Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Requests for Superlibrarians
>
merge needed
date
newest »
newest »
That edition seems valid, did you mean an other edition?
yes, I meant an empty one (only title in all lower caps, 6 adds)
sorry I already merged it and forgot to post. :-/
Two of the same book: The good version
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6...
The bad one
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6...
Two more that need merginghttps://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...
Erin wrote: "Two of the same book: The good version
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6...
The bad one
https://www.goodreads.com/book/s..."
Not bad, perfectly valid. I have combined them. They do not need a merge and do not require a superlibrarian.
Scott wrote: Not bad, perfectly valid. I have combined them. They do not need a merge and do not require a superlibrarian."*high five* Did give it the cover and corrected translators name and the Umlauts in the description. + combined it with the original edition.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
that one https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6... needs a merge (the author was incorrect)
Thanks a lot!