Terminalcoffee discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
31 views
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives > An introduction (James')/Badassery is up for debate/Pink and Polar Bears, a cautionary tale for the gullible

Comments Showing 51-92 of 92 (92 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Now I get it, you send Heidi in to do the dirty work. Very clever.


message 52: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments not , Jim?


message 53: by [deleted user] (new)

Yeah, everybody else would have said brawn, but not me, :-D.


message 54: by Matt (new)

Matt | 819 comments So...was there really a James? Everyone talks about James and makes comments to James but I arrive late to find no James. Now I picture him as a cypher who moves the plot along, like Guffman or Keyser Soze.

Also, knowing that Heidi punched a wiseacre in the jaw for saying that she probably hits like a girl makes me an even bigger fan of her than I already was.





message 55: by RandomAnthony (new)

RandomAnthony | 14536 comments "wiseacre" is a fun word.


message 56: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Wiseacre should be word of the day! Oh, and Ave Tadpole. Where have you been?


message 57: by [deleted user] (new)

And that's what I love about Heidi - she's modest, but she's no pushover.

As for our "friend" who insisted on challenging you...yeah, I heard about that story. Silly man. He's one of the LEAST badassed people around who fancies himself as some kind of badassed. I wish I'd had been there just to laugh in his face.


message 58: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I wish I'd seen her kick his ass.


message 59: by Matt (new)

Matt | 819 comments Hi James, and welcome.

Stephen: Sometimes I get distracted by things that are blinking or shiny.


message 60: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I've heard that Barracuda are like that too. :-)


message 61: by Heidi (last edited Sep 22, 2009 09:24AM) (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments tadpole wrote: "Also, knowing that Heidi punched a wiseacre in the jaw for saying that she probably hits like a girl makes me an even bigger fan of her than I already was."

a. I was 22 - young, proud, and immature.
b. I'd had a few drinks.
c. I had a massive crush on that guy - 6'5" baseball player (ended up playing in "the biggies," as he called it) from California.

I don't know that I'd ever do it again (then again, I don't know that I wouldn't) because the circumstances will never be the same.




message 62: by Heidi (last edited Sep 22, 2009 08:54AM) (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Gus wrote: "As for our "friend" who insisted on challenging you...yeah, I heard about that story. Silly man. He's one of the LEAST ba..."

Well, we DID convince him that our friend, who he'd not met before that night, was Norwegian royalty and that pink is outlawed in Norway because it makes the polar bears angry and violent. :)




message 63: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) How much of any of this is true? lol


message 64: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Oh, I'm sure. snicker. I love it when Heidi uses the 1,2,3 system of explanation. Also the a,b,c.


message 65: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments BunWat wrote: "Hee hee!! How much had this guy been drinking?"

At THAT point, nothing at all. We hadn't gotten our drinks at the table yet. We DID have the advantage of knowing we were going to play this practical joke on this guy all day long - so we had all day long to elaborate on this. Apparently this guy had a reputation of being tres gullible. All things considered, though, between Inga, Scott, Ian, Gus, Jaime, Sus, and myself... this guy didn't stand a chance - we were pretty convincing.




message 66: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT)





message 67: by Lori (new)

Lori RandomAnthony wrote: "Poor James. He's probably deleted his account already."

Well I missed all this, but he has deleted his account, hahaha!



message 68: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I doubt it was us.


message 69: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) No he has not. I just went to his profile and it's private. You can request to be friends.


message 70: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Stephen wrote: "How much of any of this is true? lol"


When Gus logs back on, he can verify every word of it. It really happened. We concocted the story en route to the shooting range (because Inga wanted to shoot a gun, which she'd never done).

We were all together before he joined us for dinner, so we had a good ten minutes to solidify our background info/"proof"/story.

The guy bought it hook, line, and sinker... and even after Inga walked him outside to let him in on the joke, he was still willing to believe PARTS of what we said.

He really was a nice guy, and he was a good sport about the practical joke... and eventually ending up on the ground (several times).






message 71: by Lori (new)

Lori tadpole wrote: "So...was there really a James? Everyone talks about James and makes comments to James but I arrive late to find no James. Now I picture him as a cypher who moves the plot along, like Guffman or Key..."

