The Mookse and the Gripes discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
472 views
Booker Prize for Fiction > 2021 Booker Prize Speculation

Comments Showing 501-550 of 1,196 (1196 new)    post a comment »

message 501: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW This novel sounds to much of the moment for me.
I assume it’s known in the UK that Ghislaine Maxwell was the partner of Jeff Epstein and procured under age girls for Epstein’s parties. If so that is an awful choice for a character in a novel about current events.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments Oddly it’s very much not of the moment as it’s fixated on the September 18- September 19 period so misses the 2019 election, the subsequent Brexit vote (both of which are crucial to the narrator’s concerns and completely change the picture) and of course COVID. It actually reads very dated


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments Yes so had I and particularly from the blurbs. I just could not quite get a handle on it.


message 504: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments I have finished my ARC of Cloud Cuckoo Land by Anthony Doerr (and have mailed it off to Tom, who asked first for it). It's quite an epic experience to read, and I am still processing it. In many ways, it's a much more complicated work than All the Light We Cannot See, but a part of me feels that he was trying to do too much in one book (even though thematically it very much hangs together). I will have more to say about it after I've let it sit for a bit. I would not be surprised to see it on the longlist.


message 505: by Jo (new)

Jo Rawlins (englishteacherjo) | 296 comments That's interesting to hear, Cindy. One I am super keen to read. Going to have to wait for it to be published though.

Just reading Mrs England by Stacey Halls at the moment. It is such a joy to read. Her first two books were very good but this is better.

Back to Booker discussion... Still waiting on an announcement as to when the Longlist will be announced.

I have now finished The Other Black Girl and Assembly. Similar themes but entirely different execution. Assembly, for me, is something a bit special. Originality deluxe. Stark. Insightful. Subtle work of genius.

On to Little Scratch soon...


message 506: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW I agree with comments about TOBG and Assembly, even though they’re apples and oranges as far as style.

I always confuse Anthony Doer with Anthony Marr, All the Light We Cannot See and the novel about the baby abandoned on light house island and raised by the couple there.


message 507: by Tom (new)

Tom | 200 comments I'm halfway through The Other Black Girl - it is definitely more of a mainstream, plot-oriented book and will probably sell a lot more copies than Assembly; but I agree the writing isn't really on the same level.

Thanks again, Cindy! Can't wait to dive into Cloud Cuckoo Land and then we can discuss!


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments I cannot recall if we have mentioned this - but one previous winner (for the third of a trilogy) with an eligible book (which is itself a sequel to the Costa, Women's, Dublin Literary Prize shortlisted "Silence of the Girls") is Pat Barker with "The Women of Troy" which I think is published in August. My review here (Neil and Roman Clodia have also reviewed)

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


message 509: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW I like Pat Barker and I liked The Silence of the Girls so I’m looking forward to this.


message 510: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13418 comments Wonder if more likely to be on the Women's Prize next year, but the debut novel The Day I Fell Off My Island looks interesting. An unusual one as well where the debut author has a rather famous literary daughter.


message 511: by Jo (new)

Jo Rawlins (englishteacherjo) | 296 comments I think it may have been Cindy who said Sorrow and Bliss by Meg Mason is worth a read?

Although I doubt very much it will make it on to the Booker list, I would not at all be surprised if I saw it on the Women's Prize list. I am halfway through and thoroughly enjoying it! I would go as far as to say it is in my Top5 enjoyable reads of the year. Ann Patchett said she wanted to give it to everyone to read once she finished it - I absolutely agree! Exceptional characterisation.


message 512: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments Jo wrote: "I think it may have been Cindy who said Sorrow and Bliss by Meg Mason is worth a read?

Although I doubt very much it will make it on to the Booker list, I would not at all be surprised if I saw it..."


Yes that was me, and I suspect it was Ann Patchett's rave that got it on my radar screen to begin with. It really is unexpectedly quite good.


message 513: by WndyJW (last edited Jun 21, 2021 11:18AM) (new)

WndyJW Sorrow and Bliss does sound good. And I like cover design.
Sorrow and Bliss by Meg Mason


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments Graham's random judge-inspired prediction - I would not be 100% shocked to see "A Lonely Man" by Chris Powers on the longlist (even though I was not a fan) - at least one (and I think two of the judges) seem excised by Putin's Russia.


message 515: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW I can’t find A Lonely Man in book/author search.


message 517: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW Thanks, Margaret. I wrote Chris Powers, it’s Power and it doesn’t search for similar titles or names, that ‘s’ threw off my search!


message 518: by Areeb (new)

Areeb Ahmad (Bankrupt_Bookworm) (bankruptbookworm) Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "Graham's random judge-inspired prediction - I would not be 100% shocked to see "A Lonely Man" by Chris Powers on the longlist (even though I was not a fan) - at least one (and I think two of the ju..."

