Distorted

[Antonio]

There are some interesting insights but the author is primarilly deflecting blame on Catholics and Jews, while defending Freemasons in England and the US. Freemasons originated from England and were originally corrupted in nations that persecuted Catholics and Jews after Protestant reform. With so much focus on Freemasons and Catholics there is a failure to point out that the Catholic church, specifically the Pope, banned Freemasonry in the 18th century. Anyone who has actually read the disturbing writings of Germany's Martin Luther, would recognize the vitriol of the author.

The author also continuously contradicts his points while blaming Catholics and Jews. It is true that the first person to document Illuminati, was a Catholic Jesuit priest, Abbe Barruel, yet the author elaborates on the Jesuits participation because they taught in most of the schools. Prior to reformation, the world was Catholic and education was a part of charitable missions that Jesuits excelled in. Despite persecution of Catholics by the German princes, it is likely that Jesuits remained teaching.

The author names conspirators such as Frederick II, King of Prussia, who is directly related with the current House of Windsor, which is also German, and fails to explain the correlation or elaborate, on the known conspirators with money and power to wield such infuence. The author claims it was Jewish and Catholics who influenced Weishaupt.

To pretend that Adam Weihaupt is the main culprit of Illuminati and was able to accomplish these revolutionary changes in societies around the world, which were still under a feudal system, is disturbingly naive.

To attack traditional faiths, under the guise of "Defending the Faith" is cynicism that points to Illuminati influence in my opinion.

A lot of distortions, with few glimpses of thruth in these writings.