The Catholic Book Club discussion

This topic is about
The Restoration of Christian Culture
Restoration of Christian Culture
>
2. Solutions to current problems
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Manuel
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Aug 31, 2019 11:50PM

reply
|
flag


Jill wrote: "He contrasts "simply" reading with analyzing with the help of atlases, dictionaries, etc. That seems like a false dichotomy. Even in reading aloud to little ones, it's good to make sure they unders..."
This was actually one of his comments that made sense to me. I think what he is saying ts to read the story as the author has written it. If you don't understand a word, or the relationship between two places becomes important and you need to look at an atlas to understand the author's point, then sure you need to do that. But there are many people today who won't read a book without first reading several reviews or approaching the book in a technical fashion as one might do in a modern college literature course. I try to ignore reviews before reading a book and never read forwards by people other than the author when reading a novel. I want to experience the story, straight from the author, as he or she intended.
I have had debates in the past with some like that who insisted that my criticism of a book was wrong (!?) because of all the great reviews they had read.
This was actually one of his comments that made sense to me. I think what he is saying ts to read the story as the author has written it. If you don't understand a word, or the relationship between two places becomes important and you need to look at an atlas to understand the author's point, then sure you need to do that. But there are many people today who won't read a book without first reading several reviews or approaching the book in a technical fashion as one might do in a modern college literature course. I try to ignore reviews before reading a book and never read forwards by people other than the author when reading a novel. I want to experience the story, straight from the author, as he or she intended.
I have had debates in the past with some like that who insisted that my criticism of a book was wrong (!?) because of all the great reviews they had read.
John wrote: "I have had debates in the past with some like that who insisted that my criticism of a book was wrong (!?) because of all the great reviews they had read."
This reminds me of C.S.Lewis saying somewhere that reviews of Plato's works are usually very dull, while Plato's works are great reading!
This reminds me of C.S.Lewis saying somewhere that reviews of Plato's works are usually very dull, while Plato's works are great reading!

