2025 Reading Challenge discussion

This topic is about
Between Shades of Gray
ARCHIVE 2014
>
Between Shades of Gray: Part 1 - Thieves & Prostitutes (Contains spoilers)
date
newest »



When Jonas observes his mother smashing her beloved china and cr..."
When I read this part,the only idea that came to my mind was that she thought maybe the Russians may take all their furniture for themselves,so she broke them in order not to give them the chance!But now I'm thinking maybe her act was symbolic!And I think as long as I do not have the same experience,I can't tell whether it was an appropriate reaction or not!

http://www.betweenshadesofgray.com
I'll use those to get the discussions rolling
When Jonas observes his mother smashing her beloved china and cr..."
Good question. It was very brave of her I think. The only way she could stand up to the Soviets. In some ways it was similar to Ona's act of defiance in not allowing the soldiers to have her baby's body - letting it fall on the train tracks instead.
I'm loving this book so far! It is very easy to read and a real page turner. I was worried that it would be so tragic that it would be painful and difficult to read, but so far it is manageable. I feel like it might get worse!


I also thought that the mother was using what little power she had to protest the injustice being perpetrated on her family. I would have done the same thing. If you are going to steal from me, I will destroy all I can first. Meg, you made a good comparison with the mother and the babies body. They didn't have much to resist with, but they defied the Soviets as much as they could.

I agree with you all about the mother's act of protest. I thought that was the second most memorable part of the book so far (the first being the baby's and Ona's deaths).
This is enjoyable so far, but I do wish it weren't written in the first person. I'm finding it a little distracting and would prefer an objective narrator. I'm also not feeling as much emotion from Lina as I would have expected, but maybe she's in shock?

How did you all feel about the 'flashbacks'?
Since I listened to the audio version, I found the flashbacks confusing. It would take me a minute to figure out that Lina was in the past. When I picked up the paper version, I saw that the flashbacks are in italics.
For some books, they work really well, but I found the delivery flat in this novel. The background information could have been delivered in another way and been just as effective.




I think the mother is my favorite character and I liked that she broke the china. She is defiant at times, but generally smart about how she goes about it. I'm interested in the idea of Lina drawing what's happening to document it and also in hope of guiding her father to them. I wonder if part of the reason we're not getting a lot of emotion from Lina is that she's kind of playing the role of an observer so she can capture what is going on in her drawings.

http://www.betweenshadesofgray.com
I'll use those to get the discussions rolling
When Jonas observes his mother smashing her beloved china and crystal
before they depart their home, he asks her why she is destroying these
items. She replies, “Because I love them so much.” (p. 18) Do you consider
this an act of rebellion? In your opinion, is her reaction appropriate? In
what ways is she trying to control the situation?