Prehistoric Fiction Writers and Readers Campfire discussion
What would you do if your shaman was incompetent?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mary
(new)
Nov 17, 2014 03:00PM

reply
|
flag




I like this answer very much!
I like the idea of confiding in one or two trusted friends, then setting out to solve the problem--either by exposing the shaman in a conventional manner, or getting help from the gods.

I totally agree. This would present a very serious dilemma

Here's an idea: We could write a story as a group, using Dropbox, then when we feel it's ready, we could publish it 1) on our own websties as a freeby, 2) chapter by chapter on our own websites, 3) or some other way. But the point is, we could all use it to build our audiences--for free.
Thoughts?

I'd love to participate, but I don't have a dropbox (if I do, I haven't found it yet, or learned how to use it). If it's something I can link to my website, or tell PB friends where to find it, that would be enough for me.

Perhaps we can start this the first week of December?
We'll need some guidelines. Here's what I propose, but they are totally open to change as you wish. I've never done this before, so I'm just making this up as I go:
1. We designate what order we will write in
2. The person whose turn it is will write 500-1000 words, picking up where the previous person left off
3. Each person will try to write once a week???
4. When you finish your turn, you email the next person in line so they can write???
Help me out here. What suggestions do you all have for doing this. It shouldn't be onerous on anyone, just fun.

I'm afraid I'll have to bow out of the writing--but I will gladly be your number one fan and commentator.
I have a book coming out this week, and I just agreed to run the Writers Workshop at a local convention this spring. So probably not a good time to take on additional writing commitments.
But I look forward to reading this story. BTW, will your shaman be just incompetent? Or more on the greedy and corrupt side?
I have a book coming out this week, and I just agreed to run the Writers Workshop at a local convention this spring. So probably not a good time to take on additional writing commitments.
But I look forward to reading this story. BTW, will your shaman be just incompetent? Or more on the greedy and corrupt side?

Here's another thought to start us off:
Maybe one person should write a brief into to the characters so we can all work with the same set of "people"
And Someone else should design the world and give us some rules for how that world works. Then we all need to try to keep our characters in the same world (I guess)
Sandy can be our critic or coach as we go along, when she has time
What do you think?

I'm really looking forward to this, people. Mary, you have my email address (I only have one) but let me know if you need anything else. This will be my first time working with dropbox.

Thanks, Sandy. Did you survive the rain?



The story should be available through Dropbox. Mary has added some info about the group also.
The shaman's name is Wolf Eye, not Owl Eye.
Your addition is welcome!

Claire,
I sent you a message on Goodreads. If you'll send me your email address, I can give you access to the story on Dropbox. Cheers,

Ha! This same thing actually happens in my book lol
The high priest of a village Ember visits (Cardium Pottery Culture people from France) has a priest who wanders around the idea of keeping the people believing in what he knows/suspects isn’t true but needs to keep the people in order. He believes in Gods and suspects that they have some will… but he finds himself bending his people’s interpretation of events to match his guess at the “truth”, all of the while knowing that he is likely wrong.
Except from Chapter 3: The Great Lunar Festival
Perhaps a God or Gods exist or perhaps they do not. What is for certain is that religion is a construct of humanity which seeks to facilitate and govern humanity's interaction with a proposed God or Gods, as well as with itself. In effect, religion is a method of self-governance which allows a culture or civilization to invoke its own order by divine mandate. This begs the most important, and yet allusive question: is that mandate justified? The acceptance of divine mandate without empirical proof is said to be faith, the opposite of a secular empirical mandate. Humans have historically seen fit to follow faith over empiricism, which is perhaps a general property of the human condition.
Humans have a need to see cause where there is an effect. From Birth, people observe cause and effect in their lives for every action they take. It is of little wonder why events which cannot be readily explained were and still are attributed to supernatural beings. The proof often offered for the existence of these beings is their alleged causation of that which we cannot explain by any other means. By definition, this is an argument of incredulity. Regardless of this illogic, it is for certain that religion has had the effect of moderating society. Of this, we can be empirically sure.
The order imposed by a culture's predominant religions is often governed by the general hierarchy and social constructs of that culture. As a result, many aspects of a culture may be inferred by the study of its religion. Many hypothetical models for the religious ways of ancient peoples from the Neolithic period have been proposed by historians, religious scholars, and enthusiasts. There have been many attempts to fully reconstruct the religions of ancient peoples based upon the plethora of these hypotheses. These many attempts have resulted in a degree of misinformation, misunderstanding, and confusion where prehistoric religion is concerned. The truth is that no one really knows to any real degree of certainty what people believed, other than more prominent aspects recorded in sculpture and works of long dead believers.

Ha! This same thing..."
The description of your priest or shaman sounds like modern-day politicians!

Ha! Thi..."
In a way, many can be.
Consider a priest or priestess who believes there deity is real (and how know, it may be) and uses real world events to imply meaning where there may not be any. This would sound deceitful unless you consider that the person believes that there really is a meaning and it is currently beyond their understanding... Sort of metalogical, but it happens.
I have my priest working multiple agendas. He really thinks he is doing the right thing, but he changes the people's mind as needed.
For example, he is going to perform a ritual sacrifice but he tries to be merciful (chapter 16: The Right Choice):
"He would risk the ire of the Gods and give her herbs to make her calm, he decided then. That shouldn't anger them much as they seemed only displeased that she had escaped death, not for any deed which warranted pain or suffering. She wouldn't know what was happening and would slip away without much pain."
The priest has to juggle the will of the Gods, the right thing to do, the interests of the tribe, and the emotions of the people... a difficult task.
(Chapter 17: The Greatest River)
"With luck, the people were buying his story. He had dragged the man into the hut where he would “examine” the body and have it buried before anyone could see. He hoped the people would accept his answer. "
These are excerpts from my book:

Ember of a New World