Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

Louise de La Vallière (Trilogie des Mousquetaires #3.2)
This topic is about Louise de La Vallière
194 views
Book & Author Page Issues > (Reopened....someone recombined them) Please separate incorrectly combined books

Comments Showing 1-36 of 36 (36 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lauren (last edited Feb 23, 2023 03:48PM) (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments The Oxford edition of "Louise de la Vallière" does not match the free Amazon edition. This is because they are part of a much larger work, Le Vicomte de Bragelonne ou Dix ans plus tard, and it has not been divided in the same way: the Oxford edition covers chapters 93-178 of the original text, while the Amazon edition covers chapters 141-207 of the original text.

Please separate them from one another.

Amazon edition (ASIN B0083Z4PTQ):
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

Oxford editions:
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6...
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
- https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...

It's unclear whether the other editions match one or the other, though it is likely that they use the public domain text and thus follow the Amazon breakdown; therefore, I would tentatively suggest removing merely the Oxford editions.

(If you're interested, this is part of a larger cleanup of the Three Musketeers series: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...)


message 2: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can anyone help with this?


message 3: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Anyone?


message 4: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can someone please help with this?


message 5: by Deborah (new)

Deborah Brown (wildredcurls) | 38 comments Please remove In Over Her Head from
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show...

And Theft in Paradise from
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

And add both to my page
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show...

Thank you. Deborah


message 6: by Scott (new)

Scott | 8586 comments Deborah wrote: "Please remove In Over Her Head from
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show...

And Theft in Paradise from
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

And add both to my page"


Done.


message 7: by Lauren (last edited Mar 07, 2023 10:51AM) (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Scott wrote: "Done."

To clarify, the original request is still open.


message 8: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can someone please help with this?


message 9: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Please?


message 10: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Is anyone able to help with this?


message 11: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Anyone?


message 12: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can someone please help with this?


message 13: by Saturn (last edited Apr 17, 2023 03:04AM) (new)

Saturn (xsaturn) | 648 comments I've separated all oxford editions but this one:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...

I checked more than once but I can't find it in the separate tool


message 14: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Saturn wrote: "I've separated all oxford editions but this one:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...

I checked more than once but I can't find it in the separate tool"


Thank you for helping with this!

That edition of Louise de la Vallière happens to be the most popularly shelved of all editions—perhaps this means it can't be separated out, or that it needs to be done by a Superlibrarian? I can move the thread if necessary.


message 15: by Emily (new)

Emily | 17473 comments Jennifer wrote: "Saturn wrote: "I've separated all oxford editions but this one"

The default edition will not appear in the separate tool.
Unfortunately all of the editions have to be separated as a group from it rather than separating it from everything else. I don't think there is a shortcut to doing that unless someone else knows something I don't.


message 16: by Saturn (new)

Saturn (xsaturn) | 648 comments Emily wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "Saturn wrote: "I've separated all oxford editions but this one"

The default edition will not appear in the separate tool.
Unfortunately all of the editions have to be separated a..."


Oh, thanks! Now it makes sense!


message 17: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Saturn wrote: "Emily wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "Saturn wrote: "I've separated all oxford editions but this one"

The default edition will not appear in the separate tool.
Unfortunately all of the editions have to ..."


I know it's a ton of work, but are you still able to separate the default version out? Since it's the most popularly shelved edition of that version of the book, it really is crucial that it be separated from the non-Oxford editions.


message 18: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Bumping again


message 19: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can anyone help with this?


message 20: by Saturn (new)

Saturn (xsaturn) | 648 comments Jennifer wrote: "I know it's a ton of work, but are you still able to separate the default version out? Since it's the most popularly shelved edition of that version of the book, it really is crucial that it be separated from the non-Oxford editions."

Here I am. I did it. I think everything should be ok now.

https://www.goodreads.com/work/editio...


message 21: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Saturn wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "I know it's a ton of work, but are you still able to separate the default version out? Since it's the most popularly shelved edition of that version of the book, it really is cruci..."

Lovely, thank you so much for your hard work! Only, would you please move the Amazon edition (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...) to the non-Oxford records (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8...)? While I am not sure that the Amazon edition matches those other records, nor that those other records match each other, I do know that it does not match the Oxford edition. (Or it could be separated into a record by itself, but as Amazon is based on the public domain version I think it is probable that many of those other records match the Amazon version. None of them are very popular on Goodreads when compared with the Oxford edition, either.)


message 22: by Saturn (new)

Saturn (xsaturn) | 648 comments Someone combined them. However, I'm afraid that other editions will still be added automatically in the future.


message 23: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Saturn wrote: "Someone combined them. However, I'm afraid that other editions will still be added automatically in the future."

Ugh. Well, I guess it can't be helped, and you're right that any new editions will probably be added to the most popular (the Oxford) edition. Is it possible to add any sort of librarian's note to hopefully prevent anyone from combining them manually?

Thanks again for fixing this!


message 24: by Saturn (new)

Saturn (xsaturn) | 648 comments I added the note yesterday, but I think it won't prevent new additions by the bot.


message 25: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Saturn wrote: "I added the note yesterday, but I think it won't prevent new additions by the bot."

Thank you!


message 26: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Someone has re-combined them. Ugh.

Would another librarian please separate them out?

Perhaps they will be less likely to be combined in the future if they are added to separate series (which GR has confirmed would be appropriate), as I've suggested here: https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...


message 27: by Arenda (new)

Arenda | 26448 comments Jennifer wrote: "Perhaps they will be less likely to be combined in the future if they are added to separate series"

No, that won't help, as that is not visible on the combine page.


message 28: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Can anyone help with this?


message 29: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Arenda wrote: "Jennifer wrote: "Perhaps they will be less likely to be combined in the future if they are added to separate series"

No, that won't help, as that is not visible on the combine page."


Shame. Out of curiosity, do you know what would happen if someone combined books from two different series? Would it mess everything up, or would those different editions still be a part of each separate series?


message 30: by Scott (new)

Scott | 8586 comments A series includes all editions of a work.


message 31: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Scott wrote: "A series includes all editions of a work."

So the system would just…pick one?


message 32: by Scott (new)

Scott | 8586 comments If you mean which edition shows on the series page, it is the most popular.


Elizabeth (Alaska) Scott wrote: "If you mean which edition shows on the series page, it is the most popular."

Can you not add to the series by ISBN/ASIN?


message 34: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments Scott wrote: "If you mean which edition shows on the series page, it is the most popular."

No, that is not what I mean. I mean "what would happen if someone combined books from two different series?".


message 35: by Scott (new)

Scott | 8586 comments Jennifer wrote: "No, that is not what I mean. I mean "what would happen if someone combined books from two different serie..."

It would show on both series pages, of course.


message 36: by Lauren (new)

Lauren | 2157 comments I emailed support and they're in the process of correcting this.


back to top