Outlander
discussion
Do you think the TV Series is influencing the way you interpret the book

Well, the spanking scene takes place after ..."
Well, hopefully, they won't leave it out. I know "the spanking" has been the topic of some heated discussions here on Goodreads ... Since it is Starz I don't think they would be worried about offending the masses. Personally, I think once Claire gets over being enraged and mortified, she allows herself to see Jamie in a different light and it marks the point she begins to fall in love with him.


I'm curious what others think: What else might've accounted for the change? Was it the shock of trying and failing to return to Frank? Did the gravity of her situation finally sink in? Did she suddenly see Jamie as "real" and begin the blissful fall into love? After Jamie promises not to lift a hand to her again, even though at the time it was considered "a husband's right" (*chokes*...blech), does she realize there is even more depth to this man?
I'm sure there are a bunch of factors. Thoughts?


I don't think I answered the question but I think they do Jamie perfect each way.

He had lots of affairs even before Claire went back. They were separated for 5 years for the War. I believe Claire admits to having kissed another person or two during that time but was smart enough not to let it turn sexual.

I read DG's comment regarding Frank's affairs and then read his and Claire's conversation in Voyager..."
I think they were both just trying to cope with a bad situation. It's even easier for me to believe that Frank went to other women since we know Claire's heart was still with Jamie. That's another reason Claire might not of brought it up over the years. If he was with other women, she didn't have to sleep with him, although we know she did. I'm not judging there, he was her husband, but I think she still felt it was a betrayal to Jamie and had guilt later. It was a lose/lose situation. Both parties were victims. Both parties were equally guilty of hurting the other. The only winner was Bree.

I think it affected how I saw things. I saw the first episode and started reading the series. So that did color the way on how I saw things. As many others have said, the TV series has a lot more insight on Franks point of view. But it is still neat to compare and contrast what you did read and how you saw it in your head vs on the screen. It seemed to me she was more devoted to Frank in the TV series then in the books.

I read DG's comment regarding Frank's affairs and then read his and Claire's conversation in Voyager [spoilers removed]
I wanted to let you k..."
Too bad we couldn't ask her about that. The rest of her letter makes sense to me but this conversation with Frank doesn't match up.

I read DG's comment regarding Frank's affairs and then read his and Claire's conversation in Voyager [spoilers removed]
I wanted to let you k..."
You think Claire is to blame for Frank's affairs or did I misread that? She did tell him to leave her when she came back through the stones. He chose to stay. So, if anyone is to blame, it's him. And then he does say he's leaving, he tries to take her daughter away.

I think her failing to get back through the stones and the realization of how she could have gotten Jamie and the rest of the McKenzie men killed when they came to rescue her form BJR.

It's a good question if anyone wants to ask. From this page on her website she seems very open to questions. I'd hang out at CompuServe more often, but Goodreads is already taking a chunk of my life. : )



From reading assorted interviews I know the spanking scene was filmed, so it will show up in the show at some point.

What makes you think Frank cheated during the war and where does it say Claire kissed others?"
The book never says that Frank did have affairs. He never admits it and there are no scenes of his infidelity. Claire merely wondered if he had because he never said he hadn't. I choose to think not, although I believe he did strike up friendships with sympathetic women who wanted more than he was willing to provide (yes, I like Frank!) to compensate for Claire's pining for Jamie.
It's a mistake to forget that these are people raised in the 1930s and '40s. Marriage today is like a public library---take a book out, take it back when you're done---no stigma attached, even if there are children. Their generation would be extremely unlikely to consider it a serious option. They are Catholic after all, and in that generation divorce was nearly unheard of and somewhat scandalous, especially for Catholics.


I'm an avvid reader and this thing really has me hooked!!!

Oh Patti, it only get worse ... You will read one after the other ... Then (because the books are so long) your family begins to revolt .. Your friends wonder what happened to you ... AND worse, you go stark raving mad because it is going to take 4 years for you to get the final fix ... Whew, Welcome to the Mania!!!!

LOL, Shawn! As I'm on book 4, I have to agree!

That's good to know ... It would leave the viewers with a different take on the evolution of Jamie and Claire's relationship, I think.

It's a good question if anyone wants to ask. ..."
Well Becky, how cool is that .. Thanks!!!

I'm in for the ride for sure! My husband says I am borderline obsessed!!!

yeah, he is being nice now, wait until you are 3-4 books in LOL:D

You have awesome will Gertt, I bought it and demolished it .. I just couldn't wait.
I'll do a re-read of the series before long.




I just found this thread, and very happy I did! I had never read the books but was so hooked by the 6th episode, I picked up Outlander and read the whole thing before the next show - the Wedding episode. I was surprised how close it stayed to the book, how much the actors fit the characters, and how the scenes that were embellished worked. I'm now addicted and reading Voyager.

I read the book first and I went into the TV series with a pretty firm grasp on how I felt about the characters. Sometimes they hit the mark, sometimes they don't..."
Wonderful perspective, and great additional info!

Congratulations L.G. Welcome to the fanatical fan club of Outlander ... as you can see we are all die hards.

I saw a Trailer with the TV Dougal ... I have to agree ... I think he is very handsome.

As for the TV series, I really took notice of Dougal (er...maybe it was the actor) after the wild pig hunt. What an awesome scene. Then we see another side of him in the episodes at the Garrison. He carried off the arrogant pride like a true bad ass. The man deserves an Oscar, or at least a Golden Globe. Same with Tobias for his portrayal of BJR

I agree with you on both counts. Dougal seems like a real person. BJB is just plain scary. When he talked about whipping Jamie, it just made me sick.
Of course, Jamie could just stand there and that would work for me!!

Long ago I read the entire series of these novels and loved every minute of the read(s). I think the TV version is wonderful, when I can understand the accents. I'm more of a visual person…so the series really is bringing the story to life.

I listened to the series on audible and the reader was great. She used English and Scottish accents so I got so used to listening that once when my husband asked me a question while I was listening I answered " aye" :-)
He finds the accents difficult to understand but I think because of all those hours listening I am able to understand them!!


Actually seeing the first show I wanted to relisten and I now see Jamie like the tv (in my mind he had redder hair and I like red heads!), I think I still see Claire as half what I had imagined (she was described as having that apple bottom men like and nice round breasts, not skinny like on the show) and curlier hair but the face of Claire on the show. If that makes any sense!! So yes it has changed a bit. Though like I mentioned earlier most of the characters look on the show just like she described them in the book. Dougal is more handsome than I had imagined and Murtaugh too. But they still look a lot like I had thought of them.

*grins*

I think, if I recall correctly, the only other tall character so far should be Dougals. Claire, whos supposed to be 5'6 (not 5'10) says somewhere in the book that even she is taller (or same height) than most of the men of the times.
So Sam would be fitting the description if the others were. Otherwise, they need a 7 ft actor, which I imagine, would be hard to come by.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Outlander (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Written in My Own Heart's Blood (other topics)Outlander (other topics)
Well, the spanking scene takes place after Jamie rescues h..."
But, didn't he tell her before he left her in the woods what he would do if she wasn't there when he returned? That wasn't mentioned in episode 8 so I was just curious how they would bring it up.