Literally Dead Book Club discussion
HOUSE OF LEAVES
>
the first 20 pages

especially the introduction got me wondering:
why is the word HOUSE always written in blue?
why are some words underlined?
why does Johnny use some phrases, that don't aligne with his normal way of writing ( At least in my opinion^^)
The Record part is a bit boring to me honestly and those anecdotes, added by Johnny, are strange.
I hope, I can finish this book this month. I only read small parts of it at a time, because always searching for clues is a bit tiring XD




The appendix mentions in the footnotes are good for giving more context and depth to characters. I think I'm actually going to look through the pages I've read so far to make sure I haven't missed any. I really want to follow the "instructions" the book gives us in the footnotes by checking out things like the appendix.

So read the first 20 pages and tell me how you feel.
What have we gotten into?
How do you..."
I've gotten to page 80 and read appendixes D &E (Full Colour edition), and I tried to explain it to my husband with the plot inside a different plot and he just kind of spaced out on me. I don't know if there is a easy way to describe this thing. It sure is interesting though!

My advice is to view this as a “found object” instead of a “book.” So you were out talking a walk, you sit on a bench for a moment and you see a jumble of pages lying there and you decide to take them home and read them.
They are not too deliberate, they are a bit of a mess, not everything has a meaning that the reader can deduce. Some of it was typed up in delirium.
Also when looking at misogynistic things that a character says and does, remember he is a
Person, not our hero, so he is flawed and possibly a reflection of a guy in the 90’s with typical attitudes of the time.


So yeah, the whole point of this book is to be more challenging/engaging to navigate than just "a book." I really like Aabha's suggestion to treat it like a found object. I also wouldn't say this is strictly a horror novel. It's primarily an ergodic novel that involves some creepy elements (very creepy at times!).
Also, from my memory of reading this 8-ish years ago, I would advise that you don't worry about scrutinizing every footnote or strange typographical anomaly. You can enjoy this if you just glance over some stuff.
On the other hand - have fun going down a rabbit hole with anything that catches your fancy! Like, I told myself I wasn't going to get too entangled in the ergodic elements this time . . . then I wound up reading the index for a good 20 minutes and doing research about it online!

It's also reminding me of a very niche part of the Internet that not a lot of people may know about, but if anyone is familiar with The Slenderman, they may know about the YouTube series called Marcel Hornets?? Very obscure and again, very niche, but it has the same elements: the creepy vibe, the weird cryptid energy, mystery within a mystery, meta exploration
Love, love, love!!!!!



So, it’s been 15-20 years that I’ve been meaning to pick up this book and gotta say after 20 pages I have no idea what I just read. But I’m filled with dread and fear and that’s excellent.
I’m also confused. I also don’t know what’s real. Man this book is great already. I’ll check back in soon!


Right, I felt the same!? And why is house in blue? I am curious about that too.

I agree with most opinions already stated: I am a bit bored at times; however, I also get an exciting sense of horror at times. The book overall does have a creepy vibe that I am appreciating.
To everyone that gave tips on how to read this book: thank you, I thought they were helpful.
At the moment, I like the creativity of how this book is put together and I think it's an interesting read.





It is one of three primary colors
It is the hardest color for our eyes to see
Now let’s go over what we know of the house so far:
As of page 20, not a whole lot. However we do know that the “author” of the main part of the book is blind- is this why they colored the word house with the hardest color to see?


I also really like Johnny's footnotes. His initial tangents that establish his character "before" - a pretty typical 20-somthing, holds a job, goes out with friends, maybe a bit of a stereotypical late 90s grungy bohemian a la Roger from Rent (I'm picturing Adam Pascal lol) but all around a regular guy - and I find these lucid, mundane stories a stark contrast to the introduction. It's all setting up the "fall" really well.
The one uncertainty I have right now is actually with Zampano. His footnotes mention various interviews and scholarly articles which obviously don't exist in our real world (as opposed to things like the novel days between stations which someone above mentioned) but my question is, do those references exist in Zampano/Johnny's world? The impression I'm getting is that Johnny started researching and tracking down these references and discovered that they all don't exist? Not 100% sure but that's what I think is going on.
All in all though I like the set up! I'm a big found footage style horror movie fan, so the original navidson film reads like that, with Johnny's presentation adding layer of urban legend that adds a sense of realness/validity to the whole experience.

Totally agree. He has a perspective that lends something to the story, but that doesn't mean he's the hero of the story. Also worth remembering that he talks about how he was a consummate bullshit artist and recreational liar - what impact does that have on how we take his notes and how he (allegedly) packaged Zampano's writing?






I'm super interested in the plot and where things are going but I don't know if my brain can handle it right now. I'm going to give it 10-15 more pages but I might have to put the book on pause for now and revisit it at a later date.











Right, I felt the same!? And..."
Oh wow. This is an interesting tidbit...

Haha damn...I should get someone to read it to me too


I enjoyed the intro as to how Johnny got a hold on Zampanò's work, it laid that foundation of obscurity and mystery to what lay ahead.
These first 2 sections of The Navidson Record are rough for me. I have only been able to get through section 1 and 2 over these last 2 days. They seem very dense, and like someone above mentioned, makes me tired from possibly over analyzing everything. I also am stopping constantly to highlight the foot notes (which make no sense to me, they are just a bibliography of works I am not familiar with, and I don't know what to make of them) and stopping to write some interesting words down on paper. I am a tad frustrated but I do want to try my best to power through.
I do not think I will be able to finish this before the end of April, especially since I read Every Vow You Break before this.

I have just finished reading III ending on page 24 of my copy.
I am probably over analyzing. Why is HOUSE always blue? What's up with the old house? Is it haunted? I must continue reading in hopes of answers.
I will give the opening this, the hook worked on me. I have many questions and desire answers to said questions.
So read the first 20 pages and tell me how you feel.
What have we gotten into?
How do you feel?
Are you fuming at my book club choice?
Do we need to bump the live show to 2023? lol