The Mookse and the Gripes discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Booker Prize for Fiction
>
2023 Booker Prize speculation
message 851:
by
David
(new)
Jul 01, 2023 09:04AM

reply
|
flag

https://youtu.be/cfTuQ_jZtrU
I'll put the list under a spoiler, in case anyone would prefer to watch the video:
(view spoiler)
Not sure how confident I am in this, but I think it would make for an interesting and varied list.
It also seems like a given that at least one book in every predictions video I make will be ineligible, so I can't wait to find out which one that is!

I suppose we can take this out of spoilers for those on the digital site. The question is whether Grimmish has a UK publisher. I knew about Coach House (Canadian), but it sounds like Peninsula published it in the UK.

One Australian author who doesn’t have a UK publisher is Jen Craig which is baffling. Would be an extremely strong contender if any of her books became eligible. In my top 3 favourite English language contemporary authors.

August Blue
Kick the Latch
This Other Eden
Soldier Sailor
Fire Rush
For Thy great pain have Mercy on My Little Pain
Be Mine
Victory City
Cuddy
In Memoriam
Yellowface
Soldier Sailor and Cuddy are the two stand out novels for me this year so far.
Anyone read The Bee Sting?

I’ve read The Bee Sting - I’d be surprised if it were longlisted. It’s not bad, but it’s overlong, some sections drag massively, and it doesn’t quite come together as a whole. There are good things about it, but it’s not one I’d particularly recommend and it overstays its welcome. Also another supposedly funny novel that I didn’t find very many laughs in, and instead found quite stressful!

I'm jumping in on the conversation a bit late so apologies if what I say has already been said.
I think it is worth reinforcing that publishing is a two way relationship in you have the author to publisher and then publisher to reader.
Whilst the public continue to purchase certain types of books ( for eg the recent overwhelming number of Greek myth retellings) then publishers are going to continue to acquire them. Very few publishers are run on altruistic ideals and even small indy ones need to make money to survive.
Also worth including the role of agents in all this who are not only seeking the best deal for their authors but obviously for themselves too.
Those of us on here are, in truth, just an extreme niche within the wider book buying public. Your point about wanting a good read is well made and most relevant in the mind of a great many people who buy or read books in the UK. The sales reflect this and therefore so does the world of publishing. Publishers are presented with dozens of books each week, filtered often by agents who know who and where to place manuscripts for the best chance of a deal. A great many will reflect the zeitgeist of the moment.
So right now and over the last two or three years there has been a drive, quite correctly, to address the historic imbalance of representation both in gender and race and a great many novels, especially, have been published with this in mind.
The problems for a publisher are which ones to choose. They want both quality and commerciality. The process of purchasing books in itself is crazy. But if one novel sells especially well for one publisher then there is a domino effect among agents and publishers to find the next said novel.
Does quality decline? Probably, but as long as us the public keep buying them then publishers will keep publishing them.
Of course independent small publishers can be more creative to a point but they can probably less afford commercial flops than big publishers for whom the outlay may be greater but for whom the overall financial protection is wider.
All of this is sort of very well covered in Kuang's novel Yellowface, one of the things I admired about it.

I’ve read The Bee Sting - I’d be surprised if it were longlisted. It’s not bad, but it’s overlong, some sections drag massively, and it doesn’t quite..."
Thanks Owen. I'll give it a miss for a while.

. . .
Paul wrote: "There’s a good article in the Guardian on the Booker judging process (sorry can’t link!)
Mostly familiar ground but a few snippets
. . .
2020, Box Hill from Fitzcarraldo was apparently vetoed by two judges “as unsuitable for recommending to friends and family. (One judge wryly described their eventual winner, Shuggie Bain, as, by contrast, “gay, but not too gay”.)”. Which is troubling."
I'm still early going in The New Life, but the quote about Shuggie Bain keeps coming to mind. Crewe is definitely threading the needle, based on what he's choosing to include - and what he's choosing the exclude.
GY's review helpfully mentions the Afterword. Crewe is fairly explicit that he's setting out to write a novel that happens to have famous theorists as characters, rather than an examination of their thought and work. I wish he had put the Afterword before the text for those of us coming in with a working knowledge of the source material.
One big question is why Crewe decided to use famous theorists as main characters rather than supporting characters. It's too early for me to have conclusions on this, but it's been on my mind.

- The New Life
- The Hungry Ghosts
- Shy
- Losing the Plot
- The MANIAC
- The Fraud
- August Blue
- Demon Copperhead
- In Memoriam
- Biography of X
- In Ascension
- Chain-Gang All-Stars
- Close to Home
- Fire Rush
- Corey Fah Does Social Mobility
- Enter Ghost
- This Other Eden
- The Long Form
- Cuddy
- Victory City
- Small Worlds

1. Demon Copperhead
2. Victory City
3. This Other Eden
4. The New Life
5. August Blue
6. In Memoriam
7. Cuddy
8. Birnam Wood
9. Yellowface (taking a leap here)
10. Soldier Sailor
11. Fire Rush
12. Small Worlds

Fingers crossed for #13 :)"
THAT would be dynamite. If not, we'll get another go in a few years :)




I know we've talked about the prevalence of these books - the buzzy My Work comes out this fall too. It will be interesting to see how the Booker panel reflects this.



The UK cover also has an oddly similar concept to Eliza Clark’s new one, with the scribbled out face.



The UK cover also has an oddly similar concept t..."
I've read Kala. It's a decent book but not quite Booker material. It may indeed be too much of a genre book.




The UK cover also has an oddly simil..."
Thanks Jill - good to know! The marketing hasn't been very focused on it being a genre novel so I wasn't sure.

Actually, reading Kala made me think that Rebecca Makkai's I Have Some Questions For You is Booker material because it does something similar but manages to weave in such themes and be thought-provoking.
Btw, great video, Ben!

I would agree about Kala: lovely, lyrical writing and strong characterisation but it's essentially another genre novel about a missing girl in the past and small-town corruption.

Actually, reading Kala made me thin..."
Thank you Ruben, that's very kind of you!

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


The Other Eden is a stunningly written book. I gave it 5 stars, but it was a qualified 5 stars. I admired it more than loved it. For me, books succeed most when they capture both my mind and my heart (of course, there are always exceptions). The book I both love and admire most this year is Daniel Mason's North Wood. At the very least, I believe it will win the Pulitzer.

One of the group WROTE Hungry Ghost? I had no idea. Oh my! How wonderful!

But yes many of us have read it and think it’s a very strong contender - and I think it’s currently second in the Listopia votes (in the first thread of this chain)



This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Matrix (other topics)Elena Knows (other topics)
Falling Animals (other topics)
The Long Form (other topics)
Shy (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Brinda Charry (other topics)Rachel Heng (other topics)
Maithreyi Karnoor (other topics)
Hanna Stoltenberg (other topics)
Maithreyi Karnoor (other topics)
More...