2025 Reading Challenge discussion

This topic is about
The Count of Monte Cristo
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE 2015
>
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas

Rather than putting dates for each section I've done it so that it takes into account that not everybody will necessarily have the book at the same time.
Month 1: 424 pages
Month 2: 424 pages
Month 3: 424 pages


I hope this is the right way to sign up for buddy reads. If not, let me know.

Jennifer I've added you.



Beautiful cross stitch Theresa.

Since I'm fast-tracking another Buddy Read, I listened to just enough of this book this morning to tell I'm going to love the book and the narration.
I'm in. Currently on page 705 (Chapter LXIV: The Beggar) - Robin Buss translation. I'm going to read it straight through.


For those who haven't started, I'm getting through about 2% of the book a day, and I'm finding it easier to read than I anticipated. Good luck!
I finished on Sunday. Despite being a very long book, it's a quick read. It's a good book too, but I didn't love it the way some readers do. 3.75 stars. I'm going to hold back detailed comments until more people have finished.




Yep, I know how you feel, I am sort of where you are and I was having a hard time concentrating last night. I constantly found other things to do or think about.


I am about 23% done and am still enjoying it at the moment! Hopefully I won't get to disheartened by the upcoming chapters!



But then having a e-reader is quite an advantage! I can let the machine do the searching in stead of having to flick through 700 pages looking for that single section that clarifies things.


Also still plodding through! I know what you mean....it gets confusing.....
Can anyone who is over 40% done answer me this.... (view spoiler)

Short answer: (view spoiler)
I finally finished the book. I loved the story, but it could have been written in a lot less words. But as my son kindly pointed out to me: "It was written in the 1800's Ma, what do you expect!"

Short answer: [spoilers removed]
I finally finished the book. I loved the story, but it could have been written in a lot less word..."
Ok thanks! (view spoiler)

Short answer: [spoilers removed]
I finally finished the book. I loved the story, but it could have been written ..."
Sorry Ian, I'm not gping to tell you!


It took me three weeks to read Anna Karenina so I am determined to finish this in less time.
I forgot about this group. I finished reading in January.
A few things come to mind:
1. It was long, but an easy read. I didn't find it slow going like a lot of readers. Maybe that is just modern expectations of what a plot should be like, but it's style didn't put me off.
2. Once I accepted the Count's penchant for revenge served cold, I just when with the flow, though I would have killed every body if I were in his shoes.
3. The size of the Count's treasure was a detriment to the plot, I thought, it gave him basically unlimited funds to do whatever he wanted - too easy. Wealth, but not limitless wealth, would have made it more interesting.
4. The edition I read started with conversation between a critic and the translator: the critic called it a fine children's novel and the translator defending it as something more than that. After finishing the book, I finding myself sort of siding with the critic. It's not a children's book per se, but it's world view is often child like and simple. There are hints of maturity, of course, like the matter of fact treatment of a presumed lesbian relationship - so shocking early translations watered it down. So what do others think - is it mostly a children's book?
A few things come to mind:
1. It was long, but an easy read. I didn't find it slow going like a lot of readers. Maybe that is just modern expectations of what a plot should be like, but it's style didn't put me off.
2. Once I accepted the Count's penchant for revenge served cold, I just when with the flow, though I would have killed every body if I were in his shoes.
3. The size of the Count's treasure was a detriment to the plot, I thought, it gave him basically unlimited funds to do whatever he wanted - too easy. Wealth, but not limitless wealth, would have made it more interesting.
4. The edition I read started with conversation between a critic and the translator: the critic called it a fine children's novel and the translator defending it as something more than that. After finishing the book, I finding myself sort of siding with the critic. It's not a children's book per se, but it's world view is often child like and simple. There are hints of maturity, of course, like the matter of fact treatment of a presumed lesbian relationship - so shocking early translations watered it down. So what do others think - is it mostly a children's book?
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Les Misérables (other topics)The Count of Monte Cristo (other topics)
The Count of Monte Cristo (other topics)
The Count of Monte Cristo (other topics)
***Please remember to mark spoilers.***
Participants:
Theresa, Kelsi, Stefani - SpelingExpirt, Maureen, Tasha, Jennifer, Lilac, Greg, Ian, Rachel, Payten, Denise, Angelique, Meg, Sirius, Robyn, Nwanyidimma, Bookwench69