2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

Rules of Prey (Lucas Davenport, #1)
This topic is about Rules of Prey
7 views
Rules of Prey > Question H

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Jonetta (ejaygirl) | 9278 comments Mod
The gun maddog dropped during his assault on Carla was traced back to a closed case and should have been in Evidence, meaning someone in law enforcement removed it. Lucas was able to come up with about thirty potential suspects and offered them a sort of odd immunity if the person who took it came forward. Was it wrong to do so given the severity of the action or the right thing to do given its importance to the maddog investigation? When you learned the reason why it was taken, did that alter your opinion or strengthen it?


Sharon Kallenberger Marzola | 3474 comments He had to stop a vicious murderer, and they didn't have any clues. It was necessary to come up with something to point them in the right direction. When I learned the reasons, it made it even easier to accept. I did question why he didn't buy a gun for their protection, but either way, I was okay with it.


Logan (loganturner) | 7 comments I think he knew he would never get them to come forward without knowing they were fully protected. We offer it to criminals all the time to turn on their co-defendants so it seemed appropriate in this instance.


back to top