Book Nook Cafe discussion
2024- Book Prompt Challenge
>
Michele's 2024 Book Challenge
message 51:
by
Michele
(new)
Jan 27, 2024 06:32AM

reply
|
flag

Definitely NOT a book for me - impressed you made your way through it!


Isn't that the way? I love that comment, Michele.

I will not bore you with lots of details here, but I gave it 5/5 in my review on GR. I used it for a number of prompts: historical fiction, political science or govt, debut novel, took place in a city that I don't live in.
I think it's an important reminder of the mentality of our adversaries at home and abroad. We know what they're doing, now we have to teach our minds how to deal with it so it doesn't matter so much what they're doing to the minds of susceptible people. And do you know why every book I've read this month contains-- prominently --references to wolves? Did I miss something?

What a curious fact about the author, Giuliano da Empoli, and the fact the book was written in French, apparently. Publishing in Europe must be quite different...or maybe i just don't know enough about it to understand.
Your concluding comment about wolves is interesting. I hadn't realized this was happening in your books. Did you only now realize it? I've had something similar occur as i read books, but usually it was just a coincidence. Odd, that.

My list of books i read recently with references to wolves: North Woods, The Wizard of the Kremlin, All the Sinners Bleed, Chain-Gang All-Stars and Ali & Nino. The cosmos is trying hard tell me something, but I don’t know what.

And do you know why every book I've read this month contains-- prominently --references to wolves? Did I miss something?
lol

I agree. That is one of the reasons I'm reading Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present . I want to know the signs to look for. Things can change on a dime as history has shown.

I'm torn on this front, Michele. I believe more of us need to become interested in our nation and politics seems to be the best way to do so. But oh! those choices! The principles are one thing, the practice something else.
Maybe it's the sort of people i'm drawn to (who are drawn to me, maybe?) but i seem to know quite a number of people who are interested in politics and actively, at that. But there is a level of frustration there, as well. I'm not sure there is a book about that because we need an "Action Handbook".
Nope, because each party probably already has one and still we seem more mired in the now-out-of-the-closet hatred that was festering for decades, apparently. Can you tell i'm avoiding news programs and books about this? As a lifelong pessimist, i didn't think i could go much darker. It seems i can.

BTW: Started new books. Both have wolf mentions. One set in Ireland suburb of Dublin where there are no wolves for real, one is about an Indian boy from Manitoba , where thinking about wolves makes some sense.

Very curious about Wolves, i must say. As it happens one of the fake characters, created for an online identity was named Wolfe. Possibly you need to read Day--Michael Cunningham, too.

That said, I didn't like this book at the start, and compared this novel unfavorably to first-person accounts I had read covering similar territory. By the end, I saw its value and was very moved by authenticity that I hadn't felt initially as Wagamese described his early years. I gave it 4/5 stars. It filled the prompt about POC as authors and characters. This one had both of those.


Indian Horse--Richard Wagamese Thank you for these posts about Wagamese's book, Michele. I, for one, am not bothered whether you post about books you've read in pairings or alone, just as long as you post about books!
I appreciate your comments about this and have added it to my TBR. As i read additional reviews from others here at Goodreads who read the book, i was struck by one. In it, the reviewer reminded us that in the US we basically repeated these events with the removal of children from their parents when we took migrant children from their migrant parents at the border. This hadn't exactly dawned on me but a valid case can be made for that.
The things we do to children.

That's why we are here at BNC. We want to hear all about books and authors. However you want to share is fine with us! Keep on !

It's the story of a family, beginning with the parents of a young couple who get married under unusual circumstances. Almost nobody in their circle thinks this marriage is a good idea, but the young people are convinced it is their answer. The bee stings and the wedding is ruined. But also, a prophecy made by the local lady seer does not come true, or at least not in the way the bride expected. From there it becomes a family saga--Romeo marries Juliet, etc. They have 2 children of their own who are screwed up, and each of the four family members, Mom, Dad, daughter and son, have a connection to an abandoned shed that stands in a woods behind their home. There was a lot of yadda-yadda, all of which took a very long time to develop, and a few welcome surprises, ending in an effort to get all the important characters together at the shed in the woods for a super-special bang up ending that never happens. Murray leaves characters and readers standing in the woods and apparently expects the fun to happen after the book is closed and you're trying to figure out which ending would have been best. It was too long, too conventional, then unconventional in bad ways. For me, a 2/5.

