Great Middle Grade Reads discussion

This topic is about
Restart
ARCHIVES: BOTM discussions
>
BOTM for February is Restart
date
newest »

message 1:
by
SaraKat
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 02, 2020 04:18PM

reply
|
flag

Unlike those stories, the Chase we know is not a bully. From this point of view, there is no character growth of a bully. At the end of the day, he wasn't even able to turn his old partners-in-crime round. They continue to be nasty pieces of works, even if they are not as threatening as before having lost their ring leader.
I really enjoyed reading the book this month. I enjoyed the way the POV changed and the small, bite-sized chapters. I agree that there was no growth of the bully and no back-story, but I can imagine it. I enjoyed the redemption arc with the bullying in the past because I have a hard time reading books that are so awful and unfair in real time. In this book, most of the terrible stuff was behind us so we could focus on the happy ending portion. I also think that if he was able to redeem his ex-friends, it wouldn't be as realistic. There will always be awful kids in school, but at least they didn't have as much power as before.

This one was an enjoyable read. The amnesia idea created some interesting possibilities, even if I found it a bit unbelievable (could a knock on the head really change someone’s personality? I think to make it real, I’d need more sense that the “good Chase” was always there lurking under the surface, and instead we find more and more that he was just awful). What made it work, I think, was the chance to have one character see bullying from both sides, as it were.

Me too! Especially the lengths he went to to create 'Leaf Man'! I could never bring myself to do that! :D
I'm glad you mentioned about the simplistic characters. Indeed, they strike me as stereotyped as these sporty vs not-sporty characters are not the first tropes I've come across. So I have this question for my friends across the pond who work in schools, do the US education system really have occurrences like this ie are American footballers such a big deal that they rule the school despite such behavioural problems? This would not be tolerated in the UK. I am not aware of any sports, despite the popularity of football and rugby, the lads, not matter how good they are, are not local stars to the extent that they escape disciplinary actions.


I wondered if children were more susceptible to this dramatic change and perhaps the science behind treating TBI knows more that we "observed" decades ago.
Trudy, thanks for that input. I guess I could have done a little research, but I was lazy. I assume you are talking about real personality changes, not the loss of the child that was due to reduced capacity, etc.
What about Chase’s sudden change from near-failing student to straight-As, including apparently having retained all that stuff he supposedly wasn’t learning before? I have more trouble buying that.
What about Chase’s sudden change from near-failing student to straight-As, including apparently having retained all that stuff he supposedly wasn’t learning before? I have more trouble buying that.
Rebecca wrote: "Trudy, thanks for that input. I guess I could have done a little research, but I was lazy. I assume you are talking about real personality changes, not the loss of the child that was due to reduced..."
Not having read the book I suppose I shouldn’t discuss it, but I tend to agree with Rebecca on a change to ‘brilliant’.
Most brain injuries I’ve heard of the person often has to relearn from scratch. As Rebecca knows, I have a friend who has had to relearn how to talk, although thankfully her knowledge and understanding didn’t suffer.
Not having read the book I suppose I shouldn’t discuss it, but I tend to agree with Rebecca on a change to ‘brilliant’.
Most brain injuries I’ve heard of the person often has to relearn from scratch. As Rebecca knows, I have a friend who has had to relearn how to talk, although thankfully her knowledge and understanding didn’t suffer.


Oh good. Glad to hear, glad to hear!

So many of you loved it that I’m tempted to dip my toes in a bit further to try to understand why, but I really just don’t think this is my cup of tea!!

Although it did require extra effort to maintain the suspension of disbelief because of the unlikely situation with the amnesia, I enjoyed the book and thought it was a neat way to look at the possibility of starting over. Readers could come away with the liberating idea that they don't have to be stuck forever in the path that they are currently on. Also, the idea that we shouldn't insist on treating people as if they never will change. I also liked the plot twists.
One thing that occasionally bothered me was the way the author kind of "cheats" in the first-person writing. When writing in first person, one needs to use words and phrases that the narrator would use. But in that first chapter, when Chase is waking out of his coma and is thinking things like "The lady beside me is choked with emotion," or, "the last thing I'm in the mood for is to be soothed," and things like that, it distracted me because the words didn't seem like how the character would express himself.
Carlin wrote: "This book had a surprisingly long waitlist at my library, so I’m late to the party. And, sorry to say, I’m also the lone dissenting voice. I barely started it, but have no desire to finish. It’s an..."
Carlin, I'm sure you see that you are not alone in finding the premise and the execution a bit unlikely :) I'm glad to have my take on it confirmed!
Carlin, I'm sure you see that you are not alone in finding the premise and the execution a bit unlikely :) I'm glad to have my take on it confirmed!