Catholic Thought discussion
Treasure in Clay
>
Reading Schedule & Introduction
date
newest »

You're welcome ladies, and I accidentally called Fulton "Cardinal" above. I was corrected, and have corrected it. His highest rank was Archbishop. Thank you to the person who corrected me. Since this person did it privately perhaps this person didn't want to be noticed, so I'll leave it as private. All, please feel free correct me any time. My humility requires it!
Introduction
As an introduction to Sheen’s autobiography, I don’t think I can do better than Raymond Arroyo does in the forward to the book. So what I’ll do is highlight a couple of key passages from the forward as our introduction. Arroyo subtitles the “Foreword” as “A Prophet Suffering in Silence.” I haven’t read the book yet, so I can’t attest to the accuracy of the subtitle. As an autobiography I doubt Sheen himself would claim that to be the central thesis of his life. He was too humble, to my perception, to claim the title of prophet and too modest to present himself as suffering in silence. The subtitle is probably Arroyo’s reading into Sheen’s life. Nonetheless we shouldn’t dismiss it. Perhaps Sheen didn’t mean this as a label for his life, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t fit.
Curiously Arroyo begins the foreword with an extended anecdote from Sheen’s life that never makes the autobiography. It’s the story of a conflict Sheen had when he was bishop in 1957 with his superior, Cardinal Francis Spellman. You can read the details but in short Pope Pius XII resolved the conflict in Sheen’s favor to the Cardinal’s chagrin, of which he never forgot and bitterly extracted revenge by assigning Sheen to Rochester, NY, which for a man of Sheen’s public notoriety was assigning him to the boondocks of civilization. (My apologies to anyone that may live in Rochester.)
Arroyo makes the point that “none of the details related to the Spellman affair nor Sheen’s personal feelings about the Cardinal’s actions are mentioned in the autobiography.” Arroyo comes to this conclusion:
As to prophet, Arroyo cites the Holy Father himself as on Sheen:
My goodness, that’s exactly what I aim to do and be. It’s what I see as the mission of this Catholic Thought Book Club. Fulton Sheen is my ideal man, the epitome of the religious man communicating the Truth of Jesus Christ using the means of our culture and past. Arroyo then goes on to highlight Sheen’s lasting legacy.
Arroyo finally gets what I anticipate as the center of the book.
And Arroyo ends with Sheen’s “silent suffering,” a suffering servant of sorts.
I didn’t nominate Treasure in Clay; I didn’t even know it existed. But I am so glad it was selected. It was an inspired choice, perhaps right from the Holy Spirit Himself. I am so looking forward to reading it.
As an introduction to Sheen’s autobiography, I don’t think I can do better than Raymond Arroyo does in the forward to the book. So what I’ll do is highlight a couple of key passages from the forward as our introduction. Arroyo subtitles the “Foreword” as “A Prophet Suffering in Silence.” I haven’t read the book yet, so I can’t attest to the accuracy of the subtitle. As an autobiography I doubt Sheen himself would claim that to be the central thesis of his life. He was too humble, to my perception, to claim the title of prophet and too modest to present himself as suffering in silence. The subtitle is probably Arroyo’s reading into Sheen’s life. Nonetheless we shouldn’t dismiss it. Perhaps Sheen didn’t mean this as a label for his life, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t fit.
Curiously Arroyo begins the foreword with an extended anecdote from Sheen’s life that never makes the autobiography. It’s the story of a conflict Sheen had when he was bishop in 1957 with his superior, Cardinal Francis Spellman. You can read the details but in short Pope Pius XII resolved the conflict in Sheen’s favor to the Cardinal’s chagrin, of which he never forgot and bitterly extracted revenge by assigning Sheen to Rochester, NY, which for a man of Sheen’s public notoriety was assigning him to the boondocks of civilization. (My apologies to anyone that may live in Rochester.)
Arroyo makes the point that “none of the details related to the Spellman affair nor Sheen’s personal feelings about the Cardinal’s actions are mentioned in the autobiography.” Arroyo comes to this conclusion:
Those looking for literary payback need to look elsewhere. (Spellman is even praised!) Instead, what follows is a singular autobiography, one that is more an internal portrait of a man than an external one. And what a man Bishop Fulton Sheen was.
As to prophet, Arroyo cites the Holy Father himself as on Sheen:
Pope Pius XII once referred to Sheen as “a prophet of the times.” He engaged all facets of the culture in a dazzling way. An author of more than sixty books and a columnist, he used his well-trained mind to touch the common man. Explaining the Gospel with true innovation, he often appealed to poetry, philosophy, history, architecture, song, and art to drive home his message.
My goodness, that’s exactly what I aim to do and be. It’s what I see as the mission of this Catholic Thought Book Club. Fulton Sheen is my ideal man, the epitome of the religious man communicating the Truth of Jesus Christ using the means of our culture and past. Arroyo then goes on to highlight Sheen’s lasting legacy.
But perhaps he is best known for his broadcast work. Before Mother Angelica, Pat Robertson, and Joel Osteen, there was Bishop Fulton Sheen. In his magenta cape and zucchetto he was a media trailblazer who often beat Milton Berle and Frank Sinatra in the ratings. For more than fifty years he transformed rarefied theology into the idiom of the masses, using radio and then television to bring a message of hope to people of all faiths and those of none at all.
Arroyo finally gets what I anticipate as the center of the book.
This autobiography would be Bishop Sheen’s last treasure. It is at once an exploration of an apostle’s journey and a history of the Catholic Church in the twentieth century. A participant of the Second Vatican Council, Sheen offers a stinging critique of the failure to properly interpret the Council documents.
And Arroyo ends with Sheen’s “silent suffering,” a suffering servant of sorts.
This book was written during a period of intense physical suffering for Sheen. Starting in 1977, he underwent a series of surgeries that sapped his strength and even made preaching difficult. He must have known this would be his final work because one senses an urgency on these pages, an eagerness to impart these lessons, particularly those dealing with the spiritual bounty found in pain. The last chapters crackle with the same zeal and determination as a final homilies from the late 70s: they are prophetic and impassioned, free from the gilded edges of the past.
I didn’t nominate Treasure in Clay; I didn’t even know it existed. But I am so glad it was selected. It was an inspired choice, perhaps right from the Holy Spirit Himself. I am so looking forward to reading it.

