Reading the Detectives discussion
Archived threads
>
What mysteries are you reading at the moment? (2021)

LOL. It can be had as a paper back for a bit less.

I must have been looking at a foreign site. I neglected to re-type the title. I see it is about $18.


I am hoping that the standard I found continues.

I am hoping that the standar..."
I enjoyed the upcoming Christmas read, The Dead Shall be Raised, that’s why I nominated; looking forward to reading The Murder of a Quack, to see if I like it as much as my two previous Bellairs!






Oh, I know my mom enjoyed them but I haven't read them yet. Have you seen the William Powell adaptations?

I found decent copies on Amazon for about $8 with shipping. The cheaper ones that are marked acceptable or good I never buy as I find they are often flea bitten...lol.



Ah, I look forward to hearing what you think! I’ve ordered a copy from England- I figured it would take too long to wait for it from my city library - it took months on hold to get the first book!

Good to hear.

Yay! I’ve only heard good things about it, so glad to know he didn’t hit a “sophomore slump”!


I can see why this romantic thriller was a huge hit in it's day. And it has to be read in the context of the times (early 1880s).
It's an unusual book in many ways which is part of why I am find it enjoyable.

OMG Philo Vance. My grandmother used to love them and so did I.

I tried the first one in the series, and just could not connect with the affected way he spoke. Does it get better in later novels?




I always felt he spoke in a similar way to Sherlock Holmes. A very formal way of speaking. I haven't read them since early teens but back then I had no issues with it. I'll have to reread the Benson book soon and see if my perceptions have changed...


The first half dozen or so books are the best, the later ones less so.

Yes, he does have a kind of superior air about him. But I thought this quote summed it up best:
“Vance was debonair, whimsical, and superficially cynical—an amateur of the arts, and with only an impersonal concern in serious social and moral problems.”—The Scarab Murder Case, 1930, by S.S. Van Dine
And there's this from a review online:
Educated in Europe, he still carries the mannered speech of an upper-class Englishman, habitually referring to his colleagues as “old thing” or “old dear,” and punctuating nearly every other sentence with “don’t y’know.” The monocle-wearing Vance is remarkably indolent and frequently yawns his way through conversations. In truth, about the only thing that saves him from total insufferability is a droll sense of humor.
This air of condescension is not surprising since Vance appears to be an authority on every subject on the face of the earth, knowledge that he shares with his associates at every opportunity. In solving crimes, however, he puts more stock in understanding a suspect’s personal psychology than he does in picking up tangible clues. “When material facts and psychological facts conflict, the material facts are wrong,” he blithely tells Markham.

I don't think his way of speaking much changes going forward.

Generally, I like those first half dozen books and anyone who enjoys early Ellery Queen (the nationality titles) will see the parallels and ought to have a good time with them too.

I haven't read any yet, so can't comment on that; but people perhaps see it as as 'showing off' rather than simply sharing knowledge.


https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...


I really liked Ride the Pink Horse when with read that with Susan and Judy's other group

I can't say I found Wimsey or Alleyn insufferable. PM was at times annoying but after two books I got used to him. Never found RA annoying at all. As to HP, there were times when his mannerisms and ways were annoying. But again, I got used to it and grew to like him a lot.
Fascinating how people who dislike characters often rate a book on the low side. Hmmm. I can say I think that's very fair. If a writer can MAKE us like or dislike characters, I would always concede that writer did their job well. I have yet to see any comments from those who rate the book 2 stars or less about plot, craft, etc.
The man was "a stylish, even foppish dandy, a New York bon vivant possessing a highly intellectual bent." To that effect, he is well-sketched by Van Dine.
The author was well-known for his "scathing book reviews and irreverent opinions." And this comes out in his fiction writing as well.
That said, no writer is for everyone. However, despite the fact that he is annoying, I liked the books a lot.

As a fan of the author I'd say that Death From a Top Hat is probably Rawson's best novel. The next, The Footprints on the Ceiling, is fine too but his last two Merlini mysteries are not as good and No Coffin for the Corpse is actually downright poor in my opinion.
His short stories featuring Merlini are pretty good.

It took me several months to finish Benson, primarily due to how annoying I found Vance to be (I do not mind EQ so much in the early titles that are stylized in the same fashion). I will say however that I keep thinking back to the book, perhaps as a result of the descriptions of New York at that time, which came alive for me. I have an omnibus version with several other titles, so I will have to give another one a try.

Even if the particular book is not my jam, I have to say that all of the books I've read in the AMC collection have been excellent books, and you can see why they were hand picked to be reprinted. Its been a lot of fun exploring authors I might never have otherwise discovered.


The introduction describes the book as claustrophobic, and that feels like exactly the right word for it.


I have just finished - and I loved it too!
I have to admit that for me Douglas sounded very much like Douglas Richardson, as voiced by Roger Allam in


Should I just start with A Man Lay Dead? I didn't realize this author is a woman until I looked her up.

That's her first novel so it's good to start with it. The character does progress over time.

Very exciting finish.

I would say no, a thousand times no in fact! It was her first book and while first books are often weak, this is just plain lousy - it downright sucks if I'm being honest. If it were the first Marsh book I'd read, I doubt I'd ever have read another. Jump in with Artists in Crime or one of the theatrical mysteries instead, you won't be missing a thing if you never read A Man Lay Dead.

I would say no, a thousand times no in fact! It was her first book and while first books are often weak, this is just plain lousy - it down..."
I would say NO, a MILLION times NO. It does NOT suck at all.
The subplot is not especially interesting and got a bit tedious, but otherwise it's a solid novel - and considering the handful of low ratings on here, it still has a near 4/5 ranking. Mostly, it’s a great first book.
She does not write in the same style as Christie so don't go in expecting that. Go it as I do for any book with ZERO expectations as to what it "should" be like. We should always try our best not to make too many comparisons.
Also, your liking of it will depend on how much you like GA mysteries and the writing style back then. I love them. From his average ratings, Colin is not too keen on them.
Go to Amazon and make use of the LOOK INSIDE function for this and a few of her other books. If what you read appeals to you, then it's a safe bet most of her works will.
I never not try a writer based on anyone's outlook. It's all far too subjective.

If someone wants to go ahead and read it, then they should do so. However, when someone asks if it would be a good introduction to the writer, then I feel I should point out that it is among her very worst books and there's a good chance the reader would never pick up another. Try the writer by all means, but with someone whose output is as large and massively variable as Marsh's then I'd try to steer a new reader towards something that might actually be enjoyable for them.
Personally, I always like to start a series with the first novel. With Marsh, I do think she is quite inconsistent and variable. I liked the early books more though.
I enjoyed the first book in the series as far as I remember, although some elements were far-fetched - but I read them all out of order as a teenager and don't remember what one I started with.
Hopefully this is unnecessary, but may I just remind everyone that obviously opinions do vary and we need to be respectful of one another's views. Thank you.
Hopefully this is unnecessary, but may I just remind everyone that obviously opinions do vary and we need to be respectful of one another's views. Thank you.


I found it rather underwhelming, not bad but not especially engaging either - review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I also have the next book but I can't say I'm in a hurry to get to it. Has anyone read it, and is it an improvement?
Books mentioned in this topic
The Saint Valentine's Day Murders (other topics)The Saint Valentine's Day Murders (other topics)
House of Cards (other topics)
The 39 Steps (other topics)
The 39 Steps (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Michael Dobbs (other topics)John Buchan (other topics)
Catherine Aird (other topics)
Colin Watson (other topics)
Colin Watson (other topics)
More...
A LOL. A paperback will only set you back about $8.