It's the story of a family, beginning with the parents of a young couple who get married under unusual circumstances. Almost nobody in their circle ..."
I liked it more than you did, Michele. I hope your next read is a good one for you.

It's the story of a family, beginning with the parents of a young couple who get married under unusual circumstances. Almost nobody in their circle ..."
I appreciate your review, Michele. Congratulations on adding to your prompt list!


The author deftly uses the letters, notes, libraries and memories of hundreds of people who knew FDR and who worked with him in politics or in government to narrate the events of his last days. He went to great lengths to prove what had been proven many times before.---that FDR could handle people, and frequently did.
Roosevelt did not like confrontations, nor did he like to make decisions prematurely. He wanted to see how things developed before committing to a course of action. He kept many possibilities in his mind at the same time, and tried to put off a final decision, especially if he was losing the argument. He always had a Plan B and C and maybe D and E. When he reached what appeared to be an impasse, he would suggest another route, a different wording, a trade of this for that. His goal, of course, was to keep the discussion going until a compromise could be found.
His techniques for people-management included being unfailingly polite and entertaining with guests, welcome and unwelcome. He reacted positively to their suggestions and demands, leaving the impression that he was in agreement with them, which he often was, at least partially. But he never made promises until the problem had ripened and a decision was needed immediately. FDR was not a linear thinker, and the ones who called him a man without principles were most often people who thought in black and white terms, or had career goals in mind. Roosevelt was a thinker, a visionary, who was surrounded by men with far less vision and more absolute certainty than was warranted. His biggest job, it seemed, was to hold them off until they saw the light. (e.g. Churchill with D Day and with Stalin)
On one issue, I thought Lelyveld was off base. He suggested that FDR didn't understand atomic energy or the implications of using the bomb. In fact, Roosevelt was aware that the bomb could not be kept secret forever, and that Stalin was already learning things that would lead him to the Manhattan Project before much longer. Nobel scientist Neils Bohr asked for a meeting to mansplain all this. FDR sent him to Churchill, who sent him right back. That took about 6 months. Finally, the scientist and the president met. Bohr explained. Roosevelt was entertaining and friendly, but did not follow his advice to inform the Russians about the atomic research. In fact, the thought of Bohr running around with the most secret information in the world was frightening. He asked his minions to keep track of what Bohr was up to. Churchill wanted to fit him for a casket, but refrained. Lelyveld concluded that FDR did not understand what Bohr was telling him. But using his own research, I believe Roosevelt not only understood, but that he had already played out all the implications in his own mind. He was way ahead of Bohr, already planning postwar management of disputes and weapons.
I don't see Roosevelt as very different from Lincoln in respect to his ability to charm and divert advisors until he was ready to make a decision. But I do think Lelyveld did his homework and presented a winning case for FDR's extraordinary skills.
4/5 stars

His Final Battle: The Last Months of Franklin Roosevelt
That's odd.
Are you putting in a start and finished date?


Michele, i appreciate that you took the time to write a review of this book. Your comments are fascinating, whether you agree or not with the author.
One question i wanted to pose, which i don't want you to feel obliged to answer, is whether or not the following could have also been interpreted as being wishy-washy, the prototype for most of our politicians today.
Roosevelt did not like confrontations, nor did he like to make decisions prematurely. He wanted to see how things developed before committing to a course of action."
While i believe doing so was useful, particularly for our entry into WWII, it also sounds like an excuse for someone trying to appease those against joining the action in Europe. Was this addressed?
Regardless, your summation is impressive. I'm befuddled by Lelyveld's conclusion FDR didn't understand what Bohr told him about the bomb. The very fact that he didn't want the USSR to know about it seems to declare differently.
Again, thank you for sharing about this book.

I think the author’s best work was his description of FDR’s dealings with Stalin, and how he slowly and reluctantly relinquished his hope that compromise could be found. Nobody could have made Stalin more amenable without dropping a bomb on him.

And demand for speed has grown since then, thanks to communication satellites and other technological advances. No time to think until they have to backtrack. You make a good point, Michele.
Interesting about the writing of the FDR/Stalin actions.

