2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion
This topic is about
Cut and Run
Cut and Run
>
Question C
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 01, 2022 08:50AM
Mod
reply
|
flag
The picture of their SUV heading into Mexico was compelling evidence that they had fled. But, if that was their only evidence they didn't do a very good job investigating.
I agree, Anita. A single picture of the car crossing into Mexico seemed to be the only evidence. Wouldn't there be more in the file? It should at least show other lines of inquiry that they made.
It all was lousy investigative work. If there was one picture, there would be more that would give them a better view of who was in that car. And, they had assets in Mexico that could have confirmed as much. And, no way would they flee to Mexico and never contact friends or family.
This was shoddy work, especially on the federal level. The local investigation was a joke and they should have seen it.
This was shoddy work, especially on the federal level. The local investigation was a joke and they should have seen it.
I agree. The photo wasn't very good and gave no solid proof that they entered Mexico. It was as if they just wanted to close the case and be done with it.


