2-3-4 Challenge Book Discussions #2 discussion

This topic is about
Silent Scream
Silent Scream
>
Question P
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jonetta
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Oct 13, 2020 12:35PM

reply
|
flag

Bryant's thoughts show what sort of person he is, the antithesis of Victor really. He sees the good in a situation, even with a killer. Not sure I agree with him though.

Kim's description is more accurate. He does prey on the lost souls.
I could be off base here but Bryant was swayed by him being a supposed man of the cloth. He was trying to find some balance in the man, like he could offset his horrible behavior with good works.
Victor was a predator and a vicious one at that. He used religion as a cover and absolution for himself. I never can remember the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath but Victor had to be one of them. He had no redeeming qualities, especially as he had zero remorse.
Kim called it right because she’d seen him before.
Victor was a predator and a vicious one at that. He used religion as a cover and absolution for himself. I never can remember the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath but Victor had to be one of them. He had no redeeming qualities, especially as he had zero remorse.
Kim called it right because she’d seen him before.

Kim's description is more accurate. He does pre..."
I agree, Sharon. Kim sees Bryant as being naive because he wanted to believe that the reason Victor chose where and how to work was because he was trying to do something good. He hasn't seen the side of life that Kim has. That's odd considering how long he has been a detective. I may be viewing Bryant as older than he is supposed to be in these stories.

Another thought is it’s Bryant’s nature to find the best in people. Here he was searching for it in Wilks.

That's what I thought.

Kim is the one I find incredibly interesting. I think she is right on in this instance. It’s like one broken person recognizing another broken person.