The Mookse and the Gripes discussion
The Goldsmiths Prize
>
2021 Goldsmiths Prize General Discussion
message 101:
by
Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer
(new)
Oct 20, 2021 02:40PM

reply
|
flag

As someone who hasn't read a lot of fiction that is 'experimental' or using last night's buzzword, 'innovative', I found last night disappointing. (From the enthusiasm and love for the shortlist from this group, I had been looking forward to the event.)
It would have been helpful to have hard more introductory comments from the authors to introduce someone like me to their book.
The event was geared toward readers familiar with the work and with a greater innovative reading experience.
I thought Rebecca's reading of Little Scratch came over very well and I would have liked to have heard more from Natasha Brown about Assembly.
Sorry to be a bit negative

I have to say that the Booker Prize does it better and the Women's Prize does it so much better (but that's true of pretty well every aspect of that prize). The Women's Prize shortlist event this year was a brilliant event which really bought each book to life (and of course they also did the separate actor readings/author previews and two person interviews over three nights)
But even for the Goldsmiths, and even allowing for the fact we all have Zoom fatigue, that was a poor evening which did not reflect well on what is a very good prize and very interesting shortlist.
As you say a reading does not work if it is not bracketed by some some introductory remarks and then I think also needs some follow up questions to the author from the host to explain more of the book.
if there is one good thing from the evening I hope it attracts more people to get the audio book of Little Scratch (although as commented it is expensive)


NB I think innovative is used rather than experimental since on the words of the former winner “The word 'experimental' makes the whole enterprise sound so dubious and tentative, so doomed to failure.”

Publisher’s Weekly in the US has a top 10 with 2 Goldsmiths books - Assembly and A Shock - as well as Second Place
https://best-books.publishersweekly.c...

Except they have it in the top 10 books across all genres, fiction and non fiction, Anglophone and translated, in the US in 2021)

Good lord, I scare myself when I miss things like that!


Personal taste aside, A Shock and This One Sky Day do seem less “Goldsmiths” than the others, even to their authors (see Ridgway’s New Statesman interview or Ross’s comment at the readings) whereas the other 4 feel more consciously innovative in form.



I didn't dislike any of the books, but since Goldsmiths is about innovation I see it as a 4-2 split, with Ross and Ridgway the two that are harder to justify.


Natasha Brown has kindly invited Gumble's Yard and I to attend (on Zoom) the prize announcement tonight, which seems not to be publicly broadcast.



It was I have to say a really pleasant surprise to receive a message from the author of my favourite book of 2021

It was I have to say a really pleasant surprise to receive a message from ..."
Even if she did call you Grumble. (which is fitting)

Will be interesting if the Twitter feed beats the official announcement - iirc that happened once on the International Booker

I actually think Assembly (favourite) or Checkout 19




No surprises that there is a new entry at number 1


I understand exactly what you're saying GY. Given how strong the offerings were by non-white authors on this year's shortlist, it's quite disappointing.


At least they had some non white judges and authors this year
Books mentioned in this topic
Sterling Karat Gold (other topics)Assembly (other topics)
Checkout 19 (other topics)
little scratch (other topics)
The Hours Before Dawn (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Keith Ridgway (other topics)Claire-Louise Bennett (other topics)
Natasha Brown (other topics)
Leone Ross (other topics)
Isabel Waidner (other topics)
More...