Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Questions (not edit requests)
>
ISBN10 repeated in the ASIN field in a lot of books
date
newest »


I was in the middle of doing the adding new books from Aug 1, so I didn't pursue it as I only saw 1.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
For physical books, in many cases the ASIN and the ISBN10 will be the same.

Since when ISBN10 = ASIN ?
I don't understand
The strange thing is that support has always replied that they had deleted the duplicated ISBN10

Perhaps this refers to how Amazon stores the information in their database. I'm not sure that the import process would then be identified as "deleted user". Still, if you are beginning to see several/many such instances I tend to think this is part of a GR process.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
For physical books, in many cases the ASIN and the ISBN10 will be the same."
Yes, I took that to mean that the ISBN10 is repeated in the ASIN field, so in line with what Moloch is seeing.
(Better than the other way around!)

So, is this an error that should be reported or expected behavior (I have no idea why they decided that ISBN10 = ASIN, but at least if it's ok I can stop emailing support about it)?

From what Rivka posted, this is expected behavior and doesn't need to be reported.


Perhaps not everyone knows of the new procedure. I think repeating the ISBN10 in the ASIN field doesn't hurt anything.


https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
where in the 2nd paragraph it says:
For physical books, in many cases the ASIN and the ISBN10 will be the same.

I'll report it to Support, as it doesn't make sense that the isbn10 can't be added to the isbn10 field on this book.

ok, your support team doesn't seem to be aware of this


Yes, I had the same thing with a book record.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
example: https://i.postimg.cc/fLWTLH3s/975.jpg
Lately I am finding a lot of books with this error, and I'm starting to think it's not a "human" error by some librarian, but some script that is making a mess.
It's a "weird" edit for a human librarian
Looking at the log, this edit is attributed to a "deleted user" (in the last couple of books I've found, I don't know if it's always like this)
I have reported all the books I've found to support, but I'm getting tired and above all I don't know if it's a useless effort