Reading the Detectives discussion

This topic is about
The Case of the Canterfell Codicil
Group Challenges
>
June 24: The Case of the Canterfell Codicil: PJ Fitzsimmons (Challenge Title)
date
newest »

As it is June tomorrow (so quickly!) I thought I would open the thread.
After so many disappointing reads, I was so relieved that I enjoyed this one...
After so many disappointing reads, I was so relieved that I enjoyed this one...
Yes, the year is racing by! Thanks for the introduction and opening this up, Susan.
I'm currently reading this - not too sure what I think as yet, as I have quite a long way still to go, but there's a lot of humour.
The spoiler thread is linked below:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I'm currently reading this - not too sure what I think as yet, as I have quite a long way still to go, but there's a lot of humour.
The spoiler thread is linked below:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

I’m nitpicking here, but right away the bizarre name of the lead character bugged me - Anty? Tony is the usual nickname for Anthony as far as I know-Anty makes me think of “Auntie” or “Ants in the pants”, a teasing childhood descriptor for someone who can’t sit still! I always feel if an author gives a character an odd name, physical feature, or other descriptor, there should be a good reason-if it’s meant to be whimsical or funny and it falls flat, it’s a turnoff - I feel like their humor, if there is any, probably won’t be very entertaining.
Susan in NC wrote: "Seemed very Wodehouse, but I always feel it’s so easy to miss the mark when copying a master!..."
That's true, as seen with all the sequels to classics by other authors, although I am sometimes tempted to try those and have found a few I've liked over the years.
I have come across people called Anthony who are known as "Ant" and indeed there is a famous Ant on British TV, but I haven't met an "Anty" as yet!
That's true, as seen with all the sequels to classics by other authors, although I am sometimes tempted to try those and have found a few I've liked over the years.
I have come across people called Anthony who are known as "Ant" and indeed there is a famous Ant on British TV, but I haven't met an "Anty" as yet!
This was a reread for me and I love the series: a mix of a smart Wooster and a wise-cracking Poirot, but humor is very personal.

Perhaps the Jeeves and Wooster vibe was a mistake. Although our hero doesn't have a valet. In fact, this book seems rather thin on servants altogether and those that do exist are less than capable.
I'm about halfway through now and must admit this one isn't doing a lot for me. I don't actively dislike it, but am just finding it a bit boring. I feel Clara Benson gets the Wooster vibe a bit better and find Freddy much funnier than Anty, although I know not everyone likes those books. As you say, Sandy, humour is very personal.
Good point about there not being many servants in this book, Susan - then again, maybe they have all been laid off as part of the household's economies!
Good point about there not being many servants in this book, Susan - then again, maybe they have all been laid off as part of the household's economies!


I found that strange, about the family’s supposed wealth, but lack of servants - I will be interested to read on and see if the wealth has been depleted! I’m only about 30% into it, but from what we’ve learned so far, Fiddles at least believes his uncle’s parsimonious management drove the quality staff away…seems fishy (dead uncle aside!)


I enjoyed this story well enough and the range of characters were interesting. The pace was good, staying the right side of frantic without getting stodgy. There were however too many errors in language and terminology for my tastes.
It was a pleasant enough read but I doubt if I will go on with the series.
Craftyhj wrote: "My review of this one was "Quite fun but a few too many anachronisms for me". .."
HJ, I agree - I also thought there were too many anachronisms, errors in language, etc. I also got irritated with the writer constantly spelling "Mister" like that - why not write "Mr" like every other author? It's so distracting. (Well, it distracted me, anyway.) I suppose at least we didn't get "Missus" as well! Maybe I'll try the audiobook for the second in this series and see if I get on better that way.
I also think, as Susan in NC mentioned earlier, the author made a bit of a mistake in comparing himself with Wodehouse, since his writing style can't compare with the master. He seems to be trying too hard for my taste, with a lot of bizarre descriptions and heavy-handed humour that slow the story down too much. For instance, I noticed there was a two-page description of who ate what for breakfast at one point!
HJ, I agree - I also thought there were too many anachronisms, errors in language, etc. I also got irritated with the writer constantly spelling "Mister" like that - why not write "Mr" like every other author? It's so distracting. (Well, it distracted me, anyway.) I suppose at least we didn't get "Missus" as well! Maybe I'll try the audiobook for the second in this series and see if I get on better that way.
I also think, as Susan in NC mentioned earlier, the author made a bit of a mistake in comparing himself with Wodehouse, since his writing style can't compare with the master. He seems to be trying too hard for my taste, with a lot of bizarre descriptions and heavy-handed humour that slow the story down too much. For instance, I noticed there was a two-page description of who ate what for breakfast at one point!
The first book in the Anty Boisjoly Mystery series was written by P.J. Fitzsimmons and first published in 2020.
1920s gadabout Anty Boisjoly takes on his first case when his Oxford chum is facing the gallows, accused of the murder of his wealthy uncle.
Not one but two locked-room murders later, Boisjoly's pitting his wits and witticisms against a subversive butler, a senile footman, a single-minded detective-inspector, an errant goat, and the eccentric conventions of the pastoral Sussex countryside to untangle a multi-layered mystery of secret bequests, ancient writs, love triangles, revenge, and a teasing twist in the final paragraph.
The Case of the Canterfell Codicil is a classic, cosy, locked-room mystery with an improbable plot inspired by Agatha Christie and prose in the style of an homage to PG Wodehouse.
Please do not post spoilers in this thread. Thank you.