On the Southern Literary Trail discussion

This topic is about
Go Down, Moses
Group Reads archive
>
Initial Impressions: Go Down, Moses, by William Faulkner – May 2023
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Cheryl Carroll
(new)
May 15, 2023 08:34AM

reply
|
flag
Now you're talking my language Cheryl. Knights Gambit was a great book of short stories by Faulkner.

😆 .. and that's as it should be


Or, maybe it would help?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/as-faul...
There is no such thing as bad whiskey,” Faulkner once reasoned...
You see, I usually write at night. I always keep my whiskey within reach; so many ideas that I can’t remember in the morning pop into my head.
To some of his critics (not to mention his rivals), this method was a double-edged sword. During an interview with Hemingway when he was asked if he made himself a pitcher of Martinis before each writing session, Hemingway snorted, “Jeezus Christ! Have you ever heard of anyone who drank while he worked? You’re thinking of Faulkner. He does sometimes—and I can tell right in the middle of a page when he’s had his first one.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/as-faul...
There is no such thing as bad whiskey,” Faulkner once reasoned."
Yeah. But there was an incident, when Faulkner was on one of his infamous benders, and his daughter tried to get him to stop drinking. He looked at her, (presumably) bleary eyed, and (presumably) slurred, "Nobody remembers Shakespear's child." This from the man who wrote The Bear.
Another incident that proves the artist is often the better human than the person is.
(Also applies to Hemingway.)

Your last sentence reminds me of this Faulkner quote:
“Interviewer: Some people say they can't understand your writing, even after they read it two or three times. What approach would you suggest for them?
Faulkner: Read it four times.”

If you're in America, based on those varietals I'm inclined to think that you live in OR, WA, or VA.
Regarding the vineyard that Jill Faulkner Summers son Paul started -- I agree that the focus can be on whatever he wants it to be, but naming it Knight's Gambit does certainly draw the attention of WF fans.
Cathrine also wrote: And let me just say that no way can I combine drinking wine with reading Faulkner.
Or, maybe it would help?
😁😁😁


Randall's great questions colored this reread.
Some of Randall's questions from Message 38 on May 13:
(view spoiler)

@Cathrine - There are some bits of humor that I missed before listening to Merton 😏. (I forgive myself for missing these moments, bc outside of sniffing out the best deals in the grocery store, I did not grow up hunting animals.) The humor- Sam notes that Old Ben is on a recon mission (pg 198) and is so confident in his experience, that he is "Not even running. Walking." 😂
Approaching this read, I feel like Faulkner is presenting a hero's story in retrospect. The retrospect thought gives me, personally, patience for all the build up because there is *so much* build up! Like Virginia Woolf and Cormac McCarthy, they only make sense after the re-reads, but the re-reads are so individually enlightening that most of us fall in love with the writing as a whole.
From an interview with Dr. Ahmed Honeini (UK Faulkner scholar):
Faulkner was aware of how difficult his works could be, saying to Jean Stein in his Paris Review interview with her that one should read each of his novels four times to understand them. Faulkner was, obviously, being playful and humorous here, but there is an element of truth in his advice – works like The Sound and the Fury demand a second reading, especially so you can see how Faulkner pulls off the story of the fall of the Compsons. Imagine Faulkner as a magician: the first time you see him perform, you have no idea how he managed to pull one over on you. When you revisit his work, and you can see how he lures you in, your admiration for him does not diminish. In fact, for many of his readers, the second and subsequent readings of his works are much more rewarding, because you’re not preoccupied with uncovering or deciphering the meaning behind his work – you know what he is up to, so you can savor the profundity of his content and the gorgeousness of his prose, instead of being preoccupied with the technique.
https://fivebooks.com/best-books/will...

You're in very good company, Lexy. That moment when we finally get to sit down with our books = 👌🧡📚 Perfection.

@Cathrine - There are some bits of humor t..."
It was an antholgized version of the longer text. Trouble is I can't remember the anthology and with time my memory might be confusing a general literature anthology with the Vintage edition of Three Famous Short Novels: Spotted Horses / Old Man / The Bear. I remeber enjoying the story though not understanding a quarter of it and the class was essentially dumbfounded as the teacher's lectures added to the confusion rather than enlightening us.
Nor can I remember the exact grade. I remember April Morning: A Novel by Howard Fast; The Red Badge of Courage by Stephen Crane;
The Bear; The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain; The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger; and A Separate Peace by John Knowles and I think that list reflects the order in which we read them from 7-12. In the later grades we had two and one of those was The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald . I think the other was The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne.

That is brilliant news Cheryl! Totally brilliant.. Novels are there forever so you can catch up whenever. Chuffed for you...
Congrats to you both Cheryl. The last 6 weeks of senior year are a whirlwind. Enjoy the accomplishment- his and yours.


