Great Plains Book Club discussion

This topic is about
The Great Plains in Transition
Coffee Klatch Annex
>
The Great Plains in Transition
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Oliver
(new)
-
added it
Sep 24, 2021 09:39AM

reply
|
flag
I think when you get to the chapter on sutland and younland, Oliver, you will see the direct relationship to your thesis research.

Kraenzel seems to have a different mindset than Webb or even Cather. I'm not sure they would as open-handedly ask for help in the way Kraenzel does. I'm excited to get started on this book.
Kraenzel ia a planner; land-use planning had a vogue in the 1930s. He also is a rural sociologist; thus he extends planning to people.
Great review, Dan. You see the connection to Webb. Kraenzel does not dispute that environment rules, and humankind must adapt, but unlike Webb, Kraenzel still sees the adaptation as a work in progress. Notice the chronology: Webb publishing in 1931, pre-Dust bowl, Kranzel in 1955 (as I recall), post-Dust Bowl, and getting into the so-called Filthy Fifties. Kraenzel's work is another of those that hovers in-between primary and secondary. He has a lot of secondary matter in the front, but then he gets into current problems, and thus is a great source as to thought about the Great Plains a generation after Webb. As a planner, Kraenzel wants to see the people of the plains take their future into their hands. But that requires dismantling much of what they have built. A hard sell.