The Next Best Book Club discussion
Revive a Dead Thread
>
I should have read...
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Jeane
(new)
Oct 28, 2008 03:50AM

reply
|
flag

I'm thinking about picking it up along with Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close next time I borrow books from work.


welcome to the club. I too haven't read any Harry Potter book so far. And I doubt that I will ever read them.
There are a lot of book I should have read but haven't read yet. They are just too many to list them here. Maybe one day I find the time to read them. But with the economic crisis I might no longer have enough money to buy new books and then I will finally read all those books I bought but never read.


I know I should, I just seem to always find something more intriguing to read.


Jane Austen/The Brontes: On my TBR. I have a hard time reading books that take place pre-1950 because it all looks like the wild west in my head. Or in a different country because their landmarks mean nothing to me.

For a different reason I should have read Amber Spyglass, since I read the first two.. but during a dinner out several people starting discussing the book and after knowing all that happened I lost motivation :( I shall return to it someday.



surprisingly, i've read a large amount of the ones people have cited so far. i really liked Gatsby, Wuthering Heights, Jane Eyre, To Kill a Mockingbird, and the HP books.
i was so-so on 1984 (liked it, but was a bit much) and The Chocolate Wars. HEmingway (that I've read) was alright, but not something i understood all of the fuss about.
i could not stand Things Fall Apart. just not my cup of tea.
all of that said, i think the one book that i've never read that i "should" read is A Tale of Two Cities. tried it twice, will never try again. i literally handed it bqack to my senior English teacher in high school, i was that serious about not reading it.
the talk of books you "should" read reminds of something a professor i had once said. he told us that there are "highbrow" and "lowbrow" books, and that the only ones truly worth reading where the "highbrow" ones. he lumped anything written before 1960 as a "highbrow" book, and totally wrote off all other things. he asked our class to name a great author, and one of the responses was Stephen King. i'm not a fan, but i understand where that comes from. i swear, that professor almost ran the poor kid out of class, telling him that people like King and Tom Clancy and others of that ilk are not true authors, they produce only trash that "mindless" people read to make themselves feel better, because they are reading. i could not believe that he was saying it then, and i still don't believe it 11 years later.





To Kill a Mockingbird
Catcher in the Rye
Charles Dickens (take your pick-I've only read A Christmas Carol)
Ernest Hemingway (see above, Dickens)
I just read my first Jules Verne, so I won't put his other great works in here.

To Kill a Mockingbird
Catch-22
A Clockwork Orange
Catcher in the Rye
Anything by Jane Austen
A Tale of Two Cities
Of Mice and Men
Really, I'm just naming a lot of books that are "classics" that I missed out on in high school.

Still haven't read many of the other classics. They are sitting on my bookcase waiting for me.

i forgot to add in my original reply that in college, i bought a book called 100 Banned Books. great reading in and of itself, it has case stories on the top 100 banned books of all time, broken down into categories based on why they were challenged. anyhoo, it's a great resource for finding some suggestions for those "should" reads!
Utopia. Especailly since I bought it three years ago.

Pride & Prejudice
Dickens in general, particularly Great Expecations
The Grapes of Wrath
1984
The Color Purple

Books mentioned in this topic
Flowers for Algernon (other topics)The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)