For instance - In "The Bear" I am struck by the "deference to elders" theme. It's seen in more than just the Ike / Sam relationship. McCaslin (Cass) allows himself to be overruled by Major de Spain and General Compson. Cass is Ike's cousin, but more like his father. If Faulkner had used one or the other older men for each situation, we could say that Cass's deference was to that particular older man. But it's to all of his elders - Sam, de Spain, and Compson - that Cass listens to.
Perhaps it's WF's way of stating that age / wisdom in humanity is preceded by the age / wisdom of the natural world? From Section 4:
...old Carothers McCaslin, knowing better...[raised] his children, his descendants and heirs, to believe the land was his to hold and bequeath...
...not even a fragment of it [the land] had been his to relinquish or sell pgs 254 - 255, MLA edition
Also in this reread, I'm noticing the repetition of the word "relinquish".
I think it was that way in the past much more so than now Cheryl. Close knit communities and families living in close proximity to each other fostered that respect, but now it seems that distance and modern societies have changed all that.

For instance - In "The Bear" I am struck by the "deference to elders" theme. It's seen in more than just the ..."
I agree with Diane. I see stratification in the novel but it echoed what I saw growing up. Not only was there a hierarchal deference by age, but also by socioeconomic standing, education, and in relation to task at hand, to those with necessary skills. Sam Fathers would have a higher standing for both his age and woodcraft; Major de Spain and General Compson would be defined higher for their still stated military rank, their land ownership, family heritage and wealth, but also their role as employers to the servants. And I see this all as defined by the time more rigidly than in present.

I think Randall's questions about Boon are worth more mention.
First, how did everyone read that Boon's gun was in pieces? I considered it was because of the gun exploding due to either an overcharged shell or an unextracted shell, Both of these would reflect back on sloppy, unprofession handling either of the shell or weapon (shells would be loaded and reloaded at home, not store-bought and dirty weapons were considered the cause of most shells not extracting) This seems to fit with Faulkner's overall picture of Boon.
I see Faulkner having an almost love/hate relationship with the character. Boon has his faults and Faulkner does not seem sympathetic to those faults but then he puts Boon into a heroic place in the novel. In a lot of ways Boon is the obverse of Lucas Beauchamp. But like Randall I wonder what Faulkner felt about Boon. Does he see Boon as an inevitable future of the South or of humankind? Is he the modern hero? Is he Faulkner's Falstaff, a lovable character, but not one to be emulated? He sure caught my attention this read.


I no longer have a copy of my book and can't reread that section, and perhaps putting my own interpretation on that dismantled gun but I saw it as wild nature/life as they knew it coming undone and Boon representing the inability of men to put themselves in check or position to halt the destruction.
To my simple mind, he was the one to kill the bear for love of the dog, not a hero. I really love dogs so I could see myself acting in a similar manner, and have in fact put myself in danger to protect my own. Although, against a bear I would no doubt be a complete coward and run.
(We had a bear in our local Target parking lot this past week. It climbed a tree and was later sedated and relocated. That is not anywhere near a common sight around here).


#1 - as long as I link to this webpage and give proper credit to the commenter, is there any objection to me quoting some of these thoughts and questions with the private WFBC on fb? (later this week, bc again I am still behind on book club tasks)
#2 - my favorite Memorial Day post on that page has become about the Faulkner stories "Two Soldiers" and "Shall Not Perish". Major de Spain features prominently in that second story. His inclusion takes me back to the "elder respect" issue previously mentioned. But in "Shall Not Perish", the mother (the feminine) is the strength that de Spain, her husband, and son look to.
From "Shall Not Perish" -
"All men are capable of shame," Mother said. "Just as all men are capable of courage and honor and sacrifice. And grief too. It will take time, but they will learn it. It will take more grief than yours and mine, and there will be more. But it will be enough. ...
"Wait," said Major de Spain. He had turned again, facing us. "What you and his father gave him. You must know what that was."
"I know it came a long way" Mother said. "So it must have been strong to have lasted through all of us. It must have been all right for him to be willing to die for it after that long time and coming that far. ..."

https://youtu.be/-T8YFnRhFMU

@Connie G - Section 4 of "The Bear" is a highlight in Faulkner's experiment (and ultimate command of!) narrative technique. We, as readers, are pushed from a kind of breathless-hunting-triumph- climax into SoC recollection from Ike, five years after the event. I can't state this with total confidence, but I don't believe this had ever been done before. The jumps between Ike and Cass are just so brilliant!

@Cathrine, Sam, and Randall- Boon is paired up with Lion in section two and / or three. Because of that pairing, for me, it makes Boon's defense of Lion and killing of Old Ben all the more reasonable. Boon's passion for Lion is commendable... I think most of us have had an animal pet that we'd do anything for. Lion was like a person to Boon. He was a terrible shot, but came through physically with his knife when his friend's life mission depended on it.

Books mentioned in this topic
Go Down, Moses (other topics)The Bear (other topics)
April Morning (other topics)
The Red Badge of Courage (other topics)
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Howard Fast (other topics)Stephen Crane (other topics)
Mark Twain (other topics)
J.D. Salinger (other topics)
John Knowles (other topics)
More...