I was not a fan either. Would be a slot wasted if it happens.


message 519: by Laura (new)

Laura (lauramulcahy) | 122 comments Has there been any word on the key dates for this year's Booker, specifically on the longlist announcement? I had a look on the site, but nothing's been updated yet.


message 520: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments So far as I can tell, no longlist announcement date yet. I am guessing late July.

I think we've discussed Damon Galgut's The Promise in this thread, yes? I wanted to share Eric Karl Anderson's video about the book. Makes it sound like a contender to me:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3MRn...


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments I think it is - but I really hope it isn't


message 522: by Neil (new)

Neil I know GY didn’t like it, but I thought it was excellent.


message 523: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments Neil wrote: "I know GY didn’t like it, but I thought it was excellent."

Intriguing! Clearly I need to read this one.


message 524: by Jo (last edited Jun 25, 2021 07:00AM) (new)

Jo Rawlins (englishteacherjo) | 296 comments Just cracked open 'The Promise'. Perfect timing: it's the beginning of a quiet weekend with hopefully loads of reading time. I will update my thoughts daily. The opening page looks promising.

Also approved on Netgalley to read Shafak's 'The Island of Missing Trees' and Cohen's 'The Harlem Shuffle'.

So pleased my marking is all done for the year and it is nearly the summer holiday!


message 525: by Sam (new)

Sam | 2257 comments September is looking to be a busy month with quite a few Booker potentials. Previously mentioned Wole Soyinka, Colson Whitehead, Richard Powers, and Sally Rooney are all possible. Soyinka interests me because while Soyinka is a Nobel winner, that prize was thirty plus years ago and I am not sure he is much more than a name to a lot of present day readers. If his new book is any good at all, it seems an automatic, But with the big publisher push Woyinka is getting, I will like seeing how the book does in the prize categories,


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments I must admit I hope the judges don't go for September books other than if the publishers agree to move the date forward (*) - it did not end well with Atwood

(*) I cannot see that happening with Rooney as the bookshops are basing their Septembers almost entirely around that and the new Osman, or with the Powers/Whitehead as US publication date is the most crucial one. In the past its more been the lesser known books where publishers have moved dates forward.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments From initial reviews I have read both the Shafak and Whitehead seem less Booker/literary than their previous Booker listed novels. Powers does seem like a strong contender to me.


message 528: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13418 comments That's one advantage Rooney has then as her new novel is very unlikely to be less Booker/literary than her previous Booker listed one.


message 529: by Tracy (new)

Tracy (tstan) | 598 comments Paul wrote: "That's one advantage Rooney has then as her new novel is very unlikely to be less Booker/literary than her previous Booker listed one."

Ouch! 😂


message 530: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW I’m envious, Jo. My weekend will be busy with houseguests, 3 of whom are young men, and my one year dog will be overly excited, so if I get any reading done it will be a miracle.

I’m not a Rooney fan and was surprised she was nominated for the Booker, but a few of the books the last few years surprised me so I’m bracing myself. I vow not to be negative though. If I’m not excited about the list I will simply not read for it.


message 531: by Tracy (new)

Tracy (tstan) | 598 comments I just finished Assembly. What a terrific book! I hope it’s long listed.


message 532: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW I heartily agree, Tracy!


message 533: by Jo (new)

Jo Rawlins (englishteacherjo) | 296 comments Assembly is brilliant! It made me want to get my highlighters out and start annotating. A book you could reread many times and there would always be something new to discover and think about.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments I feel like we are preparing for collective outrage when Assembly is missed off the longlist.


message 535: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments That made me grin. If the longlist is anything like last year's there will be lots of room for outrage.


message 536: by Jo (new)

Jo Rawlins (englishteacherjo) | 296 comments I like a longlist with a few surprises on it. Only because it introduces me to books and authors I may not otherwise have read. But (!) last year I thought there were far too many surprises and when I did read the books I was not blown away. In fact, many of the books left me disappointed. There were so many books I felt were far more worthy. Ultimately, I am happy Shuggie Bain won.

Now, we just await an announcement as to the date and the opportunity to read Cloud Cuckooland and Bewilderment...


message 537: by Sam (new)

Sam | 2257 comments We tend to complain at the moment but last year was actually not a bad year with three novels worthy of winning. I think the big let down was the failure of the judges to nominate Spring, which many of us also thought was worthy of winning. As for the rest of the longlist, I think it follows a pattern where a large difference is demonstrated between the winner and the majority of the other books. That pattern lets the winner shine a bit more and most readers can see the distinct difference in quality. In this group I think we prefer to have the majority of the books, actual contenders because we tend to read more of the longlist. Last year I skipped a number of books from the list that didn't interest me, so it really seemed a good year.

This year I will at best have read only a couple of books from whatever they put on the longlist, I imagine , so I will have no major disappointments. I think I will be happy no matter what they pick. It will be an added bonus if it is a book I plan to read.

