Horror Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
What Moves the Dead
Group Reads
>
March 2023 Group Read #1 - What Moves the Dead by T. Kingfisher
date
newest »

message 101:
by
destiny ♡
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 07, 2023 12:01PM

reply
|
flag

On the other hand, after just completing “Fall of the House of Usher” and this being marketed as a retelling of that story, I was a little let down with how it ended. I am glad that I read the Author’s notes at the end though because that gave some clarity as to why she went in the direction she did and I learned things about Poe that I didn’t know before reading this novel.
3.5 out of 5 stars for me and I am glad that I was able to get around to reading this!
Jessica wrote: "Finished this last night and I am torn. On the one hand, for my first Kingfisher novel, I really enjoyed it. She created a wonderfully creepy atmosphere, it was an easy read (and a quick read even ..."
With a "retelling", I never know how it will go for me ahead of time. I really enjoyed a couple of her original novels prior to this one, and I think that helped for myself. Whenever an author takes a new approach to a classic, it's bound to be "hit or miss" for a lot of readers.
With a "retelling", I never know how it will go for me ahead of time. I really enjoyed a couple of her original novels prior to this one, and I think that helped for myself. Whenever an author takes a new approach to a classic, it's bound to be "hit or miss" for a lot of readers.


hahaha. I believe autocorrect got you again. We can only hope the spinach, tomatoes and feta would improve them."
In deed it did. One of the main reasons I dislike typing anything from my phone. I'm normally a huge fan of fried or stuffed mushrooms., but after reading this I might be turned off them for a few days. However I do plan on trying the ones I described as soon as my chickenism wears off

Agreed. I think being familiar with the original premise is a disadvantage this this book (and in most other retellings) because you already have a sense of how it'll end and who will die/survive. I was able to enjoy the middle section (45-70% progress) the most because it introduced the most originality, and while I didn't feel surprised at any point in time, I could at least enjoy some suspense during those parts.
Seems like quite a few of us came into this book having read Fall of the House of Usher. Wondering if for those who had not, if you experienced any moments of surprise or an unexpected twist?
Pat of Rocks wrote: "Kimberly wrote: With a "retelling", I never know how it will go for me ahead of time.
Agreed. I think being familiar with the original premise is a disadvantage this this book (and in most other r..."
Exactly! Normally, the "retellings" that I enjoy the most are ones I had never heard the original of, and go into "blindly". Without any preconceived notions, it's easier to just enjoy the author's style. At least with this one--as you pointed out--the middle section was the "author's own", and it showed.
Agreed. I think being familiar with the original premise is a disadvantage this this book (and in most other r..."
Exactly! Normally, the "retellings" that I enjoy the most are ones I had never heard the original of, and go into "blindly". Without any preconceived notions, it's easier to just enjoy the author's style. At least with this one--as you pointed out--the middle section was the "author's own", and it showed.

Agreed. I think being familiar with the original premise is a disadvantage this this book (and in most other r..."
That's an interesting thought to me! The original story is my favorite piece of Poe's work and I actually felt like loving the original so much was part of what made this retelling work so well for me (it was one of my favorite reads of 2022).

I'm glad that resonated with you so well with you! I agree she did well with keeping the depressing and ominous mood of the original intact, so I can see why you liked it.


Only about 20 pages in, but definitely nails the Gothic vibe.


My full review below...
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

My full review below...
https:..."
wow! That is so cool! I never got to this. I have it on kindle. This month has turned out to be much busier than I planned for. Doing a lot of audiobooks tho! Glad to see your 5 stars. I will likely read this later in the year.




Not quite as far but I feel the same way, like dread is building which I appreciate.


oh no lol..

The explanations are over, but it comes back a couple times later.
Just remember Va/Van/Vas is a child, and when it comes out of left field the sucker punch will land properly.
Agree it was mostly fluff and unnecessary for my enjoyment of the actual story, but if it made people who don't feel represented happy, I can't really complain. Enjoyed the story regardless.

