paperback" be changed to "ARC copy"? Also, why does the ARC copy show that arbitrary future release date?
Anyone can see it says "ARC edition" here:https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...
ARC is not a format, although they are usually paperbacks.
The publication date was set by the author, so maybe you could ask her.
I have no clue why, but the mobile version of that webpage omits what "anyone can see." I had to pull up the desktop version of the link to see that it was the ARC.
Yes, you need to use a computer to get the full features of the site.
