Reading the Detectives discussion

Envious Casca (Inspectors Hannasyde & Hemingway, #6)
This topic is about Envious Casca
21 views
Buddy reads > Envious Casca - SPOILER Thread - (June/July 23)

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Susan | 13286 comments Mod
Welcome to our June/July 23 buddy read of Envious Casca Envious Casca (Inspectors Hannasyde & Hemingway, #6) by Georgette Heyer aka as A Christmas Party. Published in 1941 this is the second book in the Inspector Hemingway series and
the ninth book in the Country House Mysteries series.

It is no ordinary Christmas at Lexham Manor. Six holiday guests find themselves the suspects of a murder enquiry when the old Scrooge Nathaniel Herriard, who owns the substantial estate, is found stabbed in the back. Whilst the delicate matter of inheritance could be the key to this crime, the real conundrum is how any of the suspects could have entered the locked room to commit this foul deed. For Inspector Hemingway of Scotland Yard, 'tis the season to find whodunit.

It's a little odd to be reading a Christmas mysteyr in summer, but never mind!

Please feel free to post spoilers in this thread.


message 2: by Jackie (new) - added it

Jackie | 745 comments I am a fan of most Heyer mysteries and this is one of the good ones. I've read it many times and plan to read and respond to folks here in the spoiler thread.

I'm especially interested in the opinions of anyone who hasn't read Heyer before.

I find her mysteries generally have less likeable characters than her romances, but the dialog and humor in this one are both fantastic.

looking forward to what everyone has to say!


Rosina (rosinarowantree) | 1135 comments It is necessary for a lot of the characters in a mystery to be, at least briefly, a potential suspect. This means that even the leading characters must be less amiable than is possible in a romance, unless the lead is the detective, of course.

It's long been one of my favourites too.


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Rosina wrote: "It is necessary for a lot of the characters in a mystery to be, at least briefly, a potential suspect. This means that even the leading characters must be less amiable than is possible in a romance..."

Same here, I often reread at Christmas- I think it’s very honest, I think Uncle Joseph represents the hokey Hallmark Channel Christmas people like to think they remember, but the rest of the annoying characters and conflicts are more realistic! 🤣🤣


message 5: by Jackie (new) - added it

Jackie | 745 comments Yes, very good point about Uncle Joseph. I think He and his wife are very interesting characters, both of them.


Rosina (rosinarowantree) | 1135 comments I think that 'Hallmark Channel Christmas' is not something that would strike the original readers of Envious Casca. Nor am I quite sure what it means.

Uncle Joseph is the Father Christmas in the department store, when I was a child - not so many years after the first publication of the book. Full of HoHoHo and a rather strange smell ...


message 7: by Susan in NC (last edited Jun 16, 2023 08:38AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Rosina wrote: "I think that 'Hallmark Channel Christmas' is not something that would strike the original readers of Envious Casca. Nor am I quite sure what it means.

Uncle Joseph is the Father Christmas in the ..."


Sorry, Rosina - Hallmark Channel is a tv channel over here that churns out a lot of hokey, sentimental Christmas movies! It’s kind of a joke here, as in after a movie bombs at the theater, “look for him next year in a Hallmark Christmas movie”.

I like that, a department store Santa - yes!


message 8: by Jackie (last edited Jun 16, 2023 07:29PM) (new) - added it

Jackie | 745 comments It would take a good actor to play a bad actor, wouldn't it? Uncle Joesph is hard to fully appreciate until it's a re-read.


message 9: by Susan in NC (last edited Jun 16, 2023 08:23PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Jackie wrote: "It would take a good actor to play a bad actor, wouldn't it? Uncle Joesph is hard to fully appreciate until it's a re-read."

Excellent point, Jackie, I never thought of it that way. I thought Heyer did a good job framing the plot, so it seemed that good old Uncle Joe had been around forever, just a sentimental softie - when he was no such thing! On my rereads, I’ve watched for and been much more aware of the way he plants ideas with his seemingly mild blather…


message 10: by Jan C (new) - added it

Jan C (woeisme) | 1820 comments It sounds like I should give this a second chance. Because I am trouble getting into this one. Although maybe I frequently have this problem with Heyer. Hard to get into but a certain point it becomes better.


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Oh, dear, sounds like medicine…;)


message 12: by Jackie (new) - added it

Jackie | 745 comments Jan C wrote: "It sounds like I should give this a second chance. Because I am trouble getting into this one. Although maybe I frequently have this problem with Heyer. Hard to get into but a certain point it beco..."

I don't think I liked it the first time I read it; on re-reads it really improved for me.


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Same here.


message 14: by Jan C (new) - added it

Jan C (woeisme) | 1820 comments You re-read a book you didn't like? Only books I usually re-read are books I enjoyed the first time round.


message 15: by Susan in NC (last edited Jun 18, 2023 12:33PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 5048 comments Jan C wrote: "You re-read a book you didn't like? Only books I usually re-read are books I enjoyed the first time round."

Well, it’s a Heyer group, so I reread it first time to give it another go, once I’d read her other GA mysteries, and realized the obnoxious Bright Young Things weren’t supposed to be likable, they were to add to the dark, almost farcical humor!

I’m older and wiser now, if a group I’m in is reading something I don’t like I skip it!


message 16: by Jackie (last edited Jun 18, 2023 02:16PM) (new) - added it

Jackie | 745 comments Jan C wrote: "You re-read a book you didn't like? Only books I usually re-read are books I enjoyed the first time round."

well, I am now in my 60s and have very different tastes than I did decades ago.

so, yes, I will re-read things I didn't like when I was 25 or 45...

thank goodness, since I didn't like ANY of Heyer's mysteries when I first read them and now I like MOST of them.


back to top