2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

Minutes to Kill (Scarlet Falls, #2)
This topic is about Minutes to Kill
7 views
Minutes to Kill (JDR) > Question H

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Jonetta (ejaygirl) | 9239 comments Mod
Was there any difference in the psychopathy of Mick and Sam? Who was the bigger threat?


Lynn (ftbooklover) Mick seemed a little more in control. Sam was more driven by rage. Sam was more likely to make mistakes. Mick was more careful by planning and being patient.


Charlene (charlenethestickler) | 1203 comments Their control of their hair trigger rage was different, but only by degrees, imho.


~Melissa~ | 429 comments Mick was able to delay and plan. Sam - as soon as he had a course of action in his head it was full steam ahead and there was no talking him out of it. Mick was scared of his own brother as well. Mick wouldn't get in Sam's way or try to talk him down.


Jonetta (ejaygirl) | 9239 comments Mod
They were both dangerous in their own rights. Mick as the planner was deadly but Sam’s impulsivity and depravity was equally scary. The combination of the two? Highly lethal.


Lisa - (Aussie Girl) Both had serious problems. Sam seemed more of your garden variety psychopath, he just liked hurting people. Mick seemed to have a chip on his shoulder as big as Texas and this seemed to drive his behaviour. Definitely lethal as a combination, as Jonetta noted.


back to top