The Seasonal Reading Challenge discussion
FALL CHALLENGE 2019
>
Group Reads Discussion - The Huntress
date
newest »


I loved all the characters, they all had distinct well meshed personalities. The flow between the different time periods didn't jar be as some books do, and worked well into the story.
The great thing about historical-fiction is that it might just teach you something new. While I have read about the women aviators of WWII, no thanks to school, this was a fascinating read, and heartbreaking as you knew how it was going to end, one way or another. Women are useful during a war, but not after. These women had guts, determination, passion. I would use the term fearless, but they do fear, the author is determined that we know this, and how the women push and guide themselves, and each other, past their fear.
And learning some folklore, BONUS. And how I wish I was a quarter like Nina.
Overall, good, very readable historical fiction. I did like Nina's storyline and how women were portrayed with traits that are usually attributed to men in historical fiction.
I thought the book dragged on a little long. And Jordan was a bit too good to be true. I couldn't wait to get back to the other subplots.
But like Deborah said above, "The great thing about historical-fiction is that it might just teach you something new." This book was intriguing enough that I want to know more. A Dance with Death: Soviet Airwomen in World War II or Night Witches: The Amazing Story of Russia's Women Pilots in WWII might have appealed to me more. I would be interested in separating Quinn's fiction from fact.
I thought the book dragged on a little long. And Jordan was a bit too good to be true. I couldn't wait to get back to the other subplots.
But like Deborah said above, "The great thing about historical-fiction is that it might just teach you something new." This book was intriguing enough that I want to know more. A Dance with Death: Soviet Airwomen in World War II or Night Witches: The Amazing Story of Russia's Women Pilots in WWII might have appealed to me more. I would be interested in separating Quinn's fiction from fact.




The voices of all the characters were distinct (something I feel Kate Quinn often excels at).
While the mystery of who the huntress is didn't last long, the story was compelling and I loved seeing how the threads were bought together and how she was shown in all her aspects as a human, not a caricature of evil.


Historical fiction has always been a favorite genre of mine, though I sometimes shy away from one more WWII novel. I found the story of the Night Witches fascinating, because I had not previously heard of them until the publication of this novel. I enjoyed the alternating stories of the characters and switch between time periods. Even though it was easy to figure out early on who the Huntress was, I felt the real mystery was how the lives of all the characters intersected and their stories were revealed. This was an engaging story, sometimes a little slow. I give it 4.5 stars, rounded up to 5.

I reread this book and found it to be quite thrilling even though i knew what was going to happen. The way the author built suspense into the plot line through the characters of Nina, Anna and Jordan was pretty chilling and ingenious. The subject is difficult yet important and I thought it was a book well worth reading and rereading!



I couldn't get into the investigation, I didn't connect with any of the characters, and I found the entire premise a bit unbelievable. The initial incident between The Huntress and Nina didn't feel to me like it would haunt them forever. Nina flew dozens of missions for the Soviets and, I assume, heard plenty of war stories from her fellow comrades and from Germans after their surrender. Yes, the incident was the closest she came to her own death, but it still seems a bit thin.
I do want to read The Alice Network, but I hope my lackluster feelings about this book don't interfere with my enjoyment of it.

The Russian's story was the best, even though I think it was the most cliche'd. But it was "tough guy" cliche, which is, I guess, unusual for a woman character in a book that has many "ckick lit" components. Chief among the annoying latter were the sections which took place after the war.
The Russian pilot Nina was completely well-rounded though. And I loved her group, The Night Witches. The cliche'd part only came from how Hemingway-esque she was presented sometimes, as if her manliness was being tested. But maybe I am wrong and that was the least cliche'd of the various parts of the book -- and maybe that is the reason why I felt the "chick lit" presence in certain parts more than in others.
I am sure my POV offends some folk with how sexist I see the storyline and character presentation. But I think the author has purposefully constructed the story to where the reader has to think about how different genders might treat situations differently.

Anna remained a bit of a mystery, but I think that was intentional as she was the one being hunted and part of being hunted is being discovered. It felt like the writer was allowing the other characters to discover parts of themselves in the process of hunting Anna.
Ian, Tony, Jordan and Nina were all flawed characters whose interactions brought struggle and healing.
I enjoyed the interpersonal play in the lives of the characters and the writing overall. I gave it 4*.


I really enjoyed this book and rated it 4 stars. I really enjoyed the background story of the Night Witches and will be looking for some non-fiction books about them.
I'm really glad this was one of the picks for this challenge as I had not heard of this book before and I'm glad I read it.

Books mentioned in this topic
The Alice Network (other topics)A Dance With Death: Soviet Airwomen in World War II (other topics)
Night Witches: The Amazing Story Of Russia's Women Pilots in World War II (other topics)
The Huntress (other topics)
The requirement for task 20.10: You must participate in the book's discussion thread below with at least one post about the contents of the book or your reaction to the book after you have read the book.