The Shining
discussion
Should I read it again
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Gene
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 10, 2015 12:50PM

reply
|
flag

I would not be able to let it be, I would just have to know :-) I'm fairly certain that if you have gotten to dislike King over the years you probably won't love it in any way as much as the teenage you, but instead surely be annoyed with certain traits and trademarks in his writing. But what's to lose anyway? It's fairly short and worst case you will hate it - but still be aware that you loved it as a teen.


Not to be argumentative in any way, but I'd like to point out that if I was to discard works that were produced when the artist was under some kind of intoxication, I would throw out most of my books and probably close to all of my music...

I was going to say maybe he should go back to writing while intoxicated.
I quit reading King when I realized he telegraphed every single character's death well before they died.

But, since it's been years for you, you very well may want to read it once more, especially as an adult—and definitely if you have children.
Why? It seems to me that the novel is less about a haunted hotel and more about a 'worst case scenario' for a father.
What is incredibly underplayed in Kubrick's film is the NECESSITY that Jack do well in the job in order to save his family.
Whatever you decide, good reading!
—R

But, since it's been years for you, you very well may want to read it once more, especially as an adult—and definitely if you have children..."
A very good point I would say. As for the "Book vs. Movie"-debate, I've never been too bothered with that. The book is an amazing feat by a young writer and quite unique in many ways, the movie is one of the best works of an amazing filmmaker. Yes, the latter is an adaption of the former, but it's really not the same story. Kubrick did things that work on screen and other, intentional or unintentional, deviations from the original story. But I've never felt that one diminishes the other.

Ditto Thomas.
Very much in agreement. Different media; and, Kubrick did what he had to do for that medium.
Good reading.
—R
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic