TWILIGHT HATERS discussion
Twilight: Characters of Shame
>
A single good character in the books?
message 1:
by
Jim
(new)
Sep 30, 2009 06:16PM
I was wondering if there was even a single good character in the book and only came up with 2. Aro and Charlie. I just like Aro's personality for some reason, and i feel sorry for Charlie because he has a whiny bitchy Mary Sue for a daughter. Give me your thoughts on a single good character.
reply
|
flag
OF COURSE JANE!! she's awesome!! Except very 2D. But her evilness really is darn cool! I like her powers.
oh. And Benjamin. But he was really a pussy and extremely 2D. All the characters in Twilight were.
...Jane...
JACOB! (minus the whole "pedo" fiasco)..
Alice?
there is potential in a lot of them but SM makes them an epic fail, though I think the character with the most potential is Jane, who is not that bad but could be made even awesomer with a good author
jane and alice are cooland jane is as close to a real vamp as that book gets!
Who said I didn't? Was it um.. that one girl from The Hills, trying to destroy my life for the millionth time? I KNEW IT! SPEIDI!!!
Just needed something too make fun of, and teenage idiocy/shallowness seems like a fairly good place to start.
lol, nice...seth wouldve have been cool... if he was an insane, demented, 41 year old demon barber on fleet street, but hes no, so...
...good point.... hehe... I still love Johnny... but Tim is... amazing...
dude I dun really think that any of us can get all of our thoughts of twilight down
Jim wrote: "I was wondering if there was even a single good character in the book and only came up with 2. Aro and Charlie. I just like Aro's personality for some reason, and i feel sorry for Charlie because h..."i agree
it would be charlie
eh, i wouldve liked seth, but he just gets along with everyone, and thats annoying...and he still hasnt magically transformed into the demon barberon fleet street...
yeah... but he was also just to 'pure' for my taste...
i dont hate, i dispise/ dislike
again?!whoa whoa this is too much
yup!your such a great crowd dont forget your t-shirt on your way out
okay.i have so many nick names its not even funny
OMG i have donkathon, blondie, weirdo, the Brain, anna banana, cheater etc.
I would like Alice, but despite her bubbly happiness and abilities, she is really just another anti-feminist character who relies on Jasper and is tied to material things.
i dont like jacob... main reaso: a person who is not my friend anymore said that johnny depp was ugly, and that taylor was good good looking actor in the same conversation (NOTE: that person isnt my friend anymore, for a totaly different reason)
Nellie-la☠In the Flesh?☠ wrote: "lol, nice...seth wouldve have been cool... if he was an insane, demented, 41 year old demon barber on fleet street, but hes no, so..."
oh... haha
Jacob has potential.All the other minor characters are . Painfully 2-dimensional. Now, in the hands of some authors, 2-D can be a good thing. The first example I can think of this is Charles Dickens. All his supporting characters are pretty flat. But SM just uses typical cliches to describe her characters: sinister smiles, the bumbling joker, the beautiful blond b***h. The stereotypes are endless, and she uses them over and over again. Rosalie and Jessica are exactly alike, did you notice?
Jane is good. ummmm... Can't think of any others...
Deliabookworm wrote: "Jacob has potential.All the other minor characters are . Painfully 2-dimensional. Now, in the hands of some authors, 2-D can be a good thing. The first example I can think of this is Charles Dicke..."
REALLY?? I didn't realise!
Jane is so cool. I like Benjamin's powers of controlling the elements. Marcus intrigues me with his boredom in all the affairs. But the characters are so FLAT!!
Alice is okay, I guess...I kinda feel sorry for Bella's parents, cause they seem like nice people!'O.O