I thank you Lisa for nominating it. I'm going to read the autobiography before I get Bishop Barron's Pivotal Player video on Sheen. Thanks.
I'm finding that the bio - I've read a couple of chapters now - have the same charm and wit of his television show. Perhaps it would be a good introduction to the book to watch an episode. Here's a 21 minute episode of a Fulton Sheen broadcast, subtitled, "How to Improve Your Mind." It's bot funny and educating at the same time. I can see how he was so popular.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uUdo...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uUdo...



It's great that several have started reading. The schedule for this week is to read through chapter four. Our custom here at Catholic Thought, for the newer members, is to discuss the previous week's read on the following week. So we plan to discuss these first four chapters next week. I'll have a short summary and the folder up by the end of the week.
I know some people like to read an entire book in one week. But not everyone has that kind of reading speed or that kind of time on their hands. The reason I space it out this way is twofold. (1) It gives everyone a chance to pace together, and (2) it allows for a more detailed discussion. If you read a book in a week, it causes the discussion to be more generic and big picture. If you break it down to smaller bites, you get more of a "deep dive" discussion. And I figure most people are reading other books in parallel anyway.
I know some people like to read an entire book in one week. But not everyone has that kind of reading speed or that kind of time on their hands. The reason I space it out this way is twofold. (1) It gives everyone a chance to pace together, and (2) it allows for a more detailed discussion. If you read a book in a week, it causes the discussion to be more generic and big picture. If you break it down to smaller bites, you get more of a "deep dive" discussion. And I figure most people are reading other books in parallel anyway.


My initial impressions:
What a humble man
What a wonderful writer
Celia wrote: "I am reading on Kindle. Worth every penny of the 14.00. I am through chapter 2. I am going to make my Kindle highlights public and make a few comments there.
My initial impressions:
What a humble..."
I'm reading on Kindle too. I have no idea how to make my highlights public. However, I highlight on almost every page. Perhaps too overwhelming to share that.
My initial impressions:
What a humble..."
I'm reading on Kindle too. I have no idea how to make my highlights public. However, I highlight on almost every page. Perhaps too overwhelming to share that.

Findagrave
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/6...

My initial impressions:..."
I'll give you instructions some time in PM if you want.
Celia wrote: "Manny wrote: "Celia wrote: "I am reading on Kindle. Worth every penny of the 14.00. I am through chapter 2. I am going to make my Kindle highlights public and make a few comments there.
My initia..."
OK, if it's not to much trouble. I probably won't use it now, but perhaps in the future. Thank you.
My initia..."
OK, if it's not to much trouble. I probably won't use it now, but perhaps in the future. Thank you.
The Catholic Company has a really nice Fulton Sheen rosary on sale, here:
https://www.catholiccompany.com/fulto...
I'm tempted but not sure I want to spend $80. It's beautiful though.
https://www.catholiccompany.com/fulto...
I'm tempted but not sure I want to spend $80. It's beautiful though.

Funny story, when my great-grandmother (whom I was pretty much raised by) saw the book when I purchased it she told me how she rarely missed his radio program or his television show. I was shocked due to her being a Southern Baptist. When I asked her if she knew he was a Catholic Bishop she replied, "He knew God and was such a holy man." I am amazed how she could not converted to Catholicism. She passed away in 2017 (she was 95) and I pray for her.
I have read up to Chapter 4. I cannot wait to discuss Chapter 1-4 with the group.
God Bless and May each of you enjoy your Sunday,
Nikita
Hi Nikita, that is fascinating to learn about your Baptist grandmother's fondness for Bishop Sheen. God rest her soul.
The folder for the first four chapters is up. You can begin posting your thoughts.
The folder for the first four chapters is up. You can begin posting your thoughts.
Week 1, 9/15, chapters 1 thru 4, 49 total pages.
Week 2, 9/22, chapters 5 thru 8, 59 total pages.
Week 3, 9/29, chapters 9 thru 10, 69 total pages.
Week 4, 10/6, chapters 11 thru 14, 60 total pages.
Week 5, 10/13, chapters 15 thru 16, 57 total pages.
Week 6, 10/20, chapters 17 thru 20, 51 total pages.
Week 7, 10/27, chapters 21 thru Epilogue, 33 total pages.
As you can see the chapters are of different length. There are a couple of weeks where we’re only reading two chapters.
I’m really intrigued by this book. In a way, Archbishop Fulton Sheen spans the Catholic Church in the 20th century. Looking at the chapter headings, we’re going to get into some interesting topics.
If no one objects to that reading schedule, let’s get going.