The Mookse and the Gripes discussion

This topic is about
Still Born
International Booker Prize
>
2023 Int Booker shortlist - Still Born
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Hugh, Active moderator
(new)
-
added it
Mar 14, 2023 04:25AM


reply
|
flag

Can certainly see why others liked it, and in many respects the novel is a gripping and powerful exploration of motherhood, and indeed of what it means to live.
But the writing - didn't work for me at all.
My reservation is the prose style, where powerful passages come between pages of relatively quotidian story. Perhaps that is deliberate - even dealing (I suspect no spoiler alert needed) with a severely handicapped child - has its elements of routine, but it meant a 203 page novel felt too long.
The narrative perspective was also odd - a favourite bugbear of mine - with Laura's story in the first person, and Alina's narrated by her in the third, but with little difference between them (Laura forming at times the role more of an omniscient third person narrator).
Would be disappointed if there aren't 6 better books (indeed I've already read 3 better ones from the list).

I was at the time of reading living next to some severely noisy neighbours and remember finding a lot to relate in the novel, though in the novel the neighbours are met with more compassion than I managed to uphold (and indeed I moved out).

I was at the time of reading living next to some severely noisy neighbours and remember finding a lot to relate in the novel, th..."
I've been in that situation too, also moved! But I found this convincing on a number of levels, have a friend whose child has very similar issues to the child in the book - massive failure by the medical team during childbirth - and thought this was a very accurate portrayal of the dilemmas and emotions involved.




I initially read your comment on my phone where words were missing. Still thinking I might need to revisit this.

I'm not sure myself either. The language is not complex and it's not a novel of ideas, two things I admire in literature, but there's a certain propulsive quality to the narrative. For example, I couldn't wait to find out about the boy in the apartment next door. The reveal was a bit of a disappointment, but still. There's a chance I may change my mind though as I haven't read more than half of it.


The first party sections dragged it down for me and the pigeon and cuckoo were very heavy handed I felt.
3.5 stars so top of my longlist rankings so far.



This from an interview
Laura uses the expression “human shackles” because – at least in the way it is practised today in western societies – motherhood limits, binds and sometimes even mutilates women’s lives and freedom. All the burden, responsibility and moral weight falls on their shoulders, while men can just disappear or show up from time to time without any social consequences. I think that the solution resides in collectivity. For centuries humans raised children this way. Families were far more extended than they are now, so women weren’t so alone.
There was always another woman – friend, sister, mother, aunt – to look after the child in case the mother fell ill, had to work, or lacked the psychological conditions. Some women adore children’s company but don’t want to give birth, and collective raising allows them to participate in motherhood without having to be biological mothers. I am not inventing anything new. It is just a coming back to a practice and common sense that we lost at some point, but this time I suggest we make sure that men participate as well!


As always, well done! Maybe we have similar tastes in literature. 🤔

As always, well done! Maybe we have similar tastes in literature. 🤔"
Thanks!

I was the opposite and liked that it wasn’t just a book about not wanting children/wanting children but I didn’t see Laura as raising a child, rather a short time carer in his life. We’ve had periods in our family where an extra child has fallen into our care but then they’ve moved on.
Alina’s life with her husband, post devastating diagnosis and subsequent birth was so well depicted. Having a few friends who have had children with life limiting diseases I thought Nettel showed the love and value these little lives bring to families that those on the outside don’t always see.

I think we're culturally in danger of this becoming a polarizing issue: to have children/not have children, to be a mother/reject motherhood. So I liked the nuance offered here and the complexity of a woman not wanting children of her own but still being shown to be nurturing and caring under different conditions.
It's not unlike those of us who may not want our own kids but are adoring aunts and special friends to the kids of our best friends.

When I read the description of Still Born I sent a copy to a young friend whose wedding we’re attending in a few weeks, she and her partner decided they don’t want to have kids and her mother, aunt, and sisters don’t believe her, they tell her she’ll change her mind, though nothing in my conversations with her points to her changing her mind, so I was hoping for a book that showed women having a fulfilling, meaningful life that does not include raising children. Alina and Laura were not adoring aunts, one had a child and one took on the care of a child in need, which is not the role aunts of well parented children play.
I feel I should stress that I thought it was a good book, just not what I thought it was going to be, which is no fault of the author or book.

I like the way it's moving towards a spectrum of femininity rather than extreme positions of all-encompassing motherhood vs. the stereotype of the cold, uncaring 'career woman'. As women, we're more complicated than that and I feel that's acknowledged in the book.


Is not that though the kind of sweeping generalisation you are elsewhere arguing against.
It simply was not true at all for me or many people I know - particularly but not exclusively men - and changing their mind in their thirties in both directions as their lives and relationships changed.



https://capsulenz.com/think/opinion/w...

My experience is quite different in Australia and it’s less of an issue although the things said about our first female Prime Minister, childless by choice, were ordinary at best. I do appreciate why you wanted this to be that book though.
Thanks for sharing that article, Yahaira, it does highlight the lack of books available. I still believe for Laura this was short term and did not make her regret sterilisation although she did ‘mother’ for a bit. This article with Nettel is also good:
https://www.anothermag.com/design-liv...


Great comment. As refreshing as it was a few years ago to read something like Die, My Love, it's nice to see a book like this explore these issues on a spectrum.

Yes, this, thanks, GY, and thanks for the articles, Yahaira and Lou.
Few statements apply to everyone and I don’t think most adults make a firm decision to parent or not in their 20s, but I do think most young adults kinda know if they do want to raise kids or are open to the idea of parenting if life goes that way for them, or they know they are not.
And I think there is range of how well thought out that decision is. I know couples for whom the decision was one they came to after discussing the ethics of bringing more humans into a crowded planet and couples that just never saw themselves as parents and realized that they were free to choose not to.
There is still a lot of pressure on women to have children (even though our healthcare and postnatal treatment of women and babies is awful,) and the assumption is that women have an innate maternal nature. I don’t think single childless men are as suspect as single or married childless women.
We’ve had a number of books recently about women who’ve gone mad after becoming mothers, we have books about happy mothers, depressed mothers, and books about depressed or happy women in which motherhood was never discussed; Still Born is very good book about the different ways women can mother, now we need the books about women who made the conscious decision not to give birth or to raise children, how that decision colored their lives and show them as fulfilled, productive happy adults.


It can be rather different for women. Women aged 35 and over who get pregnant are classed as 'geriatric mothers'. And although women are increasingly opting to get pregnant post 35, the process is harder and there are a number of associated health risks both to the expectant mother and the prospective child. And women are often made acutely aware of these issues at a much earlier age, and that can direct them to think about these things much earlier too.


Absolutely and part of that pressure linked to the idea that we have to decide before it's physically too late or more risky/less certain, something that doesn't impact men in the same way.

I was decidedly mixed on the book itself. I really liking the themes, I was neutral about the writing, but some of the areas of focus (the pigeons and helping her neighbours) felt quite clunky to me.
In searching for interviews I discovered this was also selected for Dua Lipa's bookclub this year so I guess it's been getting some new press. I really appreciated the piece Nettel recently wrote regarding her inspiration. Apparently the pigeon thing was real too! Ha!
https://www.service95.com/guadalupe-n...
Books mentioned in this topic
Boulder (other topics)Still Born (other topics)