The Mookse and the Gripes discussion

289 views
Booker Prize for Fiction > 2021 Booker Prize Shortlist Discussion

Comments Showing 101-150 of 264 (264 new)    post a comment »

message 101: by Mohamed (new)

Mohamed Ikhlef | 818 comments What a wonderful news! Congratulations !


message 102: by Tom (new)

Tom | 200 comments Thanks everyone!!


message 103: by Emmeline (new)

Emmeline | 1042 comments Congratulations! I recommend The Owl and the Pussycat for the next bookcase update!


message 104: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW That’s wonderful new! I’m so happy for you and your wife. Little Theo is adorable. It’s a whole new world when a baby is born.

Our kids were big fans of Sandra Boynton.

My 25 yr old son just bought a house, my mother has given him the engagement/wedding rings my dad gave her, and he’s been dating the perfect girl for him for four years now. He needs to get things moving here, I want a baby in my life again!!!


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Evaristo’s take on the joint run from her autobiography (quoted in the Guardian review - I have not read the book)

“Two women, two races, two nations, two generations – two members of the human race.”


message 106: by LindaJ^ (new)

LindaJ^ (lindajs) | 1118 comments Tom, thanks for including us in your joyous news!


message 107: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW Evaristo is gracious, but that should not have been required of her.


message 108: by Karen Michele (new)

Karen Michele Burns (klibrary) | 209 comments What exciting news, Tom! I haven't been writing much lately, but I'm reading along and I'm making progress on the shortlist.


message 109: by Hossein (new)

Hossein | 11 comments I know it’s not a place for asking this question, then forgive me. I just read “ when we cease to understand the world “, I couldn’t understand the schwarzchild singularity.
Can you explain it in a more simple way?


message 110: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments We've a dedicated thread for the book - https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/... - so better over there. I'll reply over there


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Apologies if already posted but I found this an interesting interview with the chair of judges discussing each book in quite some detail.

https://fivebooks.com/best-books/the-...


message 112: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments The authors on the inspiration for their books

https://www.theguardian.com/books/202...


message 113: by David (new)

David | 3885 comments Is there a consensus favorite among the betting markets?


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Is anyone on the forum in easyish travel distance of London and would like a free ticket for the in person event this evening (or knows anyone else who might). I have three going which I can email to anyone who wants one or more of them.


message 115: by Chris (new)

Chris (csriha17) | 15 comments I’ve only found two actual betting markets (and clearly I’m not a gambler because I’m not even sure how to read the page properly, plus the second one might just be reflecting the first) but what I saw was The Promise out front, followed by Bewilderment.

Here’s the one I’m confident is an actual pool:

https://smarkets.com/event/42307961/t...


message 116: by David (new)

David | 3885 comments That’s about what I would have guessed. The Promise a slight favorite over Bewilderment, but the rest of the field collectively still at about 50/50.


message 117: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments I am going to be live streaming tonight’s event. Anyone else joining? GY, you and your daughters can’t make it?


message 118: by Henk (new)

Henk | 229 comments I'll join the livestream as well, looking forward to seeing the authors together


message 119: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW If my private jet wasn’t in for repairs I’d take a ticket, GY.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments You would need a time machine now Wendy so unless you are the new Doctor I think it won’t work.


message 121: by Henk (new)

Henk | 229 comments Patricia Lockwood wanting to die as a martyr for understanding the internet (or eat it) is currently the most special moment if you'd ask me


message 122: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments Anyone else notice that five of the six authors read from a physical copy of the book and one (Lockwood) read from her phone? Made me chuckle, I must say.


message 123: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Did she write it on her phone? A recent (and a lot lot better) book I read, by Lauren Elkin, was written with the Notes function on her iPhone each day, and published largely as written with minimal editing.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Yes she did not do that at the Womens Prize (She read from a book).

I actually thought Nadifa Mohamed has spoken the most impressively tonight so far.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments And that Lockwood gave the best reading.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments She wrote a lot of the book on her phone yes but due to circumstances of being around her niece rather than on transport.


message 127: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Has to be said the Elkin book read like it hadn’t really been edited ie random notes.


message 128: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments I do fear the tragedy of her niece may make this a 2014 repeat.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments My daughter’s question was the first one. Led to an interesting discussion I felt - was particularly brave of Anuk to say he queries the importance of fiction. And Powers answer was brilliant.


message 130: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments I really liked Powers’ reading and his comments. I was very surprised by the passage Shipstead chose to read, given that I think the historical part of her novel is so much stronger than the modern part.


message 131: by Henk (new)

Henk | 229 comments Cindy wrote: "I really liked Powers’ reading and his comments. I was very surprised by the passage Shipstead chose to read, given that I think the historical part of her novel is so much stronger than the modern..."

Yes that had me baffled, the "high" scene that's almost universally lambasted in reviews. Let's say it's daring...


