Reading the Detectives discussion

This topic is about
The Case of the Gilded Fly
Buddy reads
>
The Case of the Gilded Fly - SPOILER Thread (Oct/Nov 21)
date
newest »



I agree, about the academic setting, and about Fen’s unique attitude- I appreciated how serious he was about the murder, despite the rotten personality of the victim! I thought he was quirky and odd, but entertaining - and his relationship with his wife, Dolly, was unique and cleverly written. The scene where Gervase has her reenact the flawed suicide theory was funny - Dolly was totally unfazed, despite the gun being loaded. I hope we see more of her in future books!



Thanks for sharing! Reading this article, and the reference to Fen tearing around Oxford at all hours, using terms like “oh, my paws and whiskers”, made me realize Fen reminds me of another favorite academic amateur detective I adore, Charlotte Macleod’s Peter Shandy! He teaches at a small rural Massachusetts agricultural college, but is also a rather quirky but clever character, prone to littering his conversations with literary allusions (he’s a middle-aged confirmed bachelor in the series debut, but soon married a college librarian).

Yes, she just smiles and says she’s going home, tells Gervase not to wake the children when he gets home. She’s terrific!

Lady Clementina, RE: breaking the fourth wall. It makes me squirm sometimes but here I agree, it’s just part of the fun! Seems to have been quite a feature of tongue-in-cheek British mysteries of this era.

Lady Cle..."
Good news, I’ve found several of her books as ebooks on Scribd, and gotten good deals through Amazon on kindle books! My used paperbacks are so yellowed and have such tiny print, I don’t read them anymore, I use the ebooks!

In Gilded Fly, I loved the Alice references a lot, paws and whiskers, I'm late and him being asleep like the dormouse

Fen did reference Alice a lot. Possibly a little Oxford joke?
When I first read this, some readers found the fact everyone disliked the victim an issue, but I felt this is fairly common in GA crime novels.
When I first read this, some readers found the fact everyone disliked the victim an issue, but I felt this is fairly common in GA crime novels.

Yes, plus the difference between the British and more hard-boiled crime novels in the US, from the same period, which I have read was largely down to the First World War and reluctance to read anything too upsetting. It was an era of puzzles in the UK and crosswords became popular at about the same time, so crimes tended to have 'disposable' victims, rather than sympathetic one, and lots of clues to work out.

When I first read this, some readers found the fact everyone disliked the victim an issue, but I felt this is fairly common in GA crim..."
I was wondering the same thing as well; I can't remember the other books I've read in this series, but I just saw someone's review of a novella featuring Fen and Alice is very much there as well.

I’m the only literary critic turned detective in the whole of fiction.
Really, Gervase. If there’s anything I profoundly dislike, it is the sort of detective story in which one of the characters propounds views on how detective stories should be written…
Oh Lord….Mystification again. I know: it can’t come out till the last chapter.
Is it usual...for the detective to discuss the crime with his suspects in this impartial and informative fashion?
I've finished this now and enjoyed it. I think I was more disturbed by the general hatred of the victim first time around - and I still think it is quite disconcerting that Helen, for instance, isn't more bothered by Yseut's death even if they didn't get on.
There's also an element of misogyny with Yseut getting rather a lot of blame for other people's behaviour - Robert didn't have to have an affair with her and Donald didn't have to fall in love (or lust) with her!
But I agree the victim everyone hates was common in books of the era and I don't think dislike of Yseut is particularly dwelt on as the novel goes on. Fen also realises he is wrong to even consider going easy on the killer because of his opinion of the victim.
There's also an element of misogyny with Yseut getting rather a lot of blame for other people's behaviour - Robert didn't have to have an affair with her and Donald didn't have to fall in love (or lust) with her!
But I agree the victim everyone hates was common in books of the era and I don't think dislike of Yseut is particularly dwelt on as the novel goes on. Fen also realises he is wrong to even consider going easy on the killer because of his opinion of the victim.
I also really like Dolly - sadly I don't think she appears in any of the other Crispin books, although I have only read a few of them! I remember there are lots of Alice references in the other books too, though, so Fen must be a big fan.

'Oh my fur and whiskers' seems a particular favourite since someone mentioned it appearing in another book as well.

Oh, nuts - I was fascinated by Dolly and Gervase’s relationship, was looking forward to seeing more of it…


I’m the only literary critic turned detective in the whole of fiction.
Really, Gervase. If there’s anything I profoundly dislike, it is the sort of dete..."
Just reading this now after having posted the same ones in the non-spoiler thread-I enjoyed them in this context.

Can anyone explain the Gilded Fly reference to me? What did it have to do with the ring?
I still wasn't clear on what Warner was being blackmailed for-was it that he had used prostitutes in South America, or that he was involved in their procurement/making money from the trade? It was a rather fantastical murder-how could Warner have known that Yseut would be searching the appropriate drawer right at the time that the men were listening to such vigorous music, and that they would be sitting with all the windows open? Including the one in Donald's room?
A fun read nonetheless.


I thought that he was more involved in making money from the trade, and that was why he was being blackmailed.

Frances wrote: "I also quite enjoyed this one, and look forward to reading further Crispin mysteries with this group.
Can anyone explain the Gilded Fly reference to me? What did it have to do with the ring?
I s..."
I agree with the fantastical murder method. Shooting thru three open windows and hitting Yseut in the forehead, combined with finding her in the appropriate position at the opportune time stretches my imagination.
Can anyone explain the Gilded Fly reference to me? What did it have to do with the ring?
I s..."
I agree with the fantastical murder method. Shooting thru three open windows and hitting Yseut in the forehead, combined with finding her in the appropriate position at the opportune time stretches my imagination.
I just discovered Etsy this weekend, Abigail :) What a great ring.
I agree that the murder method rivalled Dorothy L. Sayers for bizarre chance, but really enjoyed this one.
I agree that the murder method rivalled Dorothy L. Sayers for bizarre chance, but really enjoyed this one.
Theater companies are notorious hotbeds of intrigue, and few are more intriguing than the company currently in residence at Oxford University. Center-stage is the beautiful, malicious Yseut - a mediocre actress with a stellar talent for destroying men. Rounding out the cast are more than a few of her past and present conquests, and the women who love them. And watching from the wings is Professor Gervase Fen - scholar, wit, and fop extraordinaire - who would infinitely rather solve crimes than expound on English literature. When Yseut is murdered, Fen finally gets his wish.
Though clear kin to Lord Peter Wimsey, Fen is a spectacular original - brilliant, eccentric and rude, much taken with himself and his splendid yellow raincoat, and given to quoting Lewis Carroll at inappropriate occasions. Gilded Fly, originally published in 1944, was both Fen's first outing and the debut of the pseudonymous Crispin (in reality, composer Bruce Montgomery), whom the New York Times once called the heir to "John Dickson Carr . . . and Groucho Marx."
Please feel free to post spoilers in this thread.