2025 Reading Challenge discussion

This topic is about
Lessons in Chemistry
ARCHIVE 2023
>
Lessons in Chemistry: Reviews by 2022 Reading Challengers
date
newest »


But, and it’s a big but, I found the writing style really off putting and disconcerting. This is a novel which contains a range of horrifying incidents but the distant tone of the narrator left me emotionally detached. I’m also a firm believer in ‘show me don’t tell me’ as an indicator of good writing which is not what happens in this book.
So on balance, it’s a perfectly ok read but not one I would be anxious to revisit in the future.

I will say though that there were glimpses of what this book could have been and maybe that's why I kept with the book.

I agree with you that it had real potential, shame about the execution.

I was unfortunately disappointed with the book, as was the majority of the people in my book club. My main criticisms were...
1) I found the characters to be quite one-dimensional, like Elizabeth's main and only personality trait was being a scientist, as was Calvin's which made the relationship feel slightly forced to me.
2) I know the book is about chemistry, but the book felt so science heavy that at times it almost read as a science textbook, and science seemed to be the answer for everything ( I personally don't have much of an interest in science)
3) The tone seemed to be quite mixed, with the author including some intense scenes on serious subject matter, and lightheartedness, then completely brushing past them to maintain a rather lighthearted tone
4) The feminism in the book felt quite stereotypical and on the surface at times, and the solution felt quite inaccurate for the time period for the sake of being inspiring. It also felt like very white-washed feminism, with the rare comments on race in the time period feeling more like a forced afterthought
It was however quite a quick and easy book to read



(view spoiler)

She said in an interview that the publishers insisted on the cover even though she tried to get them to change it. What would Elizabeth have done in that situation- but of course that’s the difference with real life and a novel.

Oh wow! That's really annoying. Almost like the publishers assume women won't consume the material unless it's wrapped in bubble-headed fluff? Did they READ the book??

I was not blown away by the book itself, but there was a lot in it that I did like, particularly the dog. If it hadn't been for the dog, I may not have stuck with the story. In the end, it was probably the writing style that did not appeal to me.
I can't help but wonder if whether you love or hate this book is tied, at least to some extent, to your enjoyment of romance books. For some reason, I assumed this book was primarily a romance. (Not my preferred genre, but I decided to give it a try.) While Elizabeth and Calvin's relationship is critical to the book, the book really isn't a romance novel. Thus, anyone hoping for more steamy romance and less sexist workplace commentary is likely to be disappointed.

However, Elisabeth looks unrealistic to me, as well as other characters. I didn’t like how all of them are oversimplified to fit in one description as scientist, child-genius, lusty boss, lying priest etc. Adding rowing as trait doesn't really help to make characters more depth. But at least it was funnier to read, imagining all this erging.
Generally, I prefer happy endings, but this one doesn’t work for me.(view spoiler)

Speaking of which, I adored the inclusion of all the chemical reactions involved with cooking. I love to cook and would appreciate a show/podcast that explained such interactions! Perhaps there are some out there and I've just never thought to search! That will be a project for the near future!
Who couldn't love Mad? And Wakely? And Harriet? Hell, I adored all of the characters who were just trying to make more of their lives without oppressing others!
The twist at the end was gratifying and hopeful!
I will definitely plan to read anything Garmus writes in the future!
Please make sure to mark your spoilers by typing [spoiler] at the start and [/spoiler] at the end but replacing the [] with <>.