2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

This topic is about
Devil in Disguise
Devil in Disguise
>
Question O
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 13, 2022 05:38AM

reply
|
flag


Merritt's pregnancy was not a surprise. Why is it that everytime a widow mentions that she is barren, she gets pregnant by the end of the book?

Merritt's pregnancy wasn't a surprise to me either. Back then often when a woman was labeled barren, it was actually the man's fault. Doctors didn't want to crush their tender male egos by telling them they can't have children, so they blamed the wife.

I’m glad I’d already read Wallflowers as three of the books in this series tied to that one directly. I loved this story and its connection but just wish the series had ended on a Ravenel note.
They’d done a good job in diagnosing Merritt’s problems (I believe it’s defined as endometriosis) and her condition made it difficult to get pregnant, not impossible. She and Keir had a lot of sex and in inventive ways, which increased her possibilities. It’s plausible.
They’d done a good job in diagnosing Merritt’s problems (I believe it’s defined as endometriosis) and her condition made it difficult to get pregnant, not impossible. She and Keir had a lot of sex and in inventive ways, which increased her possibilities. It’s plausible.

I have it, too. My sister-in-law has it and believed she couldn’t have children either. She got a nice surprise when she turned 40!


Regarding the barren/pregnancy, I'm also not a fan of the "magic sperm" trope.
Sometimes it is done well though with an appropriate explanation such as it is the 1st husband who is infertile and the heroine has been unjustly blamed or the endometriosis here, which is actually the first I've read about in an historical romance.