Ah, James pops up right after tadpole's comments, but otherwise appears gone, because I can't see any of his other posts, and the person who started this thread is a deleted member. Eh, no big deal, welcome James!

I'm afraid to comment on Heidi's fun prank because, knowing me, I might have believed it as well, I am far too gullible.

Then again, pink incurring the wrath of elephants is pretty far fetched, haha!



message 72: by Heidi (last edited Sep 22, 2009 09:49AM) (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Lori wrote: "Then again, pink incurring the wrath of elephants is pretty far fetched, haha!"

Polar bears, Lori. :) Think bullfighting and matadors and red capes and angry bulls, only in Norway... and with pink and polar bears.

And for the record, it wasn't my brainchild. It was Scott's and Inga's. I just played along.




message 73: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Mythbusters proved it was not the color, it was the movement.


message 74: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments James wrote: "Sorry for those that haven't met me yet. My name is James, and I joined goodreads yesterday. Pleased to meet all of you"

We're glad you resurfaced. Clearly some were worried that we ran you off, but I knew better.




message 75: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) I told you James was still here. I have sent him a friend request. Why, why, why?


message 76: by Lori (new)

Lori Hahaha! Maybe we can start something here. Research shows that polar bears AND elephants are affected by the color pink! Pink should NOT be worn to zoos!


message 77: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments BunWat wrote: "Infuriated elephants and polar bears storrming about the fjords, enraged by Barbie dream houses. Enraged!!"

Where are you gals getting "elephants?"




message 78: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Stephen wrote: "Mythbusters proved it was not the color, it was the movement."

Which makes the absurdity of our claim and the grandiosity of his gullibility all the more poignant.



message 79: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Now weasels in petunia hats is something I could support, riding on rampaging Norwegian elephants dressed in pink.


message 80: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments BunWat wrote: "We added elephants for our own amusement. Later on we might add weasels. Or petunias. Perhaps the weasels could wear petunia hats. "

Ah. Got it. Well, take it and run... seems like a fascinating exercise of the imagination.




message 81: by [deleted user] (new)

I can verify that everything Heidi has previously mentioned DID HAPPEN. This guy could have been convinced of just about everything...just like I once convinced my sister that Olivia Newton-John's I Honestly Love You was the national anthem of Australia.

I mean, for someone to be convinced that our friend Inga was Norwegian royalty hanging out with us commoners at a Mexican restaurant like she's taking part in a remake of Roman Holiday and not wonder if someone's jerking his chain a bit too strongly, well then, that person can be convinced of anything.


message 82: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Now that all sounds rather mean. :( Did he at least get laid?


message 83: by [deleted user] (new)

Seriously, with all the gullibility he revealed, did you expect him to tap some Norwegian royalty's ass?


message 84: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Well, it would have been nice.


message 85: by Heidi (last edited Sep 22, 2009 11:23AM) (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Plus, he was a Republican. :)


message 86: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) No reason to not tap "royalty's ass." Unless of course, he or she was butt ugly.


message 87: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Even then, butt ugly people get tapped.


message 88: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Gus wrote: "just like I once convinced my sister that Olivia Newton-John's ..."

GUS! You didn't!




message 89: by [deleted user] (new)

I ABSOLUTELY DID! I'm a natural-born bullshitter. Just ask Jaime someday about the "shark tooth" story.


message 90: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments Gus wrote: "I ABSOLUTELY DID! I'm a natural-born bullshitter. Just ask Jaime someday about the "shark tooth" story."

Oh, I've already heard that one from her. I have to say, I'm a pretty good practical joker, too... I had my sister convinced that she was adopted (it seems I mentioned that recently on here).



message 91: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (stephenT) Now that was cruel! I hope some mama whooped up on some Heidi booty for that one.


message 92: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments My aunt played along... she confirmed to my sister that she was adopted.

She deserved it at the time, though - she was a mean, mean, MEAN kid. She's sweet and perfect and wonderful now, though.


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.