The Mystery, Crime, and Thriller Group discussion
Group Read Discussions
>
July 2020 Group Read: Thirteen, by Steve Cavanagh
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Nancy, Co-Moderator
(new)
Jul 01, 2020 02:58AM

reply
|
flag

Happy Reading to all




I only read 53 pages of this before I couldn’t take it any longer. I’d give it 1 star based on what I read, but it might have gotten better later on, so I’ll give it another for the benefit of the doubt. Every character in the book is a fantasy supernatural being. The main character is a defense lawyer who refuses to represent guilty clients. There is no such creature. That would be like an emergency room physician who refuses to treat sick or injured people. When I was in law school a criminal defense lawyer – a true believer in civil liberties, etc. – told our class that 98% of his clients “told me a guilty story and most of the other 2% were lying to me.” Another major character is a serial killer who is also a master actor, mimic, skilled makeup artist, accomplished hacker, and all-around genius. He is also willing to change his body weight and break his nose and his arm in order to accomplish his murders. I was in the FBI for 25 years and found that every serial killer was pretty much just a thug. Most of them were stupid although a few were skilled con men and some were good at avoiding detection by operating at night with masks, gloves, etc. In addition to that, the lawyer character was unethical as the opening scene proved, so I couldn’t get behind him from the beginning.

I only read 53 pages of this before I couldn’t take it any longer. I’d give it 1 star based on what I read, but it might have gotten better late..."
Of course, technically Russell is correct. But it is difficult to imagine readers enjoying books where lawyers, with howsoever great a skill, regularly getting not guilty verdicts for rapists, serial killers.
Thus, the assumption that the client is always innocent. There have historically been two ways to deal with exceptions.
One is when the lawyer gets his client off and then discovers that his client was actually guilty and uses some trick to get the said client jailed anyway( e.g. - Michael Connelly).
The other is for the lawyer to discover that the 'true' client was someone else (Perry Mason)! This is also true for non-noir private detectives (Nero Wolfe).






Glad you loved this Deepak. No, I haven't read any others in the series, but I plan to start from the beginning and read the complete series on order. ❤😍📚☕🍪






You have pretty much expressed my feelings about this book. I was interested in the premise, but the writing fell short for me. I've been catching up on some Grisham that I haven't read, and just finished A Time to Kill, where Jack Brigance mostly follows the same example as Eddie in trying to represent "worthy" clients, so it's not unheard of. And like Russell said, Kane is pretty unbelievable. Still, I read it all in record time, definitely a page turner.


Hi Deepak,
I read "The Defense" the first, I did have to suspend belief throughout, there was one situation that was beyond anything but the stuff of SuperHero accomplishment. Though I am have only completed the first quarter of this book, I liked that one better.

Just how realistic is the US court setting given that it is written by an Ulsterman living in Dublin?
3 stars



I am with you on this one Kimiko. Loved it and want to read the others in the series. I have never been a fan of legal thrillers, but this one blindsided me. I found the book to be vibrant and exciting.