Retro Reads discussion

The Sunne in Splendour
This topic is about The Sunne in Splendour
14 views
Group Reads > April 7, 2021- May 21, 2021 The Sunne in Splendour Group Read- Part 3

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , She's a mod, yeah, yeah, yeah! (new) - rated it 3 stars

Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂  | 2713 comments Mod
Part three.


Barb in Maryland | 674 comments Just started this part and look! George is is still being a royal pain.


Barb in Maryland | 674 comments Hmm, Penman's rationale for Ned's decision re: George is very interesting...


Kavan | 85 comments Elizabeth Woodville is really wretched. She is just awful. Penman doesn't even make her sympathetic when she ought to be. EW just rushes to the darkness.


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 2071 comments Barb in Maryland wrote: "Just started this part and look! George is is still being a royal pain."

Ha! “Royal pain” - saw what you did there!


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 2071 comments Kavan wrote: "Elizabeth Woodville is really wretched. She is just awful. Penman doesn't even make her sympathetic when she ought to be. EW just rushes to the darkness."

She certainly does- self-serving doesn’t begin to cover it - talk about a beautiful wrapper around a nasty, vicious core...


Abigail Bok (regency_reader) But is Ned much better? After all, (view spoiler)


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 2071 comments Abigail wrote: "But is Ned much better? After all, [spoilers removed]"

Very true - Ned had great strengths, but great weaknesses, with far-reaching consequences. Near as I can tell, Elizabeth was just beautiful and conniving, (view spoiler)


Kavan | 85 comments Ned struck me as a more complex character. His actions were not excusable but he did seem to struggle with them. He had great strengths but equally weaknesses... I also feel like his arc was really about how absolute power corrupts absolutely. And I think there were a good many hints he was tortured by his decisions.

Whereas Elizabeth just seemed to be really petty. She was totally self serving in wanting to elevate her family and not much else. But again I think Ned's decision probably made her a lot more ruthless...whereas earlier she was just kind of petty and rude after his reveal she was like full on evil.


Abigail Bok (regency_reader) The men are all more complex characters in this book than the women, aren’t they? I find this book very dated and a tad offensive in its use of maiden-mother-nun-whore tropes. It feels very 1950s/1960s in its sensibilities. Even when writing about a society as male dominated as the one being depicted, it is possible to write women as people rather than types.

As for Ned, his greater self-awareness makes him more morally responsible in my book.


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 2071 comments Kavan wrote: "Ned struck me as a more complex character. His actions were not excusable but he did seem to struggle with them. He had great strengths but equally weaknesses... I also feel like his arc was really..."

Definitely agree, thank you for your succinct summary of Ned and Elizabeth’s differences. He knew and cared about what he did, but was too weak to stop; she was just vindictive and petty - a beautiful shell, but no “there, there.” Wanting to stare at his crown while in bed together- eek! Gold digger, much? I’m really surprised Ned wanted her that much, for that long, honestly...


Susan in NC (susanncreader) | 2071 comments Abigail wrote: "The men are all more complex characters in this book than the women, aren’t they? I find this book very dated and a tad offensive in its use of maiden-mother-nun-whore tropes. It feels very 1950s/1..."

That’s a good point - two, actually, about the dated Madonna/whore complex with all the female characters, and about Ned being morally responsible. I was wrestling in my mind, like some hellish game show, “Who’s the worst parent?” Elizabeth is petty and proud, but the Woodvilles sound like a rather nasty family, which may account for her being that way...Ned knows better (as my grandmother would have said, “was raised to know better.”)


message 13: by Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , She's a mod, yeah, yeah, yeah! (new) - rated it 3 stars

Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂  | 2713 comments Mod
I'm glad to get to Part 3. Part two did drag in parts for me I found Richard & Anne's story a bit cloying.

& George just gets more awful.


message 14: by Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , She's a mod, yeah, yeah, yeah! (new) - rated it 3 stars

Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂  | 2713 comments Mod
After finding the first part so enthralling, I must say the end of Part 2 & beginning of Part 3 are dragging a bit.


Kavan | 85 comments For me the book lagged a bit once Ned, Elizabeth and George had less to do. I think Pennman loved Richard but I don't think the way she scripts him is particularly compelling. I find myself convinced he was a lot more complex that she portrayed him.


message 16: by Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂ , She's a mod, yeah, yeah, yeah! (new) - rated it 3 stars

Carol She's So Novel꧁꧂  | 2713 comments Mod
George may well be more complex than Penman portrays him as well. From this distance it would be hard to think of reasons for many of George's actions though.


back to top