MCU: Next Gen discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archives [2020-Now]
>
moderator chat [2023-2023]
message 1:
by
Z ||Frypans, Am I Right?!||, Barnes
(new)
Nov 18, 2023 02:12PM
Mod
reply
|
flag
small thing! I saw your new group description, and just fyi Tony is still alive, in this group all canonically-dead heroes are alive. like Thanos happened I think but somehow everyone is alive
I think it's a bit...like, I like how it has more marvel characters, but I think you can't see them super well if it was in a small space
falling ♠ delilah wrote: "it's a little big and rectangular, in my opinion
i think the one i have right now looks good
it's captain marvel"
I Agree
i think the one i have right now looks good
it's captain marvel"
I Agree
Z, I have a recommendation: for the Character List, I'm wondering if you should bold all the OG character's names so that whoever is looking at the list can clearly see how many kids are left for a particular character underneath it? Right now everything kind of blends together and I think having a distinction/more polished look to the list would be helpful
Z! Something I wanted to address:-so. we’re thinking it’s about 2023, right? Peter, MJ, and Kate Bishop are all still technically kids here so how can they have kids of their own? I think we need to prohibit Peter having any kids tbh. Either that or make the timeline like, 2045 as someone suggested to me? Which may kinda wreck what some of us have so I think it may be easier to ban kids of already kid avengers? People can make siblings of Peter and such but I think kids are a bit much
-and Morgan Stark being 21 makes no sense either unless again, the year is then 2045. Which again, we could do, but then we’d have to edit our characters, which, fine, but also, we could just keep Morgan at 5 if this is 2023
I think we’d have to still change some stuff though. Many of our characters seem to have been around for some of the events of the earlier avengers films which would change if this takes place in 2035
falling ♠ delilah wrote: "If we changed it to 2045, then we'd still have to change the ages."Exactly
My point is, if we don’t want to change much we stick with 2023 and just scratch the kids of kid avengers idk
No no we can!I’m just saying we all have to be prepared for that, that we have to be prepped to change every character we already have since a lot of us I think have ones who were born like, 2005 or so
falling ♠ delilah wrote: "elizabeth wrote: "My point is, if we don’t want to change much we stick with 2023 and just scratch the kids of kid avengers idk"That would involve a person deleting their character and I don't th..."
True.
Cause that’s my other worry, old OG Avengers. And yeah that would be a lot of adjustments—like a lot a lot—but I am willing to do that since you’re right, it’s better than deleting someone’s character
okay y'all, please, its just a date, first of all. we can figure this out. the thing was--it was suggested to be later because of the kids of Peter, and the person who has one suggested a multiverse where their character comes from an older version of Peter and MJ. Thus they keep their character and the rest of us don't have to change our characters, thats all
falling ♠ delilah wrote: "ᶜʰˡᵒᵉ ᴮᵒᵘʳᵍᵉᵒⁱˢ ❝ᵁᵗᵗᵉʳˡʸ ᴿⁱᵈⁱᶜᵘˡᵒᵘˢ❝ wrote: "Mateo isn't from their universe, so the year doesn't affect him as he comes from an older version"Ah, I wasn't aware of that. We could still do 2035,..."
yes but the rest of us had based off 2023 and were willing to change it for chloe, but since chloe came up with a solution, we think we're sticking to 2023
falling ♠ delilah wrote: "elizabeth wrote: "okay y'all, please, its just a date, first of all. we can figure this out. the thing was--it was suggested to be later because of the kids of Peter, and the person who has one sug..."thats how Z and I feel about 2023 i'm sorry; we had kinda had it placed there until the peter situation came up
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.