The Midnight Library by Matt Haig - popular book last year. About a woman who doesn't want to live. When she tries to kill herself with pills, she wakes up in no-man's land and is given a chance to change her fate at the Midnight Library where books containing every possible version of her life exist and may be checked out. Rules apply. 3/5 stars . I put it under sci-fi and fantasy.
Going Infinity by Michael Lewis - Biography of Samuel Bankman-Fried, newly convicted felon who lost billions of dollars while playing at being a real businessman dealing in cryptocurrency. Another billionaire on the spectrum who is more like a robot than most men and has a superpower talent that leads everyone to believe he can do everything. Like Elon Musk in many ways. Did you know there is a philosophy called effective altruism (EA) subscribed to by people who think they are more moral than anybody else, which says you need to maximize your earning potential in order to do good for humanity and then nearly kill yourself taking advantage of opportunities to bamboozle the investors? I put this one under biography and business 4/5 stars

You liked Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon more than I did. I felt Lewis came into the project too much of a fanboy. I gave it 2/5

Great work, Michele, on two prompts.
In answer to the above question, no i didn't. What a mission they set for themselves. Thanks for that bit of info!


The Nightingale I gave it a 3/5
Nice job on the prompt, Michele !

Meanwhile, cograts on effortlessly fulfilling another prompt, Michele. And thank you for the incidental memory search. 😀

Yizhar explains the effect of war on the Arabs who are being chased from their homes, but also on the young Israeli soldiers who are ordered to do the chasing. It makes the case for peace in a way that's personal and not political. If you can wade through the unfamiliar verbiage, you will be moved. And the afterword is worth reading as an explainer of all the things you would never have known otherwise. I thought it was a worthwhile effort. I learned things. 5/5 Category: History
Maybe I should make another category: History I have lived through, or something like that. For now, it's plain history.

That sounds like a very timely and poignant read, Michele.

In the last sentence you mentioned, "History I have lived through...". Do you mean history that took place in your lifetime or that you lived there at some point?
Just curious. and you do not need to reply. :-)


In the last sentence you mentioned, "History I have lived through...". Do you mean history that took pl..."
I wish I could remember why I implied I lived through the first Arab-Israeli war--or any war, for that matter. I was only months old and living in New Jersey at that time. I guess Oct 7 activated my always-strong identification with Israel. I went out and bought a Star of David necklace (as did my 14-year-old Chinese grandson who was adopted to the USA at the age of 2 and who has been raised in a different religion), I have my reservations about what unrelenting hatred and existential threats have done to Jewish religion and society, though. Netanyahu. Enough said.

Thanks for the reply, Michele. I think there are some scars on our psyche which transcend our actual presence. This one was an important one for many of us. It's touching to read how your own family reacted.

I'm always intrigued more by the notion which occurs to an author in reimagining a well known novel, than i am by the results. Thank you for sharing about this one. Not having read the classic, i would be unprepared to make observations about the new version.
It's that awkwardness in trying to create powerful-enough circumstances which strikes one as unfortunate. The very era in which one lives would place the circumstances in a strong light. What changes people in the 19th century, might barely be significant enough in the 21st.
Michele, thank you for sharing about this one.


I'm squeamish when it comes to violence in book, TV and film, so I probably would appreciate less specific details.

It must be challenging for some authors (& editors, if they have one) to decide what crosses the line when describing murders. I've read reviews over the years which have mentioned both too much & too few descriptions as marring a book. I don't need to hear about viscera oozing but do like a sense of how brutal a killing was. Again, it must be a tough call.

Congratulations on that prompt, Michele!


Interesting. I see the one star reviews take the author to task. It would probably make a lively debate read for a book club selection.
The Brothers: The Road to an American Tragedy by Masha Gessen by Masha Gessen
I've toyed in the past with reading another book by this author.
The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin
Have you read that one ?


I read his On Tyranny Graphic Edition: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century by Timothy Snyder
Books mentioned in this topic
Remarkably Bright Creatures (other topics)Remarkably Bright Creatures (other topics)
The Twyford Code (other topics)
The Twyford Code (other topics)
Creation Lake (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Olga Tokarczuk (other topics)Chris Whitaker (other topics)
Mark T. Sullivan (other topics)
Anne Morrow Lindbergh (other topics)
Charles Augustus Lindbergh (other topics)
More...