T. Kingfisher: And ages ago, I had read about a group of people in the Balkans in I believe in Albania is where they mostly live now, where they develop this, what I thought was the most fabulous work around too, women could not inherit property. And that was not a law that they can change. But because they, like many people in many cultures, tended to have fairly high attrition among the young men because of a lot of inter group violence. They were like, Okay, but what if we just make more men, so you could take an oath, and if you were born female, you were now a man, and that was it, you could just swear it out. And for all intents and purposes, you are now male, you can hold property, you can engage in blood feuds, and whatever, it was never treated as a gender identity issue among them, possibly because you know, this practice was largely started centuries ago, and that was not nearly as much thing. It was a logistical one. And so you would have mothers who were widowed and didn’t have any sons and are like, Okay, I can’t have a household. I can’t own property. I have to go live with my in-laws, and that’s going to suck. But I have a daughter. And so there are these reports of mothers begging their daughters to become sons so that they don’t have to go live with their in-laws. And they would be like, yes. Okay, and to honor the oath, and at that point, you’re a dude. That is, you have all the rights and responsibilities, you are not treated any differently. Here’s your sword and have fun. And the thing is, while this is certainly not, Alex’s military is not version of that in Gallatia soldiers amount to a third sex more or less they get they get a second set of primaries as an honorific. But it was the practical workaround of it that I loved the and so it was like, well, we need soldiers, and traditionally only men have become soldiers and we knew that but we’re really running low and somebody just showed up and all the paperwork says their pronouns would be called con, because that’s what soldiers are. So yeah, just give him a rifle and put them on the frontlines, and we’ll worry about it after the war is over. Yeah. And that was how I got there.

Thanks for sharing that interesting background about how Kingfisher developed the history of the protagonist!

This is so fascinating, thank you for sharing!

I adore Poe, and reading What Moves the Dead made me feel so nostalgic about his work, but still, T. Kingfisher does an excellent job with this retelling of the classic The Fall of the House of Usher.
(view spoiler)

Bridgette wrote: "I finished this a couple weeks ago I believe and I can not stop thinking about it. Probably one of my favorites I’ve read this year. It has inspired me to creat a painting based off the rabbits and..."
I'd love to see that!!!
I'd love to see that!!!

I think we'd all love to see it!

I realised it's a retelling of Poe's story so now I have to read that again, so have ordered a copy.
Hopefully I can start on Thursday when I'm done with the Poe version.

(view spoiler)


I’m hoping I can start it later tonight, when I finish my current read.

Bridgette, I would also love to see the painting!

This is a lot of firsts for me! It's my first time participating in the group read and my first time reading T. Kingfisher. I ended up listening to the audiobook version of the story and I have to admit, it took a while for me to actually get into the story. There could have been a lot of factors that could have affected my ability to pay attention but I eventually started to really get into the story. It's been a while since I've read Poe's story but I had some vague recollections while reading this. By the end of it, I really dug it. I really like T's writing style and the imagery of the rabbit dissection really gave me the creeps.
I look forward to reading along with you all again!

One of my favorite quotes that will also stay with me:
(view spoiler)

You need to watch the horror movie Smile, if you haven’t already. Quite creepy.

This book reminded me a lot of Leech by Hiron Ennes. I actually thought more about Leech while reading this than The Fall of the House of Usher!! I did like Leech just a bit more, maybe because that story was so unique.
I loved the gothic atmosphere, and the hares were indeed creepy.
The pronouns did not bother me. I did think the va/van was unnecessary.

But I’m definitely willing to check out more books by T. Kingfisher after this so that’s a plus!
I think this was my first ever spore horror read so that was also really fun c: I loved the descriptions of the hares and learning more about the spore network

You need to watch the horror movie..."
Thanks Kelly. I did see Smile and was pleasantly surprised since I didn't think the previews were great. Definitely creepy.

I spent the time up to the point with the hares constantly thinking 'why is this a retelling'. The original was such a short, sharp read it didn't need to be expanded into this book.
It dipped abit after the hares and then took off into a totally different book, which was great.
I enjoyed it but it would have been better telling it'a own story rather than being an update

