Question H

[Jonetta]

Was there any difference in the psychopathy of Mick and Sam? Who was the bigger threat?

[Robin]

That's a tough question. They were both predators. Mick was a planner. He knew what he wanted (revenge on Hannah) and he planned accordingly. Sam would see something and take it...drugs, girls, whatever. He had no control over his actions and would become violent at the drop of a hat.

Both were extremely dangerous. Mick might have been the bigger threat since he could think about his actions. That could be why he never stormed the Barrett home to get to Hannah, but waited for her to leave the house. He was also more likely to get away with his actions. Sam was not a planner, he just took what he wanted.

[Lauren]

Mick was smarter and more controlled making him the more dangerous brother. Sam was ruled by his base instincts and emotions, which made him a loose cannon but not as much of a threat.

That said, together they were a force to be reckoned with. Hannah and Brody were lucky to get away with their lives.

[Sharon]

Honestly, I don't think either one was the bigger threat. They are both sick showing their crazy in different ways. As much as Mick plans, planners don't always see all the angles or they can over plan. Sam is impulsive. That can get him in trouble, but random acts are harder to figure out sometimes.

[Karen ♐]

Wow, I'm not sure who was more dangerous but I'm leaning more toward Sam. Since Mick planned what he was going to do and how to accomplish it, I don't think he would make as many mistakes. You never knew what Sam would do.

[Jonetta]

They were both dangerous in their own rights. Mick as the planner was deadly but Sam’s impulsivity and depravity was equally scary. The combination of the two? Highly lethal.