Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy discussion
General SF&F Chat
>
All there on the back
date
newest »


I would guess the publishers are usually to blame. They're in a competitive industry, and they evidently feel they have to make a book sound as intriguing as possible to get you to buy it in preference to its competitors. It's not surprising if, in a bid to convey to you just how gripping the book is, they sometimes give away too much.


I remember a romance book that made me so mad, because the blurb made it appear to be a vampire romance, when in reality it was about an alien. It really ticked me off. I had wanted to read a vampire romance - if I had wanted to read one with an alien, I would have specifically searched for it (yes, it's been years, and I still get frustrated about it).
So I would prefer to err on the side of too much, rather than too little, information.
With online shopping, either for the books or e-books, the blurb isn't on the back of the book anymore, but rather in the Product Description. As a reader, I tend to hope the blurb will tell me enough about the book so I can decide if I might like it. However, the people who write the blurbs have a different agenda, which is convincing me that I will like it and ought to buy it, which is in the same thing. (Shocking! Advertisements aren't always helpful.)
One of the most important things I want to learn about the book is in the story but the writing style. Does the author think he's a reincarnation of Dostoyevsky or Edgar Rice Burroughs? (Unlike litcrap reviewers, I prefer the latter to the former. If the blurb is from the New York Times review of books, I skip it.)
Reading reviews on Goodreads or Amazon is a crapshoot, since those reviewers aren't always good at tagging spoilers.
By the way, one of my favorite spoiler covers is actually for a movie, the original Planet of the Apes (1968) DVD, whose cover is actually the final shot of the film (click to view cover - SPOILER WARNING). "You Maniacs! You blew the surprise!"
One of the most important things I want to learn about the book is in the story but the writing style. Does the author think he's a reincarnation of Dostoyevsky or Edgar Rice Burroughs? (Unlike litcrap reviewers, I prefer the latter to the former. If the blurb is from the New York Times review of books, I skip it.)
Reading reviews on Goodreads or Amazon is a crapshoot, since those reviewers aren't always good at tagging spoilers.
By the way, one of my favorite spoiler covers is actually for a movie, the original Planet of the Apes (1968) DVD, whose cover is actually the final shot of the film (click to view cover - SPOILER WARNING). "You Maniacs! You blew the surprise!"

I fancy I did a decent job with my book. Or did I? Maybe sales would be vastly hotter with less concern about providing spoilers. After all, there are a huge number of very strange people (in my view) who only go to a movie after the bulk of it has been revealed in the preview.
It always makes me think of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. When the narrator reveals the heroes safely make planetfall with only a bruised arm by way of injuries. This was revealed because too many people stress about such things. To preserve some mystery, we won't tell you who bruised their arm. (paraphrase)
Look, I already know X will be the greatest threat Y has ever faced. You told me when I read the back cover, don't have it be a shock 1/3rd of the way in.
I don't know if it's sloppy writing on the author by having the plot move so slowly, or poor planning by the publisher.