Reading the Chunksters discussion
This topic is about
To Serve Them All My Days
To Serve Them All My Days
>
To Serve Them All My Days - Week 10
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Hugh
(new)
Dec 04, 2023 01:38AM
This is the final part of the discussion, and covers part IX (and any comments about the book as a whole).
reply
|
flag
TO SERVE THEM ALL MY DAYS – 10th Week - PART IV, Chapters 1-3I will put the summary in spoilers. (view spoiler)
I liked the ending of the story with David bringing in Earnshaw so that he can experience what David experienced. It is an reminder of the cyclical nature of life, something that David's recollections of Britain bouncing back from previous internal bloody conflicts also relects. David comes to finally feel that somehow, even with much loss, everything comes out alright in the end.
I thought it interesting that Julia and David agree it is best not to tell their son Charles "Clark" of his true parentage. My guess is that if this happened at 21th Century Bamfylde they would NOT choose to keep it a secret. Contemporary mores favor such disclosure, at least when the child is old enough. Another contemporary factor favoring disclosure is the easier access to information via technology. Non-disclosure tends to cause more problems due to the child's own discovery than early disclosure would have.
I too liked the way Delderfield brought the story to a complete full circle by introducing Earnshaw and ending the story on an optimistic note. I dreaded the outcomes of WW II in the story.
We made it! Thank you so much for bringing To Serve Them All My Days into my life and to both of you for such insights!
Cat wrote: "Brian E wrote: "[...] as I think she might have led him astray if he had let her." I'm puzzling over this - Please would you help me to understand this angle?"I'm addressing this question from Week 8 in this Week 10 discussion so I don't have to use spoilers for some of it. I hope this helps you understand what I was trying to say.
My personal opinion and feeling was that second wife Chris was more self-focused in her advice to David than the first wife Beth was. I thought Beth helped guide David in making better decisions, one that would best effectuate HIS values and goals. Chris had so many of her own strong personal opinions on things, I think her advice would have tried to guide David into decisions that reflected HER values and goals rather than helped David effectuate his own. I say this knowing that Chris did know and bow to David's Bamfylde-first attitude. But that's on the "big picture level" On the "small picture" individual situation level, Chris had opinions on the correct result and pronounced them even knowing it might conflict with David's.
Two examples:
1. When former student Christopherson came to announce he was going to help the Republicans in Spain, Chris jumped in with 'good for you' encouraging him rather than letting David handle the counseling. He was David's student not hers.
2. Rather than merely coaching Sax and Beth into how to approach David to get his blessing on their early marriage, Chris actively encouraged them in the early marriage.
Thus, the short answer is that I thought Chris might lead David into decisions reflecting Chris's values and goals. By using the term "Astray" I meant in a direction than did not meet David's own goals and values.
David knew that about Chris and accepted them and that's why things between them worked. It was David's long-time sage Howarth that gave him the wise advise to give Chris her own arena, the Cradle, where she could be kept busy effectuating her own values and goals in her arena and be too busy to get involved in David's business.
Thanks for all the hard work you have done on the summaries Brian, and thanks to you, Nidhi and Cat for keeping the discussions going. Sorry I never got hold of the book.
Hugh wrote: "Thanks for all the hard work you have done on the summaries Brian"I'm glad to assist the Moderator as long as I don't have to be the Moderator. I had recently led a discussion of a Trollope novel in the Reading the 20th Century group and found that doing the review necessary for writing summaries helped me better understand what I had read. Due to this, I was willing to do them here.
However, doing the summaries does mean you devote about double the usual time toward a book. I felt that, even if you did get hold of a copy of the book, it would have been really tough for you to devote single time let alone double time to reading the book. As I had nominated it and wanted to read it, I was both willing to and somewhat obligated to summarize here. I felt that writing the summaries was valuable as an aid to me regardless of whether anyone else read them. So not a waste of time at all.
Hugh, you could further thank me by telling what you thought of the Booker winner and a few of your favorites from the shortlist.
EDIT: Hugh, I've read your review of Prophet Song and will likely read it sometime next year.
Books mentioned in this topic
To Serve Them All My Days (other topics)Prophet Song (other topics)

