Reading the Detectives discussion

This topic is about
The Heretic's Apprentice
Buddy reads
>
The Heretic's Apprentice - SPOILER Thread - (Cadfael #16) by Ellis Peters (Nov/Dec 23)
date
newest »






Penman wrote a 5 book series covering the Plantagenets, they don't seem to be on Kindle although many of her other books are

I quite liked this and enjoyed the lyrical descriptions of the countryside, but yet again we had young lovers who fall for one another at first sight (well, except that they knew each other when she was a child).
I thought the discussions about heresy were quite interesting to start with but then went on and got a bit repetitive. I would have loved to see a picture of the amazing book!
I thought the discussions about heresy were quite interesting to start with but then went on and got a bit repetitive. I would have loved to see a picture of the amazing book!
I found the religious discussions depressing as we don' t seem to have advanced. That said, I enjoyed visiting with Cadfael and his abbey but very glad the visitor left. I've learned to accept, or perhaps ignore, the young lovers and their immediate commitment.
Sorry about the murderer as he seemed a reasonable person caught up by lust for a book, then to find he had killed needlessly. I wonder if the description was based on a real book.
While reading I thought of our earlier discussion of an abridged version. I kept wondering what had been left out; it is a quite short book.
Sorry about the murderer as he seemed a reasonable person caught up by lust for a book, then to find he had killed needlessly. I wonder if the description was based on a real book.
While reading I thought of our earlier discussion of an abridged version. I kept wondering what had been left out; it is a quite short book.

From the bit I listened to, it seemed the abridged bits were descriptions of scenery, buildings, background on the status of the Stephen/Maud conflict, etc.
Susan in NC wrote: From the bit I listened to, it seemed the abridged bits were descriptions of scenery, buildings, background on the status of the Stephen/Maud conflict, etc...."
It would be a shame to lose those bits, Susan - sounds like it is all the period atmosphere that gets lost. Shame they didn't cut out the lovers instead (only joking! I'll shut up about them now.)
It would be a shame to lose those bits, Susan - sounds like it is all the period atmosphere that gets lost. Shame they didn't cut out the lovers instead (only joking! I'll shut up about them now.)

The nature descriptions, and little sketches of abbey life, are what I love about these books, I’d miss those. I could handle less Stephen & Maud; the toing and froing between the warring factions is rather mind-numbing and confusing.
Yes, must admit I find it hard to keep track of the war between Stephen and Empress Maud, but it's often interesting to look up episodes that are mentioned on the web. I know more about that conflict now than I did before reading the Cadfael books, though I still don't know all that much about it.

She wrote several series on the Middle Ages, I think they are all available on Kindle


The Sharon Penman books do look enormous - I'll bear them in mind for a long holiday read. Thank you Keith.

Dorothy was a scholar, she passed all the Oxford exams with honours long before women were awarded Degrees by Oxford and eventually got an M.A. Degree. (In a way, she was lucky, Cambridge women had to wait until 1948 to get Degrees from their university). The quality of her writing shows it too. Her syntax is immaculate compared with the others. Her characters are 'real' three dimensional people, most of the other authors leave their characters as two dimensional 'cutouts' - look at Poirot for example. Christie's plots are very clever but are really just like doing a jigsaw and I get bored. Certainly Peter Wimsey begins as a 'silly ass' but quite quickly develops in to a personality and then is completed by the longterm development with Harriet. Both characters are believable people.


JPW is annoying when she frequently says 'should of' instead of 'should have' or 'should've'.

I read and enjoyed Walsh’s continuation of the Lord Peter series.
Who guessed the right killer in this one? I thought for much of the book that it might be the other young man who wanted to marry Fortunata. I was pleased that I was wrong and there was a more interesting solution.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Sunne in Splendour (other topics)The Heretic's Apprentice (other topics)
Brother Cadfael, 12th-century herbalist, sleuth and sometime cupid, outdoes himself in this, his 16th chronicle, in which Peters imbues the familiar territory of murder, young love and odious villainry with fresh vigor and new subtleties. Elave, young clerk to William of Lythwood, returns from a pilgrimage to the Holy Land with his elderly master's body. His missions are to bury William in his home abbey of St. Peter and St. Paul, and to deliver a dowry to William's adopted daughter Fortunata. But Elave, suspected of harboring views inimical to church doctrine, is held for ecclesiastical trial. And when Aldwin, the Lythwood family clerk hired in Elave's absence, is stabbed to death, Elave is incarcerated not only for heresy, but for murder. Fortunata's dowry, an intricately carved box with mysterious contents, holds the key to the mysteries that spring up around Elave and the Lythwood family. Shrewd and patient, Brother Cadfael is at his best here.
Please feel free to post spoilers in this thread.