I dropped off my post on September novels before I had finished. Soyinka seems to have the biggest publisher push in the U.S. of the authors I mentioned releasing in September, Whitehead, Rooney, Powers, and I'll add Doerr. Soyinka has had a number of feature articles on his return, the publisher is releasing new editions of older work, etc. I am not as troubled by September books since I usually have to wait for the release from U.S. publisher's. Assembly? I will opine in 2022, since that is when it is scheduled to release.


message 538: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW Only reading the books that interest you is a brilliant idea, Sam. My longtime dream was to buy all the Booker Longlist and read along for the prize, but after spending money and time on books like The New Wilderness and other books I wouldn’t have chosen to read otherwise I think I’ll consider that dream fulfilled and stick with books that interest me.


message 539: by Robert (new)

Robert | 2654 comments When it comes to the booker, I always buy the whole Longlist. Granted some years are better than others but generally I’ll like 12/13 books, it’s always a good way of discovering new authors


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments And of having books that plenty of others are reading and debating at the same time


message 541: by Sam (new)

Sam | 2257 comments Deciding to read the full longlist depends on the what books are on the longlist too. Looking back at 2017, there isn't one book I didn't enjoy in some way. GY nailed my only reason for reading them all, and that is for the chance to chat about them. Last year was an odd year with the epidemic throwing off schedules.. The Booker longlist usually sets a trend that other lists follow, and I thought it stood out as the first of the major awards. One would usually find the longlist books scattered on all the other major awards' lists and books that didn't win often won other awards. There may be a slight change to that now, even beyond what was influenced by the epidemic, where the Booker is evolving to represent the tastes of a different contemporary audience, but I think it is too early to claim that. And were that so, I wouldn't hold the Booker responsible, since the Booker selections would represent literary fiction publishing as a whole. This year I will get excited when the longlist is published, then get picky if I find too many books of which I feel indifferent. Than simple matter is that I am able to read less and I am making time for reading books of different genres and books from different cultures, for reading and rereading old classics, and for enjoying other media. I can afford to miss a few new ones.


message 542: by Tom (new)

Tom | 200 comments I finished The Other Black Girl. It went awry for me in the last third. I thought it was a solid debut and I understand why it’s getting a lot of hype, but it didn’t land for me in the end. Three stars and don’t think it merits award inclusion.


message 543: by WndyJW (new)

WndyJW Agreed, Tom. I think that’s been the consensus here.


message 544: by Sam (new)

Sam | 2257 comments With only a month or less to go (hopefully) before the reveal, it is time to put the finishing touches on your longlist predictions. I haven't read enough to really participate. My last read was The Great Mistake. It could possibly make the list but I am thinking there are better books out there.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments If you have not its definitely worth adding your thoughts and votes on the Listopia

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1...

To me that works better as a longlist prediction on a Wisdom of Crowds Basis - and its also a very good way to judge if the list is a conventional one, or a surprise one.


message 546: by Sam (new)

Sam | 2257 comments Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer wrote: "If you have not its definitely worth adding your thoughts and votes on the Listopia

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1...

To me that works better as a longlist pr..."


I will do so GY. I've been avoiding things like that since I stopped reviewing the books I read. I could just give them stars so I could participate. Plus there are several I read from other lists that might jump to the Booker. Transcendental Kingdom has a good chance I think. But the reason I like to see full longlist predictions from the group is often the members take into consideration the judges, the publishers, and other data in their handicapping. I find it fun to read. We have already discussed the judges to some extent. Did we cover publishers? Who among the publishers is likely to have books based on former performance and this year's output? For example Grove's Open Water seems a good possibility based on the publisher though I was not overly impressed by the book. I thought they might get a shot with The Wrong End of the Telescope, But I haven't seen a release date for the U.K. But predictions based on considerations besides just the book's quality are interesting to me.


message 547: by Paul (new)

Paul Fulcher (fulcherkim) | 13418 comments Publishers can be an interesting one from a negative perspective as well - i.e. they only get so many slots. I remember last year working out that of those we'd picked as hot tips, they couldn't all have been submitted due to limits on some publishers. PRH do seem to get around that by having lots of imprints though.

Mrs Death Misses Death is feeling a strong contender 2/3rds through, and I've just received a Netgalley for Checkout 19, which at a quick flick may go straight to number 2 on my list (Sterling Karat Gold can't be budged from the top)


message 548: by Cindy (new)

Cindy Haiken | 1913 comments I am 3/4s of the way through Leone Ross' Popisho (This One Sky Day for those in the UK) and think is is absolutely wonderful. I am not one for magical realism normally, but this is a thing apart. I can't decide if it feels more like Booker material or Women's Prize material, but I really hope it appears on many, many longlists.


Gumble's Yard - Golden Reviewer | 10114 comments I have just started "Bewilderment" by Richard Powers - it seems likely to be a strong contender but has the publication date issue

So far it is giving me some vibes of a "Living Sea of Waking Dreams"/"Lanny"/"Flowers of Algernon" mash up


message 550: by Robert (new)

Robert | 2654 comments I’m not sure if you but the dates for long/shortlists will be announced tomorrow (Wednesday)


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.