Nothing But Reading Challenges discussion

This topic is about
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Buddy Reads: Current & Upcoming
>
Rowling, J.K ; Harry Potter and the Philosopher's (Sorcerer's) Stone (Harry Potter #1) - Informal Buddy Read; Start date November 10, 2014 - REVISIT - July 5, 2017 - REVISIT - 12 May 2018 - REVISIT Sept 1, 2020


I worried about these things too, but it is so, so worth it!

so like i said, i accidentally finished the book last night lol. i mean it knew it was short but it only took 3 hours to read so i was like ...might as well. my roommate got home from work at 11:30 and i was like 'i accidentally reread the sorcerer's stone' 'what, the whole thing? right now?' 'yes' 'well only about 5 things happen in it so that sounds about right' kind of harsh but also kind of true, which leads me into my first question:
[this is just general so no real spoilers, i figured i would space my comments out over a few days and do the general ones first]
i'm interested to see the opinion of people who are reading for the first time and also people who have read this book like 10+ times, but do you feel like this book is kind of slow to start at the beginning? i mean i know she has to set all the groundwork and i'm not saying it's boring by any means but it DOES take them a third of the book to even get to hogwarts, which is so out of whack with the pacing in the rest of the books. then once they get there i feel like everything is moving in fast-motion and like i'm reading an abridged version of a story. it's still a good book but when you compare it to the intricacy of the later books it feels very simple. i know she kind of wrote them for an older audience as we all grew up with this series, but it's always so weird for me going back to the beginning and see how bare-bones everything is.

I am not rereading this book, bc I just read it, but I want to join the discussion.
(view spoiler)
Devann, I have read the first book 10+ times. Sometimes when I read it, it seems to be slower, in the beginning, than in the end, but I am so into the story that I just pay attention to it. The first book is more like an introduction to HP series, who is he, how he ended up there, why and so one.

First time reading Harry Potter, I'm wanting a little clarification; is a "muggle" just an ordinary person? Muggles were mentioned a lot in chapter 1.
Looking forward to learning more ..."
(view spoiler)

(view spoiler)

I didn't feel it was slow to start personally...but I only saw each movie once and, like you, I'm just reading for the first time. I tried reading before...I'm liking better this time...explanation in my post.
I was worried I would not like...but the audio version is very good...I'll continue this route for as long as the books are available at the library.

Also I'm not reading for the first time lol Sorry if I gave that impression, maybe I should go edit my post to make it clearer? But I've read this book like ...10 times at a conservative guess, probably more.

I know exactly what you mean...I do see those exact characters in my mind when I'm reading...not all bad when there are sooooo many characters.
I always prefer to read first...I think when you watch the movie first you feel like the book is 'wrong' or 'different'...you are right...when you read first, it's a feel of 'how similar' they are.
You get a bit more detail in the book...as in it's explicit what houses the professors are from...it wasn't like that to me with the movie...anyway...I didn't assume anything particular about the characters and what house they were from when I watch the movies.

Jotting down a few comments for now.
I have seen a couple of the movies and have read none of the books. I have just finished reading about Daigon Alley.
@Devann - I don't think that the pace of the story is too slow, and perhaps that is because I don't know what is going to happen in the rest of the book. Once I finish the book my thought may change about the pacing.
Rowling does indeed need to set the stage and give some back story on the Dursleys. That Dudley is one rotten little boy. Its one thing to say that Dudley is a bully but it really sticks in your thoughts when she gives a few examples of what he and his gang have done. (view spoiler)
I am really enjoying the descriptions when Hagrid takes Harry to Daigon Alley. (view spoiler)
Rowlings attention to detail in this world is amazing and I wonder how long she took in designing this world. She must have lived these series of novels brewing in her head for many years.
I am envious of those of you who got to grow-up with HP. I don't think that in my childhood that there was any novel or series of novels that I could compare this to.

Jim Dale's narration is spot on though.

For HP, I've seen the movies so many times but this is my first re-read, and I am so far surprised about how many things I forgot were not in the movie (although I remember there being a lot). I am totally enjoying this re-read.
For those of you saying you're reading the illustrated version, where did you get that? I'm so jealous.

@Rosina good to know re: the pacing. honestly i think it only seems weirdly paced to me because i've read it so many times so i'm like picking it apart on every level lol
and she definitely spent a lot of time and effort planning out this world. you don't really notice it until your first reread i think but she very clearly had the entire plot planned out even from the time she published the first book because there are tons of parallels throughout the books [mostly notably they kind of fit into pairs: 1&7, 2&6, 3&5, and then 4 all alone in the middle lol]. but it's a really intricate series.


I agree that the first one is much slower than the others, but it is very much a children's book more than any of the others and does lay the groundwork for the whole series - so I don't mind it at all! And I only notice that it takes nearly halfway through until they're at Hogwarts while I'm reading the book; when I think about the story later, it never feels that way to me.



So true, Devann! It's really set the standard in my mind for excellence in world building. It's why it's so enduring and has launched so many things - Pottermore, the games, the theme parks. People want to live in this world. Amazing!

First time reading Harry Potter, I'm wanting a little clarification; is a "muggle" just an ordinary person? Muggles were mentioned a lot in chapter 1.
Looking forward to ..."
Elen wrote: "Laura wrote: "chapter 1."
I am not rereading this book, bc I just read it, but I want to join the discussion.
[spoilers removed]
Devann, I have read the first book 10+ times. Sometimes when I r..."
Thank you Elen and Tammie for clarifying for me!

JK really knew what she was doing.



I've always wanted to start Kate Daniels so I should pop over there and give her a go.

As tempted as I am to read my illustrated editions I am starting with this edition as it is far easier to carry about.



For the Harry Potter books it's a bit different as I see those as a collection and enjoy the hunt of finding different editions (only at deep discounted prices/yard sales/etc.) and pick them up when I do, to add to my original Raincoast Books/Bloombury set from my childhood & the illustrated editions I've recently been getting for Christmas ever year. (oh & the Ravenclaw edition of the 20th anniversary book which I couldn't resist lol)
Of the first book these are the editions I currently own (I have the most of the 1st book - my only full set is my childhood originals):














I don't have much to say at this point, but that I'm really excited to be back in these books! I totally forgot about Piers being Dudley's friend lol.
Although, this is the first time I've wondered this question: The wizards spent the whole day celebrating after finding out that Voldemort was gone. If Harry didn't go to the Dursley's right away, where was he for the very first day of life? Was he with Hagrid all day? I can't imagine they spent a whole day traveling. It makes me wonder how that first day went. I never thought about it before.




Samantha wrote: "Chapters 1 & 2
I don't have much to say at this point, but that I'm really excited to be back in these books! I totally forgot about Piers being Dudley's friend lol.
Although, this is the first ..."
Huh, that definitely is an interesting question. Never thought about it, but there is definitely a time gap somewhere in there because with a flying motorbike it definitely take that long to get from Godric's Hollow to the Dursley's. Maybe they just had to hole up somewhere for a while so no Deatheaters could get to him in case some were still around and dedicated to the cause?
I don't have much to say at this point, but that I'm really excited to be back in these books! I totally forgot about Piers being Dudley's friend lol.
Although, this is the first ..."
Huh, that definitely is an interesting question. Never thought about it, but there is definitely a time gap somewhere in there because with a flying motorbike it definitely take that long to get from Godric's Hollow to the Dursley's. Maybe they just had to hole up somewhere for a while so no Deatheaters could get to him in case some were still around and dedicated to the cause?

I have a lot of different editions, complete series: Paperback English, Paperback Dutch, Ebook English, Ebook Dutch, Audible audio narrated by Jim Dale. I have also listened to the complete series narrated by Stephen Fry via Storytel and I have the films on DVD. I have started my collection of the illustrated editions, but only the first three are out.
I have now started the Dutch audiobooks via Storytel
(Storytel is a audiobook service where you pay 10 euro a month and have unlimited acces to audio and ebooks both in English and Dutch)
I own only one edition of the books and that's by far enough for me no matter how much I'm tempted by some of the newer editions because the covers are so pretty. Or, well, I wouldn't mind a Slytherin edition ;-)
I just finished my reread of the first book and I have to admit that by the time the end was nearing, I was starting to get bored by it. I'm not sure whether that is because I remember most of the story - the general drift anyway even if I've forgotten a lot of the smaller details. I usually don't reread books and this is actually the third time for HP#1.
I loved this first book when I first read the story but in the meantime... I'm not so sure I'm still so thrilled by it all. I'm not quite sure why exactly that is, in the first book anyway.
Also, I never realised how much of a scaredy-cat Hermione was in the first book. Almost cowardly, which doesn't fit into my overall image of her.
I just finished my reread of the first book and I have to admit that by the time the end was nearing, I was starting to get bored by it. I'm not sure whether that is because I remember most of the story - the general drift anyway even if I've forgotten a lot of the smaller details. I usually don't reread books and this is actually the third time for HP#1.
I loved this first book when I first read the story but in the meantime... I'm not so sure I'm still so thrilled by it all. I'm not quite sure why exactly that is, in the first book anyway.
Also, I never realised how much of a scaredy-cat Hermione was in the first book. Almost cowardly, which doesn't fit into my overall image of her.
Vicki wrote: "I think I am odd man out because I don't own any HP books. I know, I know. So I need to still get my book from the library or MAYBE I'll but the entire set. Some books are simply more than a book a..."
And there are so many editions of these books you can buy which are just gorgeous!
And there are so many editions of these books you can buy which are just gorgeous!
Eldarwen wrote: "I own only one edition of the books and that's by far enough for me no matter how much I'm tempted by some of the newer editions because the covers are so pretty. Or, well, I wouldn't mind a Slythe..."
The first book is much more of a "children's" book. There is quite a leap once we get to book 3, I feel.
I like going back to book 1 because it is easy to forget how young and different all the characters were (like Hermoine) and how awful the Dursely's were to Harry!
The first book is much more of a "children's" book. There is quite a leap once we get to book 3, I feel.
I like going back to book 1 because it is easy to forget how young and different all the characters were (like Hermoine) and how awful the Dursely's were to Harry!

This is not my first read and probably not my last. It is the first time listening to the Dutch audio and I like the narration so far.
It is not the best one, I liked the Stephen Fry narration best.
From the first line in this book it is like stepping into a warm bath. It's difficult to say anything about what I have read so far, because I've read this series so often. This book is just a nice introduction to the magical world and to the characters of this book. This is also what I love about this series is that you grow with them.

Devann wrote: "@Eldarwen I really hate Hermione's characterization in the first book, and also just the fact that the only girl in the trio has to be the uptight rule following tattle tale one because just [yawn]..."
so true.
I never really warm to her though. Probably my only criticism of JKR (but I still love you!)
so true.
I never really warm to her though. Probably my only criticism of JKR (but I still love you!)

I agree the books definitely aged with the characters. You can tell her writing matures as the characters mature and become more complicated. Going back and re-reading them is going to be so much fun.
Books mentioned in this topic
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (other topics)Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (other topics)
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (other topics)
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (other topics)
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (other topics)
More...
Team Moaning Myrtle