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Self sabotage it felt like.


message 133: by Paul (last edited Oct 31, 2021 02:12PM) (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Henk wrote: "Cindy wrote: "I really liked Powers’ reading and his comments. I was very surprised by the passage Shipstead chose to read, given that I think the historical part of her novel is so much stronger..."

Yes that had me baffled, the "high" scene that's almost universally lambasted in reviews. Let's say it's daring.."


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Self sabotage it felt like."

I would generally leap to her defence in that the modern parts are what elevates the novel above mere historical fiction (a la Mantel say) and makes this stronger than several other on the short- and long-list

But other than introducing me to a new word ('shroom') even I can't defend that passage.

But she may be relying on Paul's booker rule number 3 (or whichever one it is) -i.e. given the judges long- then short-listed the book then they must be those responsible for the 'almost' in the 'almost universally lambasted' - and it's ultimately their opinion that matters, not anyone else's in terms of who wins, and indeed who sells most copies.


message 134: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments GY, please tell your Molly that I thought her question was superb.

I enjoyed this event a great deal. I was really struck by Galgut’s comments about the absence of black voices in The Promise and his extremely careful choice of words throughout.


message 135: by Emmeline (new)

Emmeline | 1042 comments Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "My daughter’s question was the first one. Led to an interesting discussion I felt - was particularly brave of Anuk to say he queries the importance of fiction. And Powers answer was brilliant."

Another one who queries the importance of fiction? I'm starting to feel it would be more revolutionary for someone to defend fiction...


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Powers defended it very firmly.

And thanks Cindy.


message 137: by Paul (last edited Oct 31, 2021 02:20PM) (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments What was Mollie's question?

I guess on questioning fiction, if this came from the Ishiguro remarks we've debated before, I thought he made (even if the interviewer missed) a very interesting point about fiction in an era of #fakenews and scepticism of science.


message 138: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Incidentally is the recording available? Rather inconsiderate of the event to pick Halloween night.

I've also completely lost track - when do we find out the winner? Presumably soon.


message 139: by Henk (new)

Henk | 229 comments Wednesday the winner will be selected


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments Recording like live event is available to buy for 7.50 from Southbank.

There is a programme in bbc on Wednesday like last year with filmed dramatisations, last years winner and then the announcement.


message 141: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Hoping the Guildhall Dinner is soon back - or wonder if that's lost permanently.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments I suspect it may be lost - BBC I know seem to really like the new event


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments “In a world threatened by climate change, inequality, racism and COVID do we really need more factual writing. Or would the authors argue that engaged fiction is more important than ever. “


message 144: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13433 comments Great question

And yes to be fair going to the dinner (a one off) was great but it didn’t make for good TV. It was filmed as if TV was eavesdropping on a private dinner, which they basically were. I remember the year the presenters were talking in the balcony and missed that the prize had been announced.


message 145: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "“In a world threatened by climate change, inequality, racism and COVID do we really need more factual writing. Or would the authors argue that engaged fiction is more important than ever. “"


Your daughter asked this question? How old is Molly?


message 146: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments The moderator said she was 15. Blew my mind.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments All the Front Row Booker Book Groups in one place and without needing to scroll through each days programme to find the Booker slot

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0b1...


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10129 comments So what is everyone’s prediction with almost exactly 24 hours to go.

To kick things off ….

It seems like The Promise (Four Funerals And A Partheid) is the generally most common choice both with bookmakers and various articles/bloggers. I have kind of resigned myself to it happening.

But this week of all weeks the judges can’t help I feel being swayed towards Bewilderment - it would certainly get the most publicity and coverage for the prize and bookshops. And many of the obvious criticisms of it - it’s slight naivety and polemical nature, the character of Robin and his very black and white views on humanity and politicians - are rather harder to make with the real life Inger Alder all over the news.

The dark horse might be Fortune Men

Lockwood feels like it’s unlikely to be enough of a consensus choice and like the Womens Prize I think will end up shortlisted not winner

Passage North would seem an odd choice given everything the judges said about readability.

And I do not know what to say on the Great Circle as I cannot fathom it’s longlisting.


message 149: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments I think it has to be between The Promise and Bewilderment. I take your point on how topical Bewilderment is, this week more than ever before in the UK, but there has been a lot of negativity around the book, much to my surprise, including even suggestions that the father's choices amount to neglect, if not outright abuse, of Robin (which stunned me). Last year I felt as though there was a fair amount of consensus around Shuggie Bain in broader literary circles, and I see no consensus at all this year.

I confess that I would love it if Lockwood won, but I agree completely that it's extremely unlikely. As I sit here, it's hard to imagine any of the four other books winning.


message 150: by Chris (new)

Chris Blocker (chrisblocker) | 82 comments Most years I feel there is one title that stands out as a deserving winner. This year that isn't the case.

I feel fairly confident that The Promise, Bewilderment, and The Fortune Men are the only contenders. I will be very shocked if one of the other books wins.

Personally, I hope that The Promise wins, but I'm going to put my play money on The Fortune Men.


back to top