CVHS Honors English discussion

This topic is about
Fahrenheit 451
Post #1: Characterization
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Michelle
(new)
-
added it
Sep 17, 2014 12:13PM

reply
|
flag














In part one of Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montage is described in the beginning to be an average fireman. This is until he meets a friendly girl named Clarisse, who makes him look at his life from a new perspective. The way Montage acts around Clarisse could suggest that he feels something, he may not know what it is just yet, but he seems very kind and friendly to Clarisse. Although, this shift in character could potentially lead to his downfall.

In part one of Fahrenheit 451, characterization is portrayed through imagery. An example of this can be found throughout the first part of the book. Clarisse seems to change Montag's point of view of the society in which they are living in within the first couple of times Montag speaks to her. SH had a different point of view on life then Montag does and after he talks with her a couple of times he begins to notice the things she notices, for example the rain. Towards the beginning of the book Montag seems to have a ruff appearance but once he starts to socialize with Clarisse he appears to become softer around the edges.








In the first part of the book, characterization is used mostly in the form of dialogue. For example, Guy Montag is portrayed as a man of view words and is mostly concerned for himself. Throughout part 1 he starts to get a more worldly view and not think of himself when he says things like, "What, was it always like this? The firehouse, our work?" (Bradbury 31). He's now finally questioning the motives and purpose of his work. I hope he keeps on changing throughout and eventually ends all the destroying of books in the world he lives in.







I agree with statement for a few reasons. I believe it is evident through dialogue and self reflection of Montag. He thinks to himself about conversations he has had with Clarisse and all of which show that Montag is slowly becoming more aware of the surroundings and the wrong he is doing.




I agree with J.R's statement when he says that characterization is conveyed by one's thoughts/dialogue. A character's development begins with the character's personality and how unique the character is upon his/her's personality. A character's dialogue is based off the character's personality and how he/she reacts within a situation. The characterization through Montag's dialogue by Bradbury shows change within Montag overtime as he begins to be open-minded about the situations around him.

I agree with Alexander because the imagery that pertains to the different emotions and standpoints of the three characters that he focused on are key aspects that help the reader further understand the text. Montag is "wearing a mask" because he has negative opinions about burning books, but he can't share this opinion because it is frowned upon by the society. Mildred does have unresolved issues that she "puts on the back burner" because she enjoys the way that she is.

I agree with Alexander because what he wrote really describes how Montag is portrayed during the beginning of the book. He kind of keeps his actual emotions away while he fakes happiness. All along, Montag really seems like an introverted person, but tries to seem extroverted and happy with his work.





All the dystopian books, short stories, and poems we've read seem to have the common theme of censorship. In these societies, they have all been oppressed by their government by the use of censorship. By censoring certain things, the protagonists are being restricted from education and knowledge to fight back efficiently against their dystopian governments. Each protagonist in all the pieces of literature we've read have experienced some sort of censorship which fueled their ineffective uprising against their government.

After reading many selections of dystopian literature, I feel like most of the time, if not all the time, the theme generally has something or other to do with censorship. With the protagonist being the "only person who can change the way things are!" kind of attitude, this makes these types of books get very repetitive very quickly. Since censorship is controlling everyone, no one has the intelligence to stand up to their oppressors, except for that one protagonist who has somehow escaped the public's brainwashing with seemingly no explanation. The problem, I think, with dystopian books, is that their themes are very rarely different from others, which makes them seem almost like they were crafted from a cookie-cutter; the same.


Goodreads Post One: Characterization
Guy Montag- A generally interesting protagonist, the book takes a different route within his characterization. Unlike most uncreative heroes, aspe..."
I agree with Mike that in many ways, Montag is not the perfect heroic protagonists as seen in other books, even within this genre. Montag, in the beginning seems content doing his dystopian job of burning books and conforming to society, but eventually realizes that his life is bland, and at that moment begins to change entirely.