Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Questions (not edit requests)
>
Amazon destroyed the author's database.
message 601:
by
Liralen
(new)
Jun 30, 2023 10:48AM

reply
|
flag


It’s not: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/... - but Tiag⊗ is the only one that can edit the title and so far hasn't done it.


Now I've tried several combinations of the following to no avail: entering a librarian note, removing it, removing the description, entering text in the change comment field, and doing nothing but setting the status to Public. Am i missing anything here?
(I've noticed the librarian note left by the bot reads "librarian note for this nilclass", instead of the usual "librarian note for this book", so maybe this is something we cannot fix at all?)


This is the entry:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/edit/1...


This is the entry:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/edit/1......"
There is no space between the dot after the link and The in the librarian note. If you add a space I think it will be OK.

Doing so has no effect. As above, I even tried removing the librarian note entirely. I do so in these instances because the note is meaningless. This is a Kindle edition which doesn't relate to ISBNs anyway.
I think Javier's observing that the first words of the note are different. "librarian note for this nilclass"
Do we know what a "nilclass" is? It probably means Deleted.

Doing so has no effect."
Then it is the same problem I mentioned before*: some ACE notes are not accepted due to how the URL is formed.
*I mean in the other thread started by Liralen: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...


*I mean in the other thread started by Liralen …
I was interpreting your comment in that thread to be URLs in the description, not in the librarian note. I have never seen the system have an objection to a URL in the librarian note.

*I mean in the other thread started by Liralen …
I was interpreting your comment in that thread to be URLs in the desc..."
It happens in both, but not all the time.

Adding spaces or removing the note doesn't seem to work, also no "do not include links to other pages" error :/
This reminded me of the week before the Status drop-down menu was implemented, when un-NABbing a book was ineffective as entries were marked as Invalid but we hadn't any means to change status back. Maybe there's some option only devs or staff can access atm. I'm reporting the entry to staff then.

It means slopping programming, bad code reviews, and poor release methodology.
Goodreads is giving me PTSD flashbacks to the horrible software company that I once worked for. I quit because I had no power to fix anything (I was the technical writer) but couldn't stop caring about the software errors, lack of testing, and bad management. They wouldn't even let me write snarky release notes.
Edit to cross out my assumption that the internal error appeared to a librarian. It didn't. Sorry! But this is still a bug that testing should have discovered before release.

It means slopping programming, bad code reviews, and poor release methodology. An internal error like this should NEVER appear in the u..."
Commiserations :(

*click*
just in case"
First I have to make sure every one of my 1800 books is correct...

Edit; Exactly the same pink screen as Javier posted in #651

They've probably had a bellyful of our complaints. 🤣


It means slopping programming, bad code reviews, and poor release methodology. An internal error like this should NEVER appear in the u..."
Commiserations :(."
+1K
I too was a tech writer. It was always trouble when Marketing drove Development.

It means slopping programming, bad code reviews, and poor release methodology. An internal error...
...always trouble when Marketing drove Development."
and if not Marketing then there's always that bright executive...

Tech-writer fist bump! I agree 1000%.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
https..."
Arrgghh! I thought they had assured us the bots wouldn't do that to human-edited records?

Arrgghh! I thought they had assured us the bots wouldn't do that to human-edited records?"
Human edited the ASIN/ISBN.
BadBot edited status.
Don't think the assurance was meant to apply to whole book record, just to field edited by human and not sure that's 100% guaranteed never to happen.

ETA I do wonder what it is that triggers the bot to delete valid records.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/......"
I've seen the bots create an edition and immediately afterwards delete it, but that was visible in the log. I have not seen them create an edition that they marked 'deleted' at the same time.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/......"
I think there is often no record in the log when the bot deletes a record. I have been finding empty librarian logs when I've been merging authors. I'm pretty sure this is because the bot created an edition with, for instance a 2-space author, and then deleted the editons, leaving the edition blank.
I am impressed that some are finding these deleted editions. According to all released information, the only way to find these is by trying to add an edition with the ASIN/ISBN. When I have asked support to move an ASIN/ISBN-10, I leave the record open to assure myself that the now empty edition is deleted. Sometimes they do it, and sometimes I have to do it.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/...
amazon_catalog automatically deleted the books with ISBN!
You, the administrators of Goodreads, please stop the amazon_catalog killing the catalogs especially for the non-English books.
If you do nothing, you will let the amazon_catalog destroy Goodreads.

If you do nothing, you will let the amazon_catalog destroy Goodreads."
I doubt the people responsible will see your plea here. You could contact Support: https://www.goodreads.com/about/conta... (not that it will do much good, since after a myriad of complaints they still let the bots go on)

https://www.goodreads.com/author/edit...
Or here where the log says "amazon_com created the book". But which book?
https://www.goodreads.com/author/edit...

Since

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/......"
I have noticed this as well. Several authors have complained that their brand new book has been deleted, but I see nothing for that action in the log.

That's exactly what they are doing. Authors are trying to add their books because they think they aren't here, and they can't. So then we have to try to do the same thing to find the invisible record and fix it.


Yes, it's part of the new design.
Also, no search results are shown when I type the ASIN into the search bar at the top of the Goodreads page (as if there were no results).
I've noticed this as well. Then I try to add the book and it says it's already there in public status.

The new book page does not display the ASIN and never has. It also doesn't show the Edition field. That information can be found on the Other Editions page with Expand Details.

"
Thanks, Scott. I am in the process of rescuing dozens of editions of The Brothers Karamazov. I may go to another title afterward.

Yes, it's part of the new design.
Also, no search results are shown when I type the ASIN i..."
oh ok. then i apparently didn't notice the missing ASIN on the book page until now, since the amazon bots are causing such a mess with the ISBN/ASINs.

And, so I think "what's the point?"
I. give. up.

And, so I think "what's the point?"
I. give. up."
You lasted longer than some of us.

I do plan to still use it, but I don't know for how long. My primary reading group may go by the wayside and if that happens ...

It is beyond sad how they have ruined a wonderful thing.

Yes. I said upthread I thought Goodreads is now worth more than they paid Otis for it. I don't think Otis got out at the top and it may still be worth more now. But at the rate they're going it will be worthless by this time next year.


I'm not sure. I may just use the exported file in Excel. It will also open in a Google sheet.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Louis Vuitton: Catwalk (other topics)Louis Vuitton: Catwalk (other topics)
Impact of Inoculum on Startup Characteristics of a Simulated, Anaerobic Bioreactor Landfill (other topics)
The Hamlet (other topics)
Hamlet (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
たもつ 葉子 (other topics)紗与イチ (other topics)
Unknown Author (other topics)
Jo Ellison (other topics)
Author (other topics)
More...