Debating bout Books discussion

8 views
Random Debates > Random Debate {} Paperbacks or Hardcovers?

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Anushka, Vice President (new)

Anushka (bookish_swiftie) | 51 comments Which kind of books do you prefer? Paperbacks or hardcovers?


message 2: by Anushka, Vice President (new)

Anushka (bookish_swiftie) | 51 comments Both have their own pros and cons. With paperbacks, it's easier to carry, the price is less, and the weight is less, but the covers are not so pretty.

With hardcovers, you get pretty covers but the books are expensive, difficult to carry, and heavy.


message 3: by iffat (new)

iffat (iffattheavidreader) Paperbacks are functional, whereas hardcovers are pretty. I really love hardcovers as they are aesthetic and smart! But they are VERY.EXPENSIVE. And for reading, I prefer paperbacks as they are easy to read and carry anywhere


message 4: by Anushka, Vice President (new)

Anushka (bookish_swiftie) | 51 comments Iffat Nusaiba wrote: "Paperbacks are functional, whereas hardcovers are pretty. I really love hardcovers as they are aesthetic and smart! But they are VERY.EXPENSIVE. And for reading, I prefer paperbacks as they are eas..."

Agreed! Paperbacks are good for reading, but go for hardcovers if you want a pretty collection.


back to top