Do you like when books have pictures?

[Claudio]

I personally like books with pictures much more than pure text books, specially if it's a science or history book.

[Christine]

An (auto)biography without photos wouldn't be the same.

[Rori]

it depends on the book I usually read books with no pics on them but I've read hidden pictures and it was great I liked that I got to see the drawings instead of reading the description of it.

[Michael]

In biographies, yes, pictures are good. In some fantasy novels, maps can be a help. Otherwise, I'm not really interested in picture books unless I'm reading Dr. Seuss.

[Melody (belongs to skz)]

I like books that have like a design on the chapter pages and maps

[Dominique]

It depends on the book. I recently read a book that had drawings in which I liked.

[Tara]

I loved them in Hidden Pictures by Jason Rekulak. Truthfully, I don't see pictures a lot in the books I read, so sometimes it's a nice surprise here and there.

[Malissa]

Depends on the type of book & genre.

[Dee]

Michael wrote: "In biographies, yes, pictures are good. In some fantasy novels, maps can be a help. Otherwise, I'm not really interested in picture books unless I'm reading Dr. Seuss."

Me, too, Michael! You've written what I would have--but better.

[Kai's]

I used to love books with pictures but now I love pure text books