Rated YA-MA discussion
Archive
>
Check-UP BOTM
date
newest »



My thought process was to encourage more discussion. If someone already nominated a book that would have been your suggestion, you can chime in and boost that book.
Some groups do 1 nomination and 1 second per poll. Would that be more to your liking?
*Most people have been either nominating or seconding a book these past few months.

That is doable. Or if there are natural breaks in a story, we can use them. (If the post-er has read the book far enough in advance to set it up properly.)

I like Diane's suggestion about the discussion of the book though. More discussion would be great.


I try to nominate books I haven't read unless it is something I passionately want other people to read.
Any suggestions for improving the process?
Any rules modifications needed?
Are the nomination voting periods too long or too short?
How about the trial new rule? Should we keep it?
Here are the rules as they currently stand:
Members have 7 days to nominate books.
- One nomination per member.
- Trial New Rule: Members may second as many nominations as they wish. The top 10 nominations will be part of the polls
- Nominations need to be YA nominations only.
- The book must be first in a series or a standalone.
- The book must be at least 3 months old, so members don't have to fight with new release waitlists at the library.
- Book must also be available in print and not just ebook form.
- No